MDL List is extending ListBase (as js:List does). Is a copy/paste of
js:List. I want to start from a working component.
e contains Error object message is: ·org.apache.flex.utils.Language.as
stack is : org.apache.flex.html.beads.DataItemRen -> from here I can't read
nothing more
So you think I mu
Here maybe a clue:
I changed the js-output-type to JSC and I got the following error:
build_example.compilejs:
[echo] Compiling PrintUIManagement.js
[echo] FLEX_HOME: /FlexSDK/FlexJSNightly
[echo] FALCONJX_HOME: /FlexSDK/FlexJSNightly/js
[echo] GOOG_HOME: /FlexSDK/FlexJSNightl
Peter, Alex,
I finaly get it working extending from org.apache.flex.html.List instead of
ListBase...but this seems to me that something is not working ok on
internals, what do you think?
One side effect not related to this problem is that this:
public class List extends org.apache.flex.html.List
Great Piotrz! :)
2016-11-22 8:11 GMT+01:00 piotrz :
> Carlos,
>
> I've also put some effort to add MaterialDesignLite.swc to our nightly
> build
> and it's working. :) Anyone who download nightly can try it from now on. :)
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
What is the purpose of these settings in the compilejs target?
Here is a stripped down project with not much in it.
I copied a lot of the build.xml from the CreateJS project with the exception of
removing the SWF compile. When I remove the SWF compile in the CreateJS
project, it compiles correctly.
I also added arguments for library-path and external-libra
Hi Peter,
another thing I think is "failing" is the fact I need to explicitly set
labelField to "label" or I get [object Object]
I think List should asume labelField is "label" by default like in old Flex
2016-11-21 22:57 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :
> I had an issue today with ComboBox and its model n
Hi,
I'm digging into the FlexJS List, and is a complex component with lots of
beads. But in MDL the structure is simpler.
In MDL there is only a with item elements
in FlexJS we have the List Container (that I can change to ), but then
we have the List DataGroup that is an additional div.
So I
How about extending list but not using ListView? Maybe you can have a different
implementation of IListView where dataGroup references the view element?
If you’re sure there’s not going to be any chrome elements (e.g. TitleBar) then
it seems to me correct to not use a data group on top of the
IIRC There is already a SimpleList component that wraps a Select element.
The List is really meant to introduce the whole custom item renderer
capability.
If you don't need that, just create your own thing. You may not even need
a View on the JS side.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 11/22/16, 4:03 AM, "ca
Please take a look at what I did here.
https://github.com/unhurdle/cep-flexjs/tree/master/CEPTools
I originally tried building the swc using FDT. I thought there was something
wrong there, so I set up an ant build, and that does not contain the JS files
either.
What did I do wrong?
Harbs
I tried to extend from SimpleList, but I get the same output (ul -> div
ListDataGroup -> items)
It seems SimpleList extends Listso all complexity is there :?
2016-11-22 15:25 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> IIRC There is already a SimpleList component that wraps a Select element.
> The List is real
Agreed. It should not do automatic conversions.
Now that you mention it, I’ve been getting Bindable warnings on those classes
for years. Everything worked, so I ignored it, but I would not be surprised if
the warnings were related to this issue.
Thanks for looking into this.
Harbs
On Nov 22,
On 11/22/16, 3:16 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>another thing I think is "failing" is the fact I need to explicitly set
>labelField to "label" or I get [object Object]
>I think List should asume labelField is "label" by default like in old
>Flex
On 11/22/16, 2:36 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>What is the purpose of these settings in the compilejs target?
>
>
>/>
>
>
It allows the build.xml that calls build_example to set some additional
per-example parameters
-Alex
Yes. I know. But what are those CONFIG settings?
The elements are further down.
On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> On 11/22/16, 2:36 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> What is the purpose of these settings in the compilejs target?
>>
>>
>> > />
>>
>>
>
> It
Perhaps Falcon should have a specific compiler error or warning that says
that setters must be public when using [Bindable]. I assume that the
current error is kind of generic, so something more specific would help
make it clear what's wrong and how to fix it.
- Josh
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:48
On 11/22/16, 7:24 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Please take a look at what I did here.
>https://github.com/unhurdle/cep-flexjs/tree/master/CEPTools
>
>I originally tried building the swc using FDT. I thought there was
>something wrong there, so I set up an ant build, and that does not
>contain the JS fil
Where do you see it expecting the Flex structure?
AFAIU, the compile-js target is only needed for the JS suffixed SWCs. All the
regular SWCs have the js in them as well.
Am I missing the boat?
On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:15 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 7:24 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> P
On 11/22/16, 7:43 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>I tried to extend from SimpleList, but I get the same output (ul -> div
>ListDataGroup -> items)
>It seems SimpleList extends Listso all complexity is there :?
Ugh. SimpleList got ruined in the back port fr
On 11/22/16, 8:05 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Yes. I know. But what are those CONFIG settings?
They are just dummy values. AFAIK, there is no way in Ant to and another
tag at execution time. So the only solution I could think of was to put
in lines like:
But if you don'
On 11/22/16, 8:17 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Where do you see it expecting the Flex structure?
That compile-js will find the JS build in frameworks/js/FlexJS/projects
>
>AFAIU, the compile-js target is only needed for the JS suffixed SWCs. All
>the regular SWCs have the js in them as well.
>
>Am I m
I think it should be possible to generate the right code for [Bindable] so
that the setter remains private. But then when the code tries to access
the setter without the "private::" namespace you will get a "read-only"
error.
Regarding Josh's feedback, I'm not sure we should detect a mismatch
bet
If they make the getter public and the setter private, it's probably on
purpose. If the compiler then forces the setter to be public for
[Bindable], it should at least tell them that something probably unexpected
is happening. I think a warning makes sense.
[Bindable(eventName)] is definitely the
Alex, I filed the import issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35179
Thanks
2016-11-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 3:16 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >another thing I think is "failing" is the fact
> Ugh. SimpleList got ruined in the back port from JS to AS.
>
>
So maybe I should wait for some fix on this component?
> It occurred to me though that both SimpleList and List/ListBase are going
> to be oriented towards the "ItemRenderer Factory" API. In such a case,
> there is a dataProvider
On 11/22/16, 9:26 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>If they make the getter public and the setter private, it's probably on
>purpose. If the compiler then forces the setter to be public for
>[Bindable], it should at least tell them that something probably
>unexpected
>is happening. I think a warning m
That works for me. I wonder if we can show a different error if there's a
non-public setter. I remember being confused for a bit the first time I saw
that error about the property being read-only.
- Josh
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 9:26 AM, "Josh Tynja
>
>
> So anyway, what should work is in-line xhtml as the value of the html
> property. IOW a plain text label should look like the following MXML:
>
>
>
>
AFAIK, Button (and not js, only mdl) is the only control that allows "text"
has default property, but others not... maybe text based contro
Well if it were up to me, the Basic List and SimpleList will only support
the dataprovider/factory mechanism and not support setting random
children. Again, I am trying to make sure the Basic set does not have
just-in-case code. I think you've added components that thinly wrap HTML
elements so I
Ah. That’s fine. I just thought I was missing something basic.
Thanks for the explanation. Maybe it would be helpful to put in a comment in
case someone else ends up scratching their head like me?
On Nov 22, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 8:05 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>
On 11/22/16, 2:40 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>There’s not a lot in the project. Please take a look and let me know if
>you can spot what’s wrong.
I don't know if this is the only problem, but I did find a problem that I
should have seen earlier, but I only saw after spending an hour stepping
through
OMG!!!
That was it. Phew! Changing that brought up some (real) errors, and fixing them
gave me proper output.
I guess the question is why the compiler didn’t give a more intelligent error.
Thanks,
Harbs
On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 2:40 AM, "Harbs" wro
I see. I totally did not understand how it’s working. The js build puts the js
files into the swc which is (also?) built by the non-js build.
There are two targets there and I’m not sure I understand what they are both
doing: compile-js-swc and compile-asjs.
It looks like compile-asjs is what p
On 11/22/16, 11:26 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>OMG!!!
I used other acronyms, but it was mostly amusing to me that neither of us
saw this.
>
>I guess the question is why the compiler didn’t give a more intelligent
>error.
The compiler seems to think it will find errors in the parsing, but not in
the
I've been meaning to create a JIRA issue for another MXML parsing issue
that I recently discovered.
If you have an un-closed XML comment
On 11/22/16, 11:04 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I see. I totally did not understand how it’s working. The js build puts
>the js files into the swc which is (also?) built by the non-js build.
>
>There are two targets there and I’m not sure I understand what they are
>both doing: compile-js-swc and compil
On 11/22/16, 11:54 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I've been meaning to create a JIRA issue for another MXML parsing issue
>that I recently discovered.
>
>If you have an un-closed XML comment
OK. I’ll see if I can get it right…
We’ll see tomorrow.
Thanks,
Harbs
On Nov 22, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/16, 11:04 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I see. I totally did not understand how it’s working. The js build puts
>> the js files into the swc which is (also?) built
I’m now on to the next issue:
I’m getting lots of errors like this:
(and by lots, I mean 1300 lines worth of output)
I have lots of Node.js code in my project and all the require() statements are
output automatically.
It seems to me that the variable declarations should be scoped to the file (o
Yes, I probably should have made those automatically generated require()
calls work similarly to "internal" classes that appear after the package
block, where they end up being stored statically on the class in the
generated JS instead of globally. The redeclared variable warnings should
be safe to
There’s a number of different classes of errors I’m getting.
Some I believe to be blockers:
Redeclared variable
constant fs assigned a value more than once
variable XML is undeclared
variable Buffer is undeclared
WARNING: externs/assert.js:142: WARNING - accessing name assert in externs has
no e
Let's say that list will be built using components LI, OL - How from the
developer point of view use case of such list will look like ?
something
something
For me it is nothing more than HTML, if SimpleList will give me:
- This is the
simplicity which I love and would like to see. Even if we
> Well if it were up to me, the Basic List and SimpleList will only support
> the dataprovider/factory mechanism and not support setting random
> children.
But change itemrenderer class factory is something needed, if not we're
making the list use cases restricted.
> Again, I am trying to make
I saw some of the things reported here of bad closing tags giving some
strange errors...thanks that I saw it quickly in my case, but blinded by
pursuing my own problems at that moment does not make me think in report
this. But it's clear those are errors very visible to people working just
few hour
I'm pretty sure that the "variable XML is undeclared" warning is unrelated
to node.swc.
I noticed that the globals.js extern was not included in the node.swc, for
some reason. It appears to compile fine if I add it, so that was probably
just a simple mistake. That should get rid of the issue with
I just remembered that there are two kinds of "lists" in HTML. There is
the Select element which has a selection model, and then there is ol/ul
which has no selection model. What kind of list is MDL's list? Does it
support selection?
IMO, ol/ul are for displaying a list of items without a selec
2016-11-22 22:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> I just remembered that there are two kinds of "lists" in HTML. There is
> the Select element which has a selection model, and then there is ol/ul
> which has no selection model. What kind of list is MDL's list? Does it
> support selection?
>
> IMO, ol/u
On 11/22/16, 4:15 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>2016-11-22 22:56 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> I just remembered that there are two kinds of "lists" in HTML. There is
>> the Select element which has a selection model, and then there is ol/ul
>> which has no sel
Hi Carlos,
I see that you are hardly working on List and refactoring. :) I think I will
take another component and it will be Chips.
What do you think - To have one basic Chips and other things like
DeletableChips and ContactChips would be a Beads?
What do you think ?
Piotr
Hi Alex,
That would be ok, but I would like to provide data in flex way vía data
provider, since is the way we have to populate List in Flex... Is like
other components I introduce yesterday. I marked here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Table+Of+Components
to redactor and provi
51 matches
Mail list logo
