aybe none of the
two :)
2013/8/5 christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> Hi Alex,
>
> sorry for the late Response. I was on a short Holiday trip.
>
> I have to admit that I didn't implement the Integration in Flexmojos, but
> as far as I understood the code, Velo used some code-gene
Hi,
Unit testing is a pretty tricky thing in Flexmojos. That's one of the things I
am intending on performing the largest changes the the new plugin. But from
your question I can see you are using an about 100 year old Version of
Flexmojos and Flex. I know I did quite a lot of tweaks and update
ate that word.. "manually".
Is there a more recent version or alternative to mockolate as well?
And is this a multi day or multi hour process to mavenize the FDK?
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
the letters A, V, and I
> and the number 47
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Avi Kessner wrote:
> > So legally we can't store these sdks for maven publicly? I see 4.1 is
> > 112MB, yech.
> > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
> > and the number 4
tters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
> And I hate "lawyers" more than "manually" ;-)
>
> It's actually a Multi Minute process to Mavenize an FDK as I created the
> Apache Flex Mavenizer for t
13 23:27
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: FlexUnit
On 8/29/13 8:08 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Well the Problem are the Adobe libs ... playerglobal and some others,
>that we are not allowed to publish. There wouldn't be any trouble with
>deploying the re
: FlexUnit
On Aug 29, 2013 11:44 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> Well the poms themselves don't help with the libs. I will probably be
adding functionality to download Adobe stuff after asking for confirmation
by the user as we discussed s
Re: AW: AW: FlexUnit
Just incase it isn't clear, the command line tool requires some user
specific arguments, so the installer needs to handle that as well
On 30 Aug 2013 10:28, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013 11:44 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" <
christof
Hi,
it's still that way ... and it's nothing I will be able to come upt with a fix
though. The only Option would be to release Flexmojos in two flavours ... one
that works with the Apache GID and one with the Adobe GID :-( Unfortunately as
soon as I Switch to Apache GIDs the Testsuite completel
Hi Michael,
building FM is a beast ... This is mainly because it's backward compatible with
almost all FDKs available. Unfortunately you need all of them in the Testsuite.
But I guess that you usually don't need the testharnes to run. Especially this
is guaranteed to fail when building FM with
Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type "swc", "rsl" and
"caching". Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files from
maven "swc", "swf" or "swz". The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls have
dependencies of type "Caching" and therefore maven Looks for swz fi
swc
rsl
Again, thanks everyone for the help.
Michael
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [via Apache Flex Development]
[mailto:ml-node+s247n29584...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, Septemb
, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
getAdvancedTelemetry()
If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect
that to cause conflicts?
On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK yo
st what I have
online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them if needed.
Michael
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [via Apache Flex Development]
[mailto:ml-node+s247n29598...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM
To: Scharp, Michael
Subject:
Hi,
I remember that using custom property proxies in BlazeDS I was able to adjust
the serialization exactly the way I wanted to. Unfortunately this was in an
older Project ... Hopefully I can have a look for it this Weekend and I'll post
it here.
Chris
Well as far as I know, you don't need a license to use Charts and the ADG with
Apache Flex at least I wouln'd know where to get such a license, if it was
needed ;-)
So just ignore that for now :-)
I too have several warnings that I tend to live with ... they never were such a
pita that I bother
I am currently using the 30 Day Trial of the Creative Cloud Service. In
gengeral it seems possible to "purchase" Scout as part of the All In package,
but I couldn't find a way to purchase it separately.
So that sucks :-(
Chris
Von: Maurice Amsellem [ma
It's allways free? ... ok then this doesn't suck at all ;-)
At least it explains why I coulnd't find a package in which I could purchase it.
Von: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2013 11:08
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Bet
Hi,
it seems People have been working on ASDoc judging from the number of mails
regarding ASDoc on the list.
When taking over Flexmojos, my first unit of work was getting the testsuite up
and running again. It seems in the latest Adobe Flex Versions there was some
Major regression. I had to mod
ice.amsel...@systar.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 15:20
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: ASDoc
Are you sure this is a regression?
Can you give an example of ASDOC comment that causes this problem, so that I
can run it on older version of ASDOC tool.
Thanks
Maurice
-Message
that "bug" would have been to remove the second "*" ,
something like:
/*
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
package net.flexmojos.oss.it
what do you think ?
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...
treff: RE: ASDoc
I would rather call that a "bug fix" as the previous versions of ASDoc allowed
invalid html in the asdoc comments, and now it doesn't anymore.
But I won't argue with you.
So let's call it a regression :-).
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-
the ASDOC compiler code at a later time to fix that.
Can you please raise a ticket if you think it deserves a fix.
Otherwise, I will also forget about this ;-)
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : mercredi 23 octobre 20
But nevertheless it would be good to have Errors with Error-Messages that help
track down the problem instead of silently generating XML :-)
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013 00:07
An: dev@flex.apac
Hi,
Well I use the Approach described by Justin not only for providing different
Looks for different Customers, but also for delivering different Skin SWFs for
different Client types: Destop, Destkop-Low-Res, Mobile, Tablet. Depending on
the type of Client, my application loads different SWF m
Still I can't really see what would be the Problem to add the mavenizer to the
Installer? I guess this would resolve any legal Problems. I do see some Major
Speed improvement Option to Switch the Deployer to use Mavens wagon instead of
making hundreds of mvn-calls, but adding the mavenizer to th
Well I remember that I pack up everything in the FDK Directory (leaving away
some stuff) and provide this zip. I also know that in FM this zip is important
and it is used. I guess the Flex-config.xml is probably used as I guess this is
the central Piece of Information in the zip.
I will have a
t allowed in every company the user can manage the repo he wants
to access, in big ones, he has to go by the company one which in return,
proxied the repo they choose.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : lundi 28 oc
om here plus,I
don't think an ApacheFlex VM managed by PMCs and almost dedicated to it will be
"no-name" for long time :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:18:48 +0100
> Subject: AW: Add Mavenizer fu
.
What do you think ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:18:50 +0100
> Subject: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
> Well in that case, I would opt for creating an Apache Flex account at
> s
Hi,
So what would it take for Sonatype to gain such a Distribution license from
Adobe? As far as I see, we actually only Need it for the playerglobal and
airglobal (Please correct me if I'm wrong). At least the number of artifacts
should be minimal and it would allow us to officially deploy the
Flex/Air SDKs even if in case you do it, I will ;-)
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 16:22
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Well at sonaty
nstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:01
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
If I knew how/what, I would contact Sonotype.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofe
l.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:42
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
That will be perfect and really really useful.
Miguel
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 2
Hi Guys,
I am currently talking to Brian Fox from Sonatype. He told me that Sonatype
signed a Distribution Agreement with Adobe had been signed in 2008, but this
has expired 2009, but it seems they are willing to re-sign such an Agreement.
For which parts would we Need an Agreement from Adobe?
gt;
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre
>2013 17:57 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: License Stuff
>
>
>
>On 10/29/13 7:16 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
> wrote:
>
>>Hi Guys,
>>
>>I
It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI Servers ...
how do you want to handle them?
I would like to keep the maven build as normal as possible.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:3
I gave Brian the Alex' contact. Hopefully Alex will be able to give him the
contact he needs to sort this out.
It seems easy to ask for the permission to redistribute, but I doubt it will be
that easy to actually receive the permission to do so .. so keep your fingers
crossed.
Chris
-Ursp
as heavy and it
was only one Flex Lib built by Maven.
How do you think we can deploy our not Maven built SDK artifacts in the
Sonatype way ? can it accept a compress file as a bundle of all signed
artifacts or something else ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : christofer.d...@c-war
Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: License Stuff
On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess
>this would
It's not just the pom, but the directory structure and the naming of the file
... so all of these would have to be adjusted.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:46
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: License
Hi Frederic,
but that's not quite true ... each maven repo has a root and relative to that
the groupId, artifactId and version make up the relative path finished by the
file name containing the artifactId, version and classifier.
In Flexmojos I handle the config.zip in a way that it is fetched
Hi,
today I committed some changes to the Mavenizer Tool.
Change 1 made sure all SDKs (Flex and Air) are processed in the right order
regarding the versions of the SDKs.
Change 2 is a new Deployer "SDKInVMDeployer" which no longer needs Maven to
deploy the Mavenized files as it uses Aether dir
r 2013 16:17
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Updated Mavenizer
Hi Christofer,
Sorry if I'm a little bit disconnected but, which is the current state of the
new maven-flex-plugin and when will it be released?
Thanks!
2013/11/3 christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> Hi,
>
> today I
Hi,
sorry for this eventually stupid question, but I recently "remembered" that
there were some issues with Flexmojos regarding building of Mobile
applications. It seems the normal Flexmojos couldn't build Air applications for
mobile devices. Unfortunately I have never built any mobile-air apps
Hi Piotr,
Having a look at the code and the exception, I find this error relatively
strange. Googling a Little, I could see that Integer.compare was introduced in
Java 1.7 ... think I'll overwork this to make the mavenizer work in 1.6 too.
For now changing the line in the exception to this:
Ok ... so I updated the class ... should work now :-)
Thanks for reporting this.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2013 16:07
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: Updated Mavenizer
Hi
unning FM with maven 3.1.1 ? Should I raise an issue
somewhere ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-----
De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : dimanche 3 novembre 2013 16:00
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Updated Mavenizer
Hi,
today I committed some chan
It's acutally pretty important that B also implements IA ... so an "instanceof"
or "is" check should work as well as it should be possible to cast instaces A
and B to IA.
Chris
Von: Erik de Bruin [e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. November 20
Hi,
I have recently extedned Flexmojos to support the advanced telemetry compiler
flag. Also I have created unit-tests that sort of test that functionality.
Unfortunately I can simply see that below flex 4.10 that flag is simply not
supported by the compiler. I can't however check if the file i
e swf to enable telemetry. I
> don't see this tag supported in Apache Flex.
>
>
> -Darrell Loverin
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:30 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have recent
Ok ... so I just had another look,
- unpacked an swf that was not enabled
- then enabled that SWF
- unpacked that content
- loaded both files in a text-compare tool
So it seems that the difference is simplywithin the first 7 bytes
Not Enabled: FWS0J+
Enabed: FWS4J+
(There seems to be some sort
decode the SWF. There are SWF decoding classes in
modules/swfutils/src/. SWFDump just calls SwfxPrinter.java.
-Alex
On 11/17/13 10:50 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Ok ... so I just had another look,
>- unpacked an swf that was not enabled
>- then enabled that
Hi Cosma,
as Toni already confirmed, the mavenizer is currently the easiest way to create
maven artifacts from a Flex SDK you downloaded using the Downloader.
The Mavenizer doesn't actually require the Air SDK, the problem was, that the
Mavenizer is able to mavenize any Flex SDK starting from Ad
be a bash/batch
wrapper file. On the other hand, this could be totally avoided if we plan to go
ahead in managing the mavenizer from the installer.
2013/11/19 OmPrakash Muppirala
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
> christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
be totally avoided if we plan to go ahead in managing the
> mavenizer from the installer.
>
>
> 2013/11/19 OmPrakash Muppirala
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
> > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi C
t to help out new users, we could try to provide a
> > streamlined, step-by-step guide referred to the latest Apache Flex
> > version, along
> with a
> > convenience link to a compiled jar of the mavenizer tool and maybe a
> > bash/batch wrapper file. On the other h
ts are prepared and deployed in order to be used by other
> > > developers, so we should probably warn users about this.
> > >
> > > If we want to help out new users, we could try to provide a
> streamlined,
> > > step-by-step guide referred to the latest Apache F
at 11:47 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Hi Cosma,
>
> as Toni already confirmed, the mavenizer is currently the easiest way
> to create maven artifacts from a Flex SDK you downloaded using the Downloader.
> The Mavenizer doesn't ac
Sorry ... Flexmojos 6.x uses com.adobe.flex and Flexmojos 7.x org.apache.flex
:-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. November 2013 22:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Questions about current
t the wiki page: "The actual Mavenizer
> (SDKDeployer)" maybe should be "... (SDKGenerator)"? (If it is
> referred to the related class name) Il 19/nov/2013 22:47
> "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" < christofer.d...@c-ware.de> ha scritto:
>
>>
ion is actually the same when
> generated from a mac/win FDK. Probably, many of the differences will emerge
> once mobile packaging will be supported by flexmojos?
>
> I can provide the output of the diff runs, if required..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 20
kages created with different build run?)
> >
> > Then I run the mavenizer, and compared the output: the swc and jar
> > differences are clearly still there, but the file set is identical (no
> > additional file or artifacts are generated).
> >
> > So, it seems
Hi,
I am currently in the process of migrating all of my applications to FM7 and
Flex 4.11, I just noticed that my mavenizer includes the experimental_mobile
lib in with the rest of the normmal framework. The reason is that it is not
located in the mobile subdirectory. Is there a reason for thi
I would volunteer to do the BlazeDS testing as I have real interest on working
on BlazeDS (I do have quite a set of improvements, I would like to address as
soon as it is donated).
Chris
Von: Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Novemb
Just my 50ct to this Topic ...
you are talking about the demo in which you can select Nokia phones depending
on different aspects ... how about changing this to: "Apache Flex Commiter"
selection.
Each Member of the Flex Team that wants to be part of this sends a Picture and
fills out a short
I see it exactly the same way (Except for the thing with the letters and the
number) ;-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013 12:52
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex chair
I didn't care
Just to understand the current Position:
- Alex is currently the chair and would volunteer to continue, but never has
stated that he would aktually like to stay in that Position (It's more the
others stating that they would want him to stay)
- Justin actively would like to be the chair and would
Just stumbled over this thread after working through my Mailbox after my
holiday ... What should I do, if I'm not on that list?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Januar 2013 18:45
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff:
makes him a "official"
committer.
Mike
Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski :
> With one exception (a newly added committer), chances are you are not
> an official committer to the project at this time.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:39 AM, christofer.d...
, but since you aren't listed, you need to copy/paste
a new entry for yourself. Let me know if you need help with that portion.
-Nick
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:03 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Eventually I missed something on this list,
Hi Amit,
could you please check this document:
https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Setting+up+Flex+to+communicate+with+Apache+CXF+web+service+using+Aegis+databinding.
I did some work with Flex and Webservices a few years ago and did have some
trouble with it. Debugging everything a
Hi,
I just wanted to add an issue to the Mavenizer and didn't quite know what
version I should use in the issue.
Would it be possible to add a version "Maven-Flex-Plugin 1.0" or something like
this to Jira to bundle all of the Issues related to Mavenizer and the upcoming
plugin?
As I am current
Thanks for that :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2013 12:22
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Adding a "Version" to Jira for the Flex Maven support?
Hi,
> I just wanted to add an issue to the Mavenizer
nk you you make a very clear and sensible case.
+1 to accepting Velo's donation.
On 24 January 2013 12:22, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after me telling the other Flexmojos users on the FM Mailinglist that
> we are working on a bran
?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Greg Reddin [mailto:gred...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013 17:57
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Donation of Flexmojos
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:12 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Yea
: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2013 18:28
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Donation of Flexmojos
On 1/24/13 9:17 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Well I talked to Velo ... the problem is that he thinks that there are
> about
> 100 people who have contributed stuf
: Donation of Flexmojos
Hi Chris,
Will FM continue to be pushed to the same maven repo ? in this case the Velo's
rights have to be transmitted as well ?
-Fred
-Original Message-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:18
>From looking at a commit from Velo on May 27 2012 he replaced the Apache 2.0
>licesne with the GNU license and removed any other licensing header from files
>in the repo ... so I guess Flexmojos trunk is now under GNU General public
>license. But ... It seems that we could assume that the Contr
doing the necessary housekeeping so he
changed it back again).
So ... does this have any impact on the plans to donate? Is it now harder to
donate or does it make stuff even easier?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
G
Hi guys,
just wanted to inform you that I just updated FM6.x to reflect a lot of
feedback from the community and latest changes to the Mavenizer
(https://github.com/chrisdutz/flexmojos). I think FM6 still needs a little
working on the Air side. Unfortunately I don't use Air at all so I could us
think this
should do the trick.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Januar 2013 18:02
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Splitting up Flex and Air?
On 1/28/13 12:25 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
I wouldn't recommend using the name Excalibur as I remember Apache Cocoon and
quite a lot of other projects used to use the IoC Container Excalibur, which
seems to be a retired Apache project ... and whenever I think of Excalibur in
the context of IT-Stuff, the second thought "thank god we don't
e end
would be a good idea? We could just call your mavenize ant script from the AIR
app. Please let me know if this is something you would be interested.
I would be glad to help you out with this.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d..
test it, btw, do you mind if I update the mavenizer as when the Flex build
number is 0, instead of having a version number + '.0', I put version number
+ "-SNAPSHOT" ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:44
umber will be set to 0 only if I do a temporary release from the
sources, never in official releases.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:36 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: Splitting up Flex and Air?
Hi Frederic
ment with
an appended build-number.
String sdkVersion = (build.equals("0")) ? version + "-SNAPSHOT"
: version + "." + build;
The build number will be set to 0 only if I do a temporary release from the
sources, never in official releases.
-Fred
-Message
t's apparently not true for
SDK >= 4.8, could we hardcode this as an exception for these 2 libs and assign
the SDK version number for the others ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:42 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject
l
[cid:image001.gif@01CE014F.09C32070]<http://www.benchpark.com/788335/kundenzufriedenheit.htm>
IT- und Systemhäuser<http://www.benchpark.com/it_und_systemhaeuser.htm>
fon: 0 61 54 / 6085790
fax: 0 61 54 / 6247592
mobil: 0171 / 7 444 2 33
email: christofer.d...@c-ware.de<mai
+1 for method overloading from me too
And:
+1 for private/protected constructors :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2013 05:16
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Language features
Nick, +1 or even 10
igine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 12:55 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Updated Mavenizer and FM6
Hi,
just wanted to report that I just committed some changes to the Mavenizer
and Flexmojos6. Now the Mavenizer no longer deploys the Air artifacts as
part o
I have to admit, that I don't quite understand what the inability to create
signed rsls has to do with the usage of rsls themselves.
The problem is that the Flashplayer is able to install rsls that are signed by
Adobe. Usually the Adobe FDK rsls were also available in signed versions (swz
file
t;>>> releases
>>>>>>>> weeks or months.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It was seen as a majority of the Flex work was moving to mobile. On
>>>>>>>> AIR
>>>>>>>> with mobile, there is
Well I run my CI tests for Flexmojos on an Amazon EC2 node ... works fine and
they do have special offers for Open Source and if you only need a Linux node,
it's more or less free :-)
Von: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. F
Hi,
I just read the new Jetbrains Newsletter and stumbled over this article:
http://blogs.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2013/02/06/automatically-building-pull-requests-from-github-with-teamcity/?utm_source=JetBrains+Newsletter&utm_campaign=ead99a7842-2013_Feb&utm_medium=email
In general they describe ho
Actually, when setting up the Flexmojos CI suite, I gave up trying to setup a
Linux-Based instance. Getting the FlashPlayer to run on a headless machine is
surely a task to make you loose your head.
The only option I saw in having FlashPlayer based unit test running, was the
Windows machine. An
a bill of about $29/month, if you don't count the EC2 instance
> costs.
> >> This will be billed to a somebody's credit card.
> >>
> >
> > Yup, that would be my credit card. I am planning to run it for a
> > couple of months straight and see what
Well I spoke with
Toan Nguyen
Enterprise Sales Manager
I have no idea if there is anyone we should better contact.
All I did was fill out the form on the AWS Sales site. He was the one
responding to this and this morning we spoke a few minutes.
To me it looked as if Amazon wasn't really willin
e a couple of dollars (at least) per month to see this happen,
and I'm sure more people will feel the same way...
EdB
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
> Well I spoke with
> Toan Nguyen
> Enterprise Sales Manager
>
> I have no idea if there i
Thanks for that tip Clint,
Strangely Azure was never on my radar ... now I'm trying to figure out how to
setup the Flexmojos CI Agent on that ;-)
Cool thing is "incoming traffic is free" ... this was the part making my EC2
agent rather expensive (Had to download 16 complete Flex FDK versions wit
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
