Re: [Press] Nice article about Apache Flex 4.10 release

2013-08-07 Thread Thomas Wright
-apache-flex-finally-comes-to-linux > > Nice. > > Ironically of the almost 500 installs we now had (heaps more than I > expected btw) I don't think we've had a single linux install yet :-) > > Justin > > -- *Thomas Wright* Software Engineer Extension: 1054 Office: [801] 464.4600 Corporate Division twri...@yesco.com

Garbage Collection Concern

2013-10-10 Thread Thomas Wright
lems? Second - is there a better way to handle this, or is this legit? Thanks :) -- *Thomas Wright* Software Engineer Extension: 1054 Office: [801] 464.4600 Corporate Division twri...@yesco.com

Re: Garbage Collection Concern

2013-10-10 Thread Thomas Wright
2013 at 9:24 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > On 10/10/2013 11:14 AM, Thomas Wright wrote: > >> Second - is there a better way to handle this, or is this legit? >> > > From an encapsulation perspective, the renderer shouldn't know its > parents. > I always recommen

Re: Garbage Collection Concern

2013-10-11 Thread Thomas Wright
issues? Am I missing the point? I found a few "suggestions" on stackoverflow - but they're just as hacky as anything I've tried or thought of. On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Thomas Wright wrote: > Ok, thanks. > I can't remember why I even started doing thi

Re: Garbage Collection Concern

2013-10-11 Thread Thomas Wright
ted. you could listen for > the list creation complete event (in mxml) and then add listeners for the > itemrenderer events via AS3, eg: > > > > function initList():void > { > myList.addEventListener(....); > > } > > > > On 11/10/2013 16:23, Thomas

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-06-27 Thread Thomas Wright
r repos as well! > > This also gives good indication (compared to other OS projects) to the > activity in the project. > https://www.ohloh.net/p/ApacheFlex > > Thanks, > Justin > > > > -- *Thomas Wright* Software Engineer Extension: 1054 Office: [801] 464.4600 Corporate Division twri...@yesco.com

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-06-27 Thread Thomas Wright
lex developers who mostly migrated towards greener pastures. Ask job-sites > to find out that the amount of Flex jobs is very small. Apache Flex had a > great challenge ahead and, I think, it did not deliver. Sure, it's easy to > debunk saying "Apache is just people, it'

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-06-27 Thread Thomas Wright
. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Thomas Wright wrote: > Strange how things come around. Definitely a surprise to see the poster > find this list and reply. > First off, you absolutely have the right to voice your opinion. You should > never feel like you can't. I hold the

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-06-27 Thread Thomas Wright
t; > S. > > > ah, and on the mailing list bit - I've never been involved in any sort of >> major OS project that doesn't use mailing lists. Even wordpress uses >> mailing lists. I'm curious, how is it that you feel they are archaic? I >> find them ext

Re: Are we "nerd" driven or "business realistic" driven?

2013-06-27 Thread Thomas Wright
> >generally slower than Flex 3. That's no good. > > > >- get rid of mx totally and fill in missing spark parts > > > >- clean and easy to access 3rd party component market / shareplace > > > >- figure out the global chokepoints and improve on speed - either by > > > >changes in the framework, or by putting a pressure on Adobe to refresh > > > >Flash Player. Flex 4 performance is currently a laughing stock. It > > wasn't > > > >few years ago, but now it is, especially when compare to fast > Javascript > > > >VM's. It's bizarre trying to explain your client that you have to > > > >virtualize lists and that itemrenderers are slow, even if you go knee > > > >deep in pure as approach. Yes, everything can be optimized, but it's > > > >matter of time and price. If you release a product, it has to deliver > on > > > >what's promised. People don't have time to optimize on their own and > > > >learn the product. If you don't deliver, people will simply go away. > And > > > >away then went. > > > >- arm Flex beautifully for mobile. I was a huge "nay" for Flex mobile > in > > > >the beginning, but more and more I see point of it. Obviously, > there's a > > > >lot here that depends on AIR, iOS/Android compiler and Flash player. > But > > > >it doesn't mean that Flex cannot go forward with this. > > > >Where does that leave us? > > > > > > > >Again, I feel really bad that this landed on this list in such a way. > I > > > >don't mean to insult or offend or discourage people who are working > here > > > >on their projects. I respect your skills and your time which are often > > > >far far exceeding what I could even think is possible. But this is the > > > >"outside world" view, the "business realistic" view. Ask banks, who > > > >previously invested heavily in Flex. Ask software houses, interactive > > > >agencies. Ask Flex developers who mostly migrated towards greener > > > >pastures. Ask job-sites to find out that the amount of Flex jobs is > very > > > >small. Apache Flex had a great challenge ahead and, I think, it did > not > > > >deliver. Sure, it's easy to debunk saying "Apache is just people, it's > > > >you and me". But maybe this is the main problem. Food for thought. > > > > > > > >Best regards, > > > >Sebastian Zarzycki > > > >Feerie Software > > > >> Hi there, > > > >> > > > >> just wonder what you think about this forum post of the SpiceFactory > > > >>forum [1]: > > > >> > > > >> "With all due respect, I don't believe Apache did anything good with > > > >>Flex. They struggle with a lot of internal bureaucracy and I believe > > > >>that without clear leadership, this "meritocracy" thing just doesn't > > > >>work. For the past year, Apache Flex community debated whether they > > > >>should move to Git and right now when they did, they figured out that > > > >>most people don't know how to use it, etc. etc. In other words, to > much > > > >>"nerd" driven, not enough "business realistic" driven." > > > >> > > > >> [1] http://www.spicefactory.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3803 > > > >> > > > >> -- Sebastian (PPMC) Interaction Designer > > > >> > > > >> Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this > > > >>code: http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample > > > > > > > > > -- *Thomas Wright* Software Engineer Extension: 1054 Office: [801] 464.4600 Corporate Division twri...@yesco.com

Re: About Statege3D in Flex

2013-07-19 Thread Thomas Wright
earch > > from > > >> that experience. There's things to get into account like > accessibility. > > >> > > >> Please could people share in this thread the things they know in order > > to > > >> recopile all info? Is there some things to take into account that > could > > >> make Stage3D not possible for Flex? Could we overpass it and make it > > >> possible? If it would be possible...it will brings real benefits? > > >> > > >> If some work is done in this topic, I'd propose to make focused in > this > > >> particular thing and unlike FlexJS, here I will not try to break > > >> UIComponent in small parts, or break compatibility. Even if it could > be > > >> possible to have a global flag like "enableStage3D" to make our apps > > run on > > >> Stage3D if is true or remain in normal display layer, it could be > great. > > >> > > >> Thanks in advance for any insight regarding this topic. > > >> > > >> Best > > >> > > >> Carlos > > >> > > > > > -- *Thomas Wright* Software Engineer Extension: 1054 Office: [801] 464.4600 Corporate Division twri...@yesco.com