Hi,
Id there a source release anyway we can check I’m not seeing one at
builds.apacge.org - but could of missed it.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I don't understand. Under the link which I provided you don't see sources
packaged to zip?
Thanks, Piotr
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017, 08:20 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Id there a source release anyway we can check I’m not seeing one at
> builds.apacge.org - but could of missed it.
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi,
> I don't understand. Under the link which I provided you don't see sources
> packaged to zip?
Sorry the link you provided was being unresponsive for me and I thought we also
have a build on Apache’s build servers but was unable to find it.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I took a quick look and looks like there’s a couple of things that need to be
fixed:
- there are things bundled that perhaps should’t be i.e. ant_on_air/tests/temp
- NOTICE has wrong year
I’m currently travelling and may not be able to look at it again for several
days.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I’ve not had a chance to look at this in full but a quick inspection shows that
License is missing this MIT licensed file (copyright Dave Gandy). [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1.
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/utils/AwesomeUtils.as
Hi Justin,
Is it not enough if that file has header with those license information ?
We need to have separate file ?
Piotr
2017-11-03 17:44 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> I’ve not had a chance to look at this in full but a quick inspection shows
> that License is missing this MIT licensed
Hi,
Both issue has been fixed. You can check sources [1].
[1]
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-utilities_installer/1335/
Thanks, Piotr
2017-11-03 17:19 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> I took a quick look and looks like there’s a couple of things that need to
> be fixed:
>
Hi,
> Is it not enough if that file has header with those license information ?
It’s enough to satisfy the MIT license conditions but not quite enough for ASF
policy. [1] Adding it to LICENSE also make it clear to any users that their’s
MIT licensed software included without them looking for it
Cool! License has been added.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017, 03:14 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Is it not enough if that file has header with those license information ?
>
> It’s enough to satisfy the MIT license conditions but not quite enough for
> ASF policy. [1] Adding it to LICENSE
Just subscribed to post that I found an issue using the Flex 3.2 installer on
a new Mac laptop with OS 10.13. I filed a Jira ticket[1]. Just like iOS, for
Mac 10.13 it seems like if your application makes HTTP calls, you need to
include in the Info.plist the NSAppTransportSecurity/NSAllowsArbitrary
Hi,
I have I think so same Mac version - need to confirm and didn't have such
issue. Could you try Installer 3.3 and let us know whether you experience
same issue.
Piotr
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017, 03:42 AmigaAbattoir
wrote:
> Just subscribed to post that I found an issue using the Flex 3.2 installer
I updated and ran the approval script. It found some tests without
headers. I added headers and kicked off a new nightly build. Looks like
it takes a couple of hours to build on my slow Azure VM. Other than that
and the license thing Justin found, I think it is ok to release.
-Alex
On 11/3/17
I updated and ran the approval script. Things look ok to me.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 11/3/17, 7:56 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have I think so same Mac version - need to confirm and didn't have such
>issue. Could you try Installer 3.3 and let us know whether you experience
>same issue.
>
>P
13 matches
Mail list logo
