I happened to be testing against FlexJSStore at the time I discovered the
need for this, and there is some removing going on.
I think I improved performance compared to how it was originally by
removing coercion in js and using local references for some of the repeat
listener references/avoiding r
I suspect that the if(b == true) and if(b == false) patterns aren't out of
the ordinary in real-world code. I hope the default will be to initialize
Booleans to false and that you'll need to opt into the other behavior.
- Josh
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Thanks for point
Hi,
> If a variable is of type Boolean in AS (not JS), is there a
> difference between these three patterns.
No as a boolean can only have the values of true and false and defaults to
false in AS.
If you take the same code and run it in the browser it can now have three
values, true, false and
Please note that I will be traveling for the next few days. In any case I
will be waiting for the artifacts to be propagated through the mirrors
before pushing a FlexJS npm release.
Hopefully the timelines will coincide. Worst case, there will be a bit of
a lag for the npm release.
Thanks,
Om
Hi,
And this particular rabbit hole goes a lot deeper.
Any guesses what these two expression give?
false && undefined
undefined && false
If you expect them to have the same answer you would be incorrect.
Does this matter? Well try this code on both platforms:
var a:Boolean;
var b:Boolean = fa
The general principle is optimization. Optimization looks for specific
patterns. What you wrote below is not one of the patterns. Would be fun
to see how often that pattern exists though. IMO, it would not make sense
to initialize every boolean because 1% of the boolean expressions require
opti
Yes, thanks for removing unnecessary coercions.
While debugging examples, I also noted the removal of Layout in Panel.
Makes me wonder if we our container architecture/lifecycle is designed
properly. The base classes may need to have a pattern for "proxies" and
"wrappers", which may be the essenc
HI,
> The general principle is optimization. Optimization looks for specific
> patterns. What you wrote below is not one of the patterns.
Not one of what patterns?
BTW Initialising the Boolean to false also optimises the seed by a factor of
two. i.e. twice as fast.
> Would be fun to see how
Hi,
I think we may be talking cross purposes here to be clear - IMO this is not an
optimisation issue this it’s a serious bug.
Justin
Hi Harbs,
I haven't touch subject, but one question - Do you have in mind Basic List
or MDL List ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-List-reordering-tp62261p62262.html
Sent from th
Basic.
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:47 AM, piotrz wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> I haven't touch subject, but one question - Do you have in mind Basic List
> or MDL List ?
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-de
I played around with the HTML drag and drop API not too long ago. It was
pretty intuitive and easy to work with.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTML_Drag_and_Drop_API
- Josh
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Has anyone done any work on reordering items in lists
FlexJSStore example uses DragDrop to drag from what looks like a TileList
to a regular List, but neither are actually based on List. But there might
be code in there you can leverage.
HTH,
-Alex
On 6/9/17, 6:19 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I played around with the HTML drag and drop API not too l
In case anybody is wondering, I'm having computer troubles and family
stuff that is delaying the RC.
-Alex
On 6/8/17, 11:04 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>I just run Maven build [1] and it's blue, so from my point we are ready!
>:)
>
>[1]
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
As long as it’s computer troubles and not family troubles… ;-)
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> In case anybody is wondering, I'm having computer troubles and family
> stuff that is delaying the RC.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/8/17, 11:04 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>
>> I just run Maven b
Hi,
after some weeks being technically offline at home, I'm hopefully back in
the game now;-)
I've just downloaded the nightly build using the installer and tried to
compile my little test app
with no success [1].
I noticed that the target folder contains just a weird javascript file.
I've already
Did you delete your ./target/javascript directory before compiling with the
new SDK? I don't see why that would cause this problem, but it's worth a
try. Good to get in the habit when switching SDKs anyway, since some old
framework JS files might get stale.
I've seen some issues with the format of
Josh Tynjala wrote
> Did you delete your ./target/javascript directory before compiling with
> the
> new SDK?
I'm pretty sure that I've done that all the time without any success.
After I've changed the "output" option as you mentioned the first time
including deleting the target folder it works
Hi,
This is vote for the 0.8.0 release of the FalconJX (and Falcon)
compilers. There is no separate Falcon-only release package at
this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as
upstream packages for the FlexJS release.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist
This is the discussion thread.
Changes in this RC include:
Thanks,
Alex Harui
Hi,
This is vote for the 0.8.0 release of Apache FlexJS.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.8.0/rc1/
Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
approving a release?', at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.h
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
Thanks for pointing it was == and not ===, but I must still be missing
something. If a variable is of type Boolean in AS (not JS), is there a
difference between these three patterns:
If (b)
If (b == true)
If (b === true)
Or these three?
If (!b)
If (b == false)
If (b === false)
I don't think th
I guess I don't believe that removing beads is so common that every app
needs to carry this code around. I wonder if there is a way to inject
removability as needed.
Having a RemovableXXXLayout could override the strand setter and remove
listeners if the handlers are protected.
Thoughts?
-Alex
24 matches
Mail list logo
