Hey Chiwan!
Is the problem reproducible? Does it always deadlock? Can you please wait
for it to deadlock and then post a stacktrace (jps and jstack) of the
process? Please post it to this issue: FLINK-2183.
Thanks :)
– Ufuk
On Monday, June 8, 2015, Chiwan Park > wrote:
> Hi. I have a problem r
Sachin Goel created FLINK-2187:
--
Summary: KMeans clustering is not present in release-0.9-rc1
Key: FLINK-2187
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2187
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hi. I have a problem running `mvn clean verify` command.
TaskManagerFailsWithSlotSharingITCase hangs in Oracle JDK 7 (1.7.0_80). But in
Oracle JDK 8 the test case doesn’t hang.
I’ve investigated about this problem but I cannot found the bug.
Regards,
Chiwan Park
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:11 AM, Má
Added F7 Running against Kafka cluster for me in the doc. Doing it
tomorrow.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Chiwan Park wrote:
> Hi. I’m very excited about preparing a new major release. :)
> I just picked two tests. I will report status as soon as possible.
>
> Regards,
> Chiwan Park
>
> > On
Hi. I’m very excited about preparing a new major release. :)
I just picked two tests. I will report status as soon as possible.
Regards,
Chiwan Park
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 1:52 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> As previously discussed, the Flink developer community is very eager
Hi everyone!
As previously discussed, the Flink developer community is very eager to get
out a new major release. Apache Flink 0.9.0 will contain lots of new
features and many bugfixes. This time, I'll try to coordinate the release
process. Feel free to correct me if I'm doing something wrong beca
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2186:
--
Summary: Reworj SVM import to support very wide files
Key: FLINK-2186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2186
Project: Flink
Issue
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2185:
--
Summary: Rework semantics for .setSeed function of SVM
Key: FLINK-2185
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2185
Project: Flink
Issue
Gábor Hermann created FLINK-2184:
Summary: Cannot get last element with maxBy/minBy
Key: FLINK-2184
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2184
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvemen
Sachin Goel created FLINK-2183:
--
Summary: TaskManagerFailsWithSlotSharingITCase fails.
Key: FLINK-2183
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2183
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Felix, I tried to reproduce the problem with the *Hash join exceeded
maximum number of recursions, without reducing partitions enough to be
memory resident.* exception. I used the same data set and the same settings
for ALS. However, on my machine it runs through without this exception.
Could yo
That would be better of course. My opinion had to do with
not-implementing-exactly-the-same-thing-twice. Perhaps Till could weigh in
here.
We really do need to come up with a general mechanism for this. Testing
labeled vectors has exactly the same problem. I'll look into how Spark and
sci-kit appro
I am in favor of efficiency. Therefore I would be prefer to introduce new
methods, in order to save memory and network traffic. This would also solve
the problem of "how to come up with ids?"
Best regards,
Felix
Am 08.06.2015 12:52 nachm. schrieb "Sachin Goel" :
> I think if the user doesn't prov
I think if the user doesn't provide IDs, we can safely assume that they
don't need it. We can just simply assign an ID of one as a temporary
measure and return the result, with no IDs [just to make the interface
cleaner].
If the IDs are provided, in that case, we simply use those IDs.
A possible te
My gut feeling is also that a `Transformer` would be a good place to
implement feature selection. Then you can simply reuse it across multiple
algorithms by simply chaining them together.
However, I don't know yet what's the best way to realize the IDs. One way
would be to add an ID field to `Vect
Yes. I agree too. It makes no sense for the learning algorithm to have
extra payload. Only relevant data makes sense.
Further, adding ID to the predict operation type definition seems a
legitimate choice. +1 from my side.
Regards
Sachin Goel
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Theodore Vasiloudis <
t
I agree with Mikio; ids would be useful overall, and feature selection
should not be a part of learning algorithms,
all features in a LabeledVector should be assumed to be relevant by the
learners.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Mikio Braun
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there are number of issu
Aljoscha Krettek created FLINK-2182:
---
Summary: Add stateful Streaming Sequence Source
Key: FLINK-2182
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2182
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improv
Hi all,
I think there are number of issues here:
- whether or not we generally need ids for our examples. For
time-series, this is a must, but I think it would also help us with
many other things (like partitioning the data, or picking a consistent
subset), so I would think adding (numeric) ids i
You're right Felix. You need to provide the `FitOperation` and
`PredictOperation` for the `Predictor` you want to use and the
`FitOperation` and `TransformOperation` for all `Transformer`s you want to
chain in front of the `Predictor`.
Specifying which features to take could be a solution. However
The problem is still there. @Aljoscha: It would be great if you could take
it.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Gyula Fóra wrote:
> I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.
>
> On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi wrote:
>
> > FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persi
I have now created the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2181
Best regards,
Gabor
2015-06-08 0:55 GMT+02:00 Robert Metzger :
> What is the status of this issue?
> I think we should at least file a JIRA for it to have it around as a TODO.
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Gábo
Gabor Gevay created FLINK-2181:
--
Summary: SessionWindowing example has a memleak
Key: FLINK-2181
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2181
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Co
I agree with Marton. I thought Aljoscha was working on that.
On Monday, June 8, 2015, Márton Balassi wrote:
> FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
> solving it asap.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22,
FLINK-2054 is definitely a problem if it persists. Sorry for missing it,
solving it asap.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 00:22, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> > What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2177 and
> > https://issues.apache.org/ji
25 matches
Mail list logo
