Ok ... so what's the plan now? If we want to get a release out till next
Thursday, we should initiate the release process ... I guess you posted the
"Final Call" email again a few days ago so I think all should have had time to
put in what's needed now, everything else should go into the next re
On 9/1/16, 11:40 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>Took me a little while to get to this...
>
>Actually, I am really confused here. I don't have a real 'fix', but I
>understand what is causing it after chasing a few wild geese for a while.
>It seems the remove-circulars setting is the primary cause of th
On 9/2/16, 12:12 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Ok ... so what's the plan now? If we want to get a release out till next
>Thursday, we should initiate the release process ... I guess you posted
>the "Final Call" email again a few days ago so I think all should have
>had time to put in what's nee
We still need PMC members who plan to vote on this release to examine the
CI release branch artifacts and give a thumbs up. So far, I've only heard
back from Justin and still am not sure he's satisfied with changes made in
response to his early feedback.
The Ci release branch artifacts are here:
I thought I had given my thumbs up already, so I assumed you were talking
about other PMC members. +1.
- Josh
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> We still need PMC members who plan to vote on this release to examine the
> CI release branch artifacts and give a thumbs up. So far,
On 9/2/16, 8:31 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>I thought I had given my thumbs up already, so I assumed you were talking
>about other PMC members. +1.
I saw your earlier email, but it wasn't clear you had actually examined
the source artifacts the way we are "supposed to" before voting.
See the s
FYI, to complete the ApproveFlexJS.xml script successfully, I had to tell
it to download Flex SDK 4.15.0 instead of 4.14.1. When the script used
4.14.1, it tried to download SWFObject from Google Code and failed because
the link is obsolete. 4.15.0 downloads SWFObject from Github instead.
Oddly, I
Thanks! I was hoping it was something like that. I will add that now and
test.
I did look through the google closure docs for the annotations with the
various outputs, but mostly followed whatever leads were already in the
code and I did not look at the class level stuff I guess.
(I actually had
On 9/2/16, 9:25 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>FYI, to complete the ApproveFlexJS.xml script successfully, I had to tell
>it to download Flex SDK 4.15.0 instead of 4.14.1. When the script used
>4.14.1, it tried to download SWFObject from Google Code and failed because
>the link is obsolete. 4.15.0
Hi Alex,
Thanks Alex for all your help and suggestions:
With the help of my co-workers, I was able to finish Tab Component. I have
created it outside FlexJS SDK.
I would like to share the design of our current Tab component:
Note: Make sure to pass TabBarView's id as viewContainer in TabBar and
Hi Alex,
While working on this component, we found that we are not able to get
numElements from the container.
It always return us "1". I would like you to look at this.
Thanks
Dhwani
My Apache Flex community contribution is working on the open source
Moonshine-IDE.com for FlexJS.
--
View thi
GitHub user greg-dove opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/9
Fix for remove-circulars with implicit bindable implementations
This fixes adds the annotations for @extends and @implements so the
implicit implementations for Bindable remain intact after 're
GitHub user greg-dove opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/15
Js event dispatcher update
Updates to JS EventDispatcher to support IEventDispatcher implementations
more cleanly, without an earlier constructor hack.
You can merge this pull request into a Gi
On 9/2/16, 2:58 PM, "dhwanishah85" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>While working on this component, we found that we are not able to get
>numElements from the container.
>It always return us "1". I would like you to look at this.
I think that has been fixed in another branch by commit:
9e127bbf5ab90ced088
Alex, I believe the last PRs I made across falcon and asjs address the
various recent issues we discussed.
One additional (strange) thing I observed (partly because I was using a
plain text editor at one point, without xml hinting) is that you can get a
swf with invalid bytecode (stack overflow or
On 9/2/16, 2:54 PM, "dhwanishah85" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>Thanks Alex for all your help and suggestions:
>
>With the help of my co-workers, I was able to finish Tab Component. I have
>created it outside FlexJS SDK.
>I would like to share the design of our current Tab component:
Congratulations!
Hi Alex,
Thanks for compliments. I will take permission and do submit in JIRA.
Thanks
Dhwani
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-need-help-in-creating-reusable-tabBar-control-tp54492p54782.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mail
On 9/2/16, 3:26 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>Alex, I believe the last PRs I made across falcon and asjs address the
>various recent issues we discussed.
Hi Greg, thanks for sticking with it.
In looking at the change in Falcon, it appears that the patch was required
because the resolveBaseClass doe
"In looking at the change in Falcon, it appears that the patch was required
because the resolveBaseClass does not resolve to EventDispatcher. Did you
look into trying to get resolveBaseClass to resolve to EventDispatcher.
I'm wondering if there will be other issues related to that."
The change is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-falcon/pull/9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/15
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
On 9/2/16, 4:30 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>"In looking at the change in Falcon, it appears that the patch was
>required
>because the resolveBaseClass does not resolve to EventDispatcher. Did you
>look into trying to get resolveBaseClass to resolve to EventDispatcher.
>I'm wondering if there will
Yes, that was one of the major changes. I moved it alongside the other
implementation inside ClassDirectiveProcessor and was able to get more
consistent results.
I initially commented it out so I could get everything working using the
implements IEventDispatcher approach - which is the more general
On 9/2/16, 5:10 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>Yes, that was one of the major changes. I moved it alongside the other
>implementation inside ClassDirectiveProcessor and was able to get more
>consistent results.
>I initially commented it out so I could get everything working using the
>implements IEven
Sound great. Yes, switching it back on at any point should remain a quick
fix option because it would simply make the other code act as a backstop.
I will take a quick look on Monday to see if I can find any problems in
small as-only projects where maybe the order of class definitions in the
swf co
26 matches
Mail list logo
