Henry Saputra created FLINK-1785:
Summary: Master tests in flink-tachyon fail with
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: IBM_JAVA
Key: FLINK-1785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1785
Project: F
Just pull from master and saw different error when running mvn test.
I just posted it to dev@ list.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> What do the logs say? It looks as if there is some issue with the
> TaskManager start up because the main is in the method
> waitForTaskMan
Hi All,
I just pulled from master and seemed like it fails mvn test:
---
T E S T S
---
---
T E S T S
Hi,
The link to the draft proposal that I've prepared is
https://gist.github.com/akshaydixi/88f3fbcebab0119a6a31
It would be great if I could get some feedback on it.
Regards,
Akshay Dixit
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Akshay Dixit wrote:
> Thanks Gyula.
>
> I agree too that simple and workin
Hi Janani!
Do I understand you correctly in that you want a Flink stream source that
receives UDP datagrams and turns them into Flink DataStream?
Such a thing is not in there, yet. The interface to define custom data
sources is rather simple, though, it should be possible to add something
like th
+Table API / Table
I have a feeling that Relation is a name mostly used by people with a
deeper background in (relational) databases, while table is more the
pragmatic developer term. (As a reason for my choice)
Am 25.03.2015 20:37 schrieb "Fabian Hueske" :
> I think the voting scheme is clear.
>
I think the voting scheme is clear.
The mail that started the thread says:
"The name with the most votes is chosen.
If the vote ends with no name having the most votes, a new vote
with an alternative voting scheme will be done."
So let's go with a single vote and handle corner cases as they appea
+Table, DataTable
---
How are votes counted? When voting for the name of the project, we didn't vote
for one name, but gave a preference ordering.
In this case, I am for Table or DataTable, but what happens if I vote for Table
and then there is a tie between DataTable and Relation? Will Table
Hi,
Does Flink's streaming api has support for
reading streams of data via Java UDP (DatagramSocket)? If so kindly
advise me in which release of Flink I can find it.
Thanks,
Janani
Hey Aljoscha,
This is not an accident :D
The reason behind only supporting time-window joins at the moment, is
because time-window-joins can be implemented in a completely non-blocking
fashion arising from the global nature of time.
All other windows would need to be matched properly which inevi
+Relation
On Mar 25, 2015 6:29 PM, "Henry Saputra" wrote:
> +Relation
>
> PS
> Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > DataStream in the new expression-bas
I haven't understood what the issue is actually.
I though that maven is using the properties from "flink-parent", which is
setting the scala version to 2.10 by default anyways.
(By the way: mailing list replies to JIRA mails are not automatically added
as comments to the JIRA)
On Wed, Mar 25, 20
+Relation
PS
Aljoscha, don't forget to cast your own vote :)
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>
> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
+DataTable
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +Relation
>
> 2015-03-25 17:52 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
>
> > Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> > DataStream in the new expression-based API.
> >
> > From the previous discussion thread three name
+Relation
2015-03-25 17:52 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
> Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
> DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>
> From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
> Table and DataTable.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 h
Please vote on the new name of the equivalent to DataSet and
DataStream in the new expression-based API.
>From the previous discussion thread three names emerged: Relation,
Table and DataTable.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
The name with the most votes is chosen.
If the vote ends with n
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-1784:
Summary: KafkaITCase
Key: FLINK-1784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1784
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Streaming
Will take a look at that. The easiest solution would be to fix the version
to 2.10 for now. Is this OK?
2015-03-25 1:48 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen (JIRA) :
> Stephan Ewen created FLINK-1781:
> ---
>
> Summary: Quickstarts broken due to Scala Version Variab
Hi,
I noticed that the way you specify windows for a join differs from the
way you specify windows on a DataStream. Maybe I'm missing something
here. :D
If not, is there are reason for this behaviour? Are there any plans to
consolidate?
Cheers,
Aljoscha
Hi Stephan,
Glad to meet and chat for sure =)
Love to see Flink represented in the ApacheCon.
- Henry
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Thanks Henry for sharing!
>
> I will be in Austin and give a talk on Flink [1].
> Just ping me if you'd like to meet and chat :-)
>
> Ch
When consensus not happening we will go with VOTE. I think we have 2
candidates of names which are table and relation.
- Henry
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> I also prefer Relation. So what should we do? Doesn't really look like
> consensus.
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at
What do the logs say? It looks as if there is some issue with the
TaskManager start up because the main is in the method
waitForTaskManagersToBeRegistered. This happens for the initial
ForkableFlinkMiniCluster start.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I saw a similar issue yes
I agree with Aljoscha on this. DataTable does not make a lot of sense to
me... (except for going nicely with DataSet and DataStream).
2015-03-25 13:58 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
> But why DataTable? What other kind of Table could it be, CarTable? :D
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Alexande
But why DataTable? What other kind of Table could it be, CarTable? :D
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Alexandrov
wrote:
> +1 for DataTable as core abstraction name and "flink-table" or something
> similar as the package name.
>
> 2015-03-25 11:54 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
>
>> I als
+1 for DataTable as core abstraction name and "flink-table" or something
similar as the package name.
2015-03-25 11:54 GMT+01:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
> I also prefer Relation. So what should we do? Doesn't really look like
> consensus.
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Paris Carbone wrote:
> >
I saw a similar issue yesterday as well:
The following test gets stuck: TaskManagerFailsITCase should handle hard
failing task manager
Apparently, the task managers never registers. Can someone confirm this from
the stack trace? Did someone run into this as well?
$ jps 23800
surefirebooter6764
I also prefer Relation. So what should we do? Doesn't really look like
consensus.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Paris Carbone wrote:
> Both names look ok but if I had to choose I would go for the Relation API.
> It defines a new DSL in contrast to data types (ie DataSet, DataStream) so it
> d
Hello Yi Zhou,
you are right that if every "data point"-vertex sends messages to every
other vertex, this algorithm is too expensive and won't scale.
However, I think that we don't need to consider all data points as
exemplars for every vertex.
Actually, you can see the input graph capturing thes
Thanks Henry for sharing!
I will be in Austin and give a talk on Flink [1].
Just ping me if you'd like to meet and chat :-)
Cheers, Fabian
[1] http://sched.co/2P9s
2015-03-25 1:11 GMT+01:00 Henry Saputra :
> Dear Apache Flink enthusiast,
>
> In just a few weeks, we'll be holding ApacheCon in A
29 matches
Mail list logo
