On 9/19/16, 7:51 PM, "lizhi" wrote:
>thanks,is it this ok https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35133?
>
Yes, I renamed the subject to make it a bit more obvious what the issue is.
Thanks
-Alex
Hi,
> Are you proposing to get the OpenFL community to accept headers on their
> source
> files by submitting a pull request on their repos and then replicating
> that header under the ASF header in Matrix.as?
No I was going to add a header to make it clear that the code wasn’t originally
Apac
For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I
took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods.
On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> AIUI, parts of OpenFL code was used for portions of Matrix.as. We are not
> consuming their entire release art
Hi,
> For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I
> took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods.
Which is enough, converting an algorithm from one language to another doesn’t
change the original copyright. Just reading someones other source code (ra
Well if it's fork=no you use the VM of the Build therefore you provide the VM
args to Ant, if you have fork=yes, it creates a dedicated VM for the
compilation and you have to manually pass in arguments to the creation of that
VM ...
... you could also try the Maven build ;-)
Chris
_
I'm no lawyer, but even if you only copy+paste an If statement that's actually
a derivate work ... at least that's the way I understood it ... please correct
me if I'm wrong.
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. September 2016 10:18:34
An: dev@flex.apache.
Me neither, and I’m happy to accept whatever others tell me is required. I was
just trying to clarify exactly what was done.
On Sep 20, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> I'm no lawyer, but even if you only copy+paste an If statement that's
> actually a derivate work ... at least that'
On 9/20/16, 3:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>I'm no lawyer, but even if you only copy+paste an If statement that's
>actually a derivate work ... at least that's the way I understood it ...
>please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
I am not a lawyer either, but my understanding is different.
Let's
IMO, there are 3 categories of inclusion:
1) Bundling an entire release artifact.
2) Bundling an entire file from a release artifact where the top-level
license applies to that file.
2a) and then modifying that file
3) Copying portions of an existing work into an ASF-owned fie.
Then there is a di
Hi,
> Matrix.as [4] currently has the following added by me:
>
> // Implementation derived fromL
> // https://github.com/openfl/openfl/blob/develop/openfl/geom/Matrix.hx
> // available under MIT License.
>
> I added this after the release.
Which is OKish but we are not complying with it’s M
I am going to avoid setting too many expectations about timing for this
stuff in the future :)
I'm still working on this, just in case you wondered, but have had to
balance my time out with income-related work.
Just so you know where I am heading with this, I got it to a minimum level
where I cou
On 9/20/16, 4:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> Remember that a senior Apache member recommended filing an
>> upstream issue in this email [5].
>
>That refers to a missing NOTICE file which is a different issue, how
>notice files are handled is ASF policy and 3rd parties don’t need to
>follow
Hi,
> I will ask on legal discuss whether he was addressing this particular
> scenario or any third-party with documentation issues.
OK.
> Maybe I wasn't clear, but my thought was that if you subset a license, you
> should copy the relevant bits into your license instead of creating a new
> fil
13 matches
Mail list logo
