Re: Gelly, problem vertex centric iteration

2015-04-19 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi Yi, by debugging a bit your code, it seems that the problem is in the pre-processing step and more specifically in the filtering you do on the self edges, in the helper transferGraph method. I will have to dig a bit more to figure out the issue, but until then you should be able to work around

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-1912) how can get top 10 row in flink

2015-04-19 Thread hagersaleh (JIRA)
hagersaleh created FLINK-1912: - Summary: how can get top 10 row in flink Key: FLINK-1912 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1912 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug Environment:

problem when use this coding please found slove

2015-04-19 Thread hager sallah
I use linkedlist to pass value in filter function in this coding not resulting from code but when pass value direct to filter function th result is   (2,Customer#2,XSTf4&&NCwDVaWNe6tEgvwfmRchLXak,121.65,AUTOMOBILE)problem in this line i pass value from linkedlist c.getField(4).equals(val

Gelly, problem vertex centric iteration

2015-04-19 Thread Yi ZHOU
Hello everyone, I need some suggestions about debuging the Affinity Appropogation algorithm for gelly. In my implementation, there is a problem with the MessagingFunction in Vertex Centric Iteration The test graph is a completed directed graph (25 vertices in total), i.e. there are two oppo

Gelly, problem vertex centric iteration

2015-04-19 Thread Yi ZHOU
Hello everyone, I need some suggestions about debuging the Affinity Appropogation algorithm for gelly. In my implementation, there is a problem with the MessagingFunction in Vertex Centric Iteration The test graph is a completed directed graph (25 vertices in total), i.e. there are two oppo

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace user@f.a.o with Stackoverflow

2015-04-19 Thread Ufuk Celebi
Thanks for the info Henry. Then I'll just add some text to the webpage to make sure people know how to look for old ML answers via Nabble. Should do the job as well. :-) On Saturday, April 18, 2015, Henry Saputra wrote: > Unfortunately as top level Apache project we can not have official > discu