But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the Ant
build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib ... we
should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't really know what that's doing).
I'll have a look at a compilation with my Profiler as soon as I have
Well it's doing two builds, cause it's explicitly configured that way.
If you want to do only one, take out the "executions" block.
If you want that one execution to be js and not swf, just add the
"outputJavaScript=true" option to the main configuration block.
I configured the compilation for
Hi Chris,
I see the arquetype generated pom only refers to one execution. This is an
excerpt form my pom.xml (not notified by me):
compile-javascript
compile
compile-app
true
The plugin defines one execution per default, the "execution" element has a
different id and hereby adds a second execution called "compile-javascript".
You can also see it in the build there should be an execution
"default-compile-app". If you move the "" option is moved to
the main configurat
Hi Carlos,
just noticed that I didn't respond to the email, but just started implementing
it ;-)
The feature is now built into the maven-plugin and you should be able to use it.
You can have a look at the test of this feature in the new "testsuite" module
in the framework repo at:
flexjs-fr
Hi,
I am currently digging though some things Carlos recent posts made me aware of.
Especially his comment about the maven build double compiling stuff. I did
stumble over something while setting up a first pure-js testsuite test.
In this module I want to create the JS version of the HelloWor
And what's even stranger, but I forgot to mention in my last post.
The compiler produces the JS debug version correctly and it seems to be
runnable, but as the compiler returns a set of problems, the build fails.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Mittwoch,
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the quick implementation! Just tested in a project and is
working fine :)
2016-10-05 15:13 GMT+02:00 Christofer Dutz :
> Hi Carlos,
>
>
> just noticed that I didn't respond to the email, but just started
> implementing it ;-)
>
> The feature is now built into the maven-plugi
In my changes yesterday, I think what I did was move the compile-js mojo
to the compile phase along with the compile-as and compile-extern mojo.
All three compiles are needed to build SWCs, but only two are needed to
build an example/app. There is no need for a compile-extern. Does
compile-extern
On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't really know what that's
>doing).
>
>
>I'll have a l
On 10/5/16, 8:20 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't
Update: The compiler isn't assigning private access getters to the
Watchers, but it is assigning it to the Bindings, so I made changes to the
Binding code in FlexJS to deal with it and things seem to be working.
Maybe we will find a reason to put the getters on the Watchers some day.
Any voluntee
So I replaced the @expose usage with @export on Accessors and looked into
why things don't work when you do that. It probably is a bug in GCC, but
I saw an article where GCC developers say that all static definitions are
considered separate "globals" and not properties of something. It is an
inte
This seems like a reasonable enough workaround. I really wish GCC weren't
always giving us so many issues. I know many of them are "by design", but
it gets frustrating very quickly.
- Josh
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> So I replaced the @expose usage with @export on Access
I have not been following this discussion very well, so I’m not sure I got the
issue, but will this prevent optimization of minimized code which accesses
static properties?
On Oct 5, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Anyway, I wanted to see if anyone objects to this change before I push it
On 10/5/16, 10:43 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I have not been following this discussion very well, so I’m not sure I
>got the issue, but will this prevent optimization of minimized code which
>accesses static properties?
I think I have discovered that static getters/setters were never getting
renamed
So, this is only an issue for static functions and vars? Constants should be
fine. Right?
On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/5/16, 10:43 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I have not been following this discussion very well, so I’m not sure I
>> got the issue, but will this prev
And what’s the reason we’re not just using Foo.someOtherStaticProperty? Is this
a getter issue?
On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/5/16, 10:43 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I have not been following this discussion very well, so I’m not sure I
>> got the issue, but will th
On 10/5/16, 11:10 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>So, this is only an issue for static functions and vars? Constants should
>be fine. Right?
Actually, only for static getters and setters. The output for vars,
consts and functions are not being changed at all and GCC will rename them
and set up aliases fo
On 10/5/16, 11:13 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>And what’s the reason we’re not just using Foo.someOtherStaticProperty?
>Is this a getter issue?
Getters/Setters need to be defined via Object.defineProperty. It is the
only way to access a function via a property name (without using
parentheses). IOW
Hi,
I was going to test Alex work on the "binding issue" but the maven
distribution build still fails for me [1].
Any hints?
Thanks,
Olaf
[1] Errror log:
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Flex - FlexJS: F
Hey all,
I just wanted to drop in and let everyone know that we here at Prominic
have just deployed the 1.2.1 version of Moonshine for Windows. Try it out,
run a FlexJS project! For those of you unfamiliar with the Moonshine IDE,
visit www.moonshine-ide.com, where you can also find the source an
I downloaded this, and Avast! virus scan blocked it because of something
called DRep.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Walker L. Dalton
wrote:
>
>
> Hey all,
>
> I just wanted to drop in and let everyone know that we here at Prominic
> have just deployed the 1.2.1 version of Moonshine for Windows
Alex Harui wrote
> Update: The compiler isn't assigning private access getters to the
> Watchers, but it is assigning it to the Bindings, so I made changes to the
> Binding code in FlexJS to deal with it and things seem to be working.
Thanks Alex, I'll test it soon!
Olaf
--
View this message
Hi Andrew,
We will look into this immediately. Can you directly send us a screen
shot of what you saw?
Thank you,
Justin Hill
My Apache Flex community contribution is working on the open source
Moonshine-IDE.com for FlexJS.
From: Andrew Wetmore
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: "Just
Hi,
Anyone else have anything to add before I start working on this?
Thanks,
Justin
If you really need the screen shot I could try to download it again, but I
would really prefer not to until you have investigated it. Have you tried
downloading it yourself onto a computer with a standard anti-virus system
running?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Justin M. Hill wrote:
> Hi Andre
Hey everyone,
For anyone receiving the 'DRep' infection message from Avast! when running
the Moonshine IDE, please note that 'DRep' stands for DomainRep or Domain
Reputation, it does NOT mean it is infected or has a virus. Here is more
information on DomainRep from the Avast forums:
https://
Hi, Olaf,
I 'm updated and run the 3 builds and all is working for me
Are you using : mvn clean install -DskipTests ?
My build ends in Archetypes: Library and I'm not making distribution ( I
did this some days ago), but I think you don't need it
2016-10-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 OK :
> Hi,
> I was goi
Ok sorry... I notice that your goal is really build a distribution :)
I test right now and is working for me with the following line:
mvn clean install -P build-distribution
-DdistributionTargetFolder=/Users/carlosrovira/Desktop/dist
check:
http://flex.apache.org/maven/flexjs/latest-dev/build.h
Looks like Olaf is having problems getting the AIR 20.0 SDK as a Maven
artifact. I don't remember how I went and got that.
Olaf, what version of Maven are you running?
-Alex
On 10/5/16, 2:52 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Ok sorry... I notice that your goal i
Aside from the Olaf problem, I tried to use my dist folder with NextGenAS
without luck (recognizes the folder as an SDK, but doesn't find the
compiler).
If I download a 0.8 flexjs nightly it works ok. So my question is... should
SDK form nightly has the same structure and purpose that a maven
distr
I tried installing on my Windows 10 computer. I downloaded the .exe but
when I run it, nothing seems to happen. Any hints?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/5/16, 1:07 PM, "Walker L. Dalton" wrote:
>
>
>Hey all,
>
>I just wanted to drop in and let everyone know that we here at Prominic
>have just deployed
Alex Harui wrote
> I tried installing on my Windows 10 computer. I downloaded the .exe but
> when I run it, nothing seems to happen. Any hints?
Hi Alex, it's a new thing we recently noticed in Windows 10 the installer
initially blocked by an warning screen - SmartScreen. It's more like the
Avast
Fred Thomas did some work in this area about a year ago. In the
flex-oem-compiler module that FB (and maybe other IDEs) use to talk to the
compiler, he added a FLEXJS_DUAL -js-output-type. Not sure how well it
works.
Thinking about this some more we'd have to have the same configuration
options
I would also prefer that Justin contact them as an individual. I think it’s
less confrontational. I see no reason to do so as “an official representative
of the PMC”. I see no benefit in doing so.
On Oct 4, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Are other PMC members ok with approaching the up
36 matches
Mail list logo
