Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

I have published flexjs 0.7.0 on the npm repository. You can install it by running: npm install flexjs -g Before publishing, I confirmed that the npm flexjs package does indeed download from the mirrors: == *Downloading Apache FlexJS from mirror: http://mirror.symnds.com/softwar

AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first discussing starting a release. The discussion sort of dried out without a resolution, then when it came to the release, he mentioned it again. But again no action was taken. So I too se

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

I’m confused about which issue you are referring to. Before the release was cut he brought up some issues related to code which might have not have compatible licensing, We acted on that pretty much immediately. During the release process, he brought up the fact that the full MIT license wordi

AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

I still have one discussion in mind with the replacing of License Headers in files as part of the Patch process. I guess this isn't resolved yet. I responded more general as the other responses seemed to refer to someone continuously doing something :-) Chris

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On 9/15/16, 12:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. > > >Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first >discussing starting a release. The discussion sort of dried out without a >resolution, then when it came to the release, he mentione

CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

On 9/15/16, 1:39 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I still have one discussion in mind with the replacing of License Headers >in files as part of the Patch process. I guess this isn't resolved yet. I >responded more general as the other responses seemed to refer to someone >continuously doing somet

FlexJS asdoc Top Level classes

I was talking to someone who is using FlexJS to build an app. One thing they mentioned is that they found it confusing that top level classes like String, Array, etc. were not in the FlexJS asdoc, but others like QName and Namespace were. Now, I understand that we have custom implementations of Na

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Sep 15, 2016 8:31 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 9/15/16, 12:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > > >Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. > > > > > >Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first > >discussing starting a release. The discussion sort of dried out witho

[ANNOUNCE} Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache FlexJS SDK 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX Compiler 0.7.0. Apache Flex is a highly productive, open source application framework for building and maintaining expressive applications that deploy consistently on all major browsers

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On 9/15/16, 10:13 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >I would leave it up to the Release Manager to make the call on a case by >case basis, whether to hold the release or to punt it to the next release. I agree that an RM can ignore the vote and cancel an RC, but

[FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

Hi, I notice that we should update the particular wiki articles cause ViewBase was replaced by View with 0.7.0. It could be annoying if anyone new just copy and paste the code and fail. I've just tried to edit an article [1] but it seems to me that I've not sufficient permissions. (Can't see any ed

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

Last time I tried, I also did not have permission to edit the wiki. Alex or someone else with privileges must need to grant us access. - Josh On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:06 PM, OK wrote: > Hi, > I notice that we should update the particular wiki articles cause ViewBase > was replaced by View with

AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

Hi Alex, as far as I understood it, It's not the patch file that we are talking about, its that the patch file (which should have an Apache license ... I think) changes an existing file with other license, hereby modifying it and creating a derivative work. Additionally it removes the original

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

Send me your wiki account ids. Wiki has different account system than the committer LDAP. Thanks, -Alex On 9/15/16, 1:47 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >Last time I tried, I also did not have permission to edit the wiki. Alex >or >someone else with privileges must need to grant us access. > >- Josh

Re: FlexJS asdoc Top Level classes

Josh, Do you have time to work on it? I think ASDoc just processes a set of source paths. It might be possible to point a source path to the .as files from flex-typedefs. -Alex On 9/15/16, 9:06 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >I was talking to someone who is using FlexJS to build an app. One thing

Re: AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

On 9/15/16, 2:30 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi Alex, > > >as far as I understood it, It's not the patch file that we are talking >about, its that the patch file (which should have an Apache license ... I >think) changes an existing file with other license, hereby modifying it >and creating a

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

My account is joshtynjala - Josh On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Send me your wiki account ids. Wiki has different account system than the > committer LDAP. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/15/16, 1:47 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: > > >Last time I tried, I also did not have perm

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Hi, > Well, I can only speak for myself, but I have learned over the years that, > while we can't say "Community over Policy" since policy is important, > community is still more important than trying to nail every last detail of > the licensing. If we start making releases that don’t conform to

Re: FlexJS asdoc Top Level classes

Using flex-typedefs is a good idea! I don't have time at the moment, but if I remember in a few weeks, I'll try to take a look. If anyone else can jump in sooner, feel free. - Josh On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Josh, > > Do you have time to work on it? I think ASDoc jus

Re: AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

Wouldn't it be easier to leave the originally license header intact, even if it may not necessarily be required, than to try to convince another community to take ownership of the code? - Josh On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 9/15/16, 2:30 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Hi, > During the release process, he brought up the fact that the full MIT license > wording was not included, I brought this up before before the release process was started [1]. The patch header issue was first brought up last in the last release many months ago. Thanks, Justin 1. https://

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Justin, any reason you did not fix the issues yourself? Were you expecting someone else to fix them? Also, why were no JIRA tickets filed? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > During the release process, he brought up the fact that the full MIT > license

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Hi, > This isn't true for many licensing issues. The answer > isn't always clear But there’s usually an option to make it just a documentation issue rather than a possible licensed error. When in doubt that should be the path we take that was it doesn’t hold up the release. > and often the me

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

OK, you should be able to edit the wiki now. Thanks for helping out, -Alex On 9/15/16, 4:07 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >My account is joshtynjala > >- Josh > >On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Send me your wiki account ids. Wiki has different account system than >>the >>

Re: AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

On 9/15/16, 4:17 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >Wouldn't it be easier to leave the originally license header intact, even >if it may not necessarily be required, than to try to convince another >community to take ownership of the code? Not sure. If we give them copyright and we shouldn't have, ca

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Hi, > Justin, any reason you did not fix the issues yourself? Were you expecting > someone else to fix them? If I had changed LICENSE/NOTICE without discussion it’s probable that my changes would be vetoed. > Also, why were no JIRA tickets filed? For these exact issue no a sI had expected it

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On 9/15/16, 4:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >> and often the message feels more like Justin is telling someone else to >>do the work instead proposing "hey, I think we >> should apply this patch to this file”. > >How much work is it (for instance) to add a header or add something to >LICENSE?

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Justin, any reason you did not fix the issues yourself? Were you > expecting > > someone else to fix them? > > If I had changed LICENSE/NOTICE without discussion it’s probable that my > changes would be vetoed. > I doubt that wou

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Some issues are more controversial than others. The controversial ones should be decided before committing changes. Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:41 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:Re: [DRAFT]

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Hi, > Some issues are more controversial than others. The controversial ones > should be decided before committing changes. So what issues do you consider not to be controversial? Which ones can I fix? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Some issues are more controversial than others. The controversial ones > should be decided before committing changes. > Fair enough. But that said, I do see Justin's point that he does not want to make the changes if there is a threat of a ve

Re: AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

I don't have an answer to your question. However, considering that there is disagreement on who should have copyright, and the original license is one that we can use, I don't see a risk in keeping their header. We can use the code either way. - Josh On Sep 15, 2016 4:40 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

Mine is okrueger Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Wiki-Replace-ViewBase-by-View-tp55169p55191.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Well, we could use JIRA as you suggested, but for starters, a list of issues in a separate email thread might be more efficient. I've lost track of what the issues are since some, like the npm distro is no longer an issue (I think). -Alex From: "omup...@gmail.com" ma

Re: AW: CreateJS Externs (was: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released)

On 9/15/16, 7:09 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >I don't have an answer to your question. However, considering that there >is >disagreement on who should have copyright, and the original license is one >that we can use, I don't see a risk in keeping their header. We can use >the >code either way. Sur

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

OK, you should have edit rights now. On 9/15/16, 9:09 PM, "OK" wrote: >Mine is okrueger > >Thanks, >Olaf > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Wiki-Replace-V >iewBase-by-View-tp55169p55191.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Development

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

Oh and thanks for contributing. I see you are making good changes already! -Alex On 9/15/16, 9:27 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >OK, you should have edit rights now. > >On 9/15/16, 9:09 PM, "OK" wrote: > >>Mine is okrueger >> >>Thanks, >>Olaf >> >> >> >>-- >>View this message in context: >>http://a

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

>Oh and thanks for contributing. I see you are making good changes already! It's fixed now, I'm always glad to help if I'm able to do it ;-) I've found that the "Hello world" example in [1] produces different results in the swf and js version. The "background-color" style (defined inside the Labe

Re: [FlexJS][Wiki] Replace ViewBase by View

On 9/15/16, 10:00 PM, "OK" wrote: > >Moreover I've found that the "Application structure" code [2] is not a >working demo which also could frustrate anybody who just copy and paste >the >code. You could replace the examples with files from DataBindingExample. I'm pretty sure that works. >Amon