Maybe this is the better solution [1], adopted from here [2].
Olaf
[1] Using "emphasized" style attribute:
http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
minWidth="955
thank you reuger, its all working now!
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:19 PM, OK wrote:
> Maybe this is the better solution [1], adopted from here [2].
>
> Olaf
>
>
> [1] Using "emphasized" style attribute:
>
>
> http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
>xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe
I’m not complaining about the output. I think the work you guys have done with
the compiler is superb. :-)
However, I do think we should strive to get the output as minified as possible
and there’s probably some strategies which we can employ to get the output more
compact.
I’m not totally cle
I was waiting until I got my app to run before I responded to this, so my
response would be more intelligent.
On Jul 19, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> FWIW, Google doesn't call it a limitation. They think they are enforcing
> good design principles. We could generate different code
I removed this, and now I’m getting an circular error of: XMLList -> XML ->
XMLList
That’s going to be hard to remove… :-(
On Jul 20, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I tried removing the -remove-circulars option, and the only error I was was a
> circular dependency of: SEVERE: ERROR - Circul
I have no idea how to even go about removing that dependency.
XMLList has a list of XML, so it needs to know about XML.
XML needs to build XMLLists of it’s children.
Even creating a factory doesn’t seem to me like it would solve this problem
because XML needs to know about the factory and the f
Also:
The signatures of XML functions have XMLList and XMLList has signatures with
XML.
On Jul 20, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I have no idea how to even go about removing that dependency.
>
> XMLList has a list of XML, so it needs to know about XML.
>
> XML needs to build XMLLists of i
Well I found improvements in 3 of the examples, still not all of them are
bug-free but at least now two more modules have no JS issues that I could find.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2016 07:57:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org; Christofer Dutz
B
Which ones are having issues? I touched DataBindingExample and
ChartExample; I think Alex touched FlexJSStore - are those the ones that
improved in your opinion?
‹peter
On 7/20/16, 10:06 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well I found improvements in 3 of the examples, still not all of them are
>bu
Github user pkovac commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/pull/8
It might be even better to turn the (mxmlc|asjsc|asjscompc)npm scripts
into Node scripts; The availability of 'sh' is not a guarantee on Windows.
https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/9420
Hi Alex,
here you have the info:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Preparing+FDKs+for+Maven+builds
for example:
Download Flex 4.14.1, Flash 17.0, Air 17.0 (for Windows and Mac) as well as
the Fontkit
java -jar apache-flex-sdk-converter-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -flexVersion 4.14.1
-flas
Fun stuff, huh?
I think the (short-term) answer is to have the build merge XML.js and
XMLList.js into a single file. We might need to have the compiler special
case the dependency calculation as well.
-Alex
On 7/20/16, 6:46 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Also:
>
>The signatures of XML functions have XML
Is anyone having issues with FB 4.7 running under Mac OS El Capitan? I'm in a
situation where it starts, has its logo-square up and the doc shows a progress
bar over the icon. Then it suddenly flashes the workspace window and dies.
I've had this happen before and often after a couple of tries it
You can run grep to see the TODO.
~/git/flex/release/flex-asjs/examples$ grep -r -10 --include=pom.xml
'TODO' *
Peter, did you check the CreateJSExample? That might be a good place to
look.
-Alex
On 7/20/16, 8:12 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>Which ones are having issues? I touched DataBindingE
I’ve had FB freeze on me.
One thing that worked was:
1. remove the org.eclipse.core.resources folder
2. start FB
3. close FB
4. replace the newly created folder with the old one.
On Jul 20, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Is anyone having issues with FB 4.7 running under Mac OS El Capitan
A single file should work.
I’m not getting any errors when using the -remove-circulars argument and the
XML processing seems to be working very well so far.
On Jul 20, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Fun stuff, huh?
>
> I think the (short-term) answer is to have the build merge XML.js a
Thanks. That kinda-sorta-worked. I think it has something to do with
org.eclipse.core.resources/.safetable directory. Maybe a file is locked or
something. I'll make a note of this. I got FB running by my projects are
all gone from the navigator. Shouldn't be big deal.
Again, thanks for the suggest
I'm trying to do that - just got FB sorted. At first I was thinking that
CreateJS was really just about CreateJS and there shouldn't be a SWF
version, but as I got back into it, I realized that it should work - at
least be fairly close. So it has something to do with the effects in the
SWF side, wh
Did you put the old folder back? That should bring back your projects.
On Jul 20, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Thanks. That kinda-sorta-worked. I think it has something to do with
> org.eclipse.core.resources/.safetable directory. Maybe a file is locked or
> something. I'll make a note o
I did. They were gone. :-(
On 7/20/16, 2:17 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Did you put the old folder back? That should bring back your projects.
>
>On Jul 20, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>
>> Thanks. That kinda-sorta-worked. I think it has something to do with
>> org.eclipse.core.resources/.safeta
So much code, so much to remember! The Sequence effect in the CreateJS
package only has COMPILE::JS code; there is no SWF code! I will try to get
it to use the Flash Sequence code.
On 7/20/16, 2:12 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>I'm trying to do that - just got FB sorted. At first I was thinking that
>
I Added comments with my findings in the pom.xml files.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Peter Ent
Datum: 20.07.16 17:12 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Falcon][Fl
Can someone please let me know how long the compiler.jx.tests normally take
to run. I am getting timeouts, this is probably related to the speed of my
dev machine I'm guessing. If I bump test.timeout to 60 (10 mins) they
complete in around 8 mins.
This happens to me on develop branch builds. I
They run in a few minutes on my Mac. I've found that on occasion memory
gets low or maybe some other variable changes and the tests slow way down
because a new VM is launched for every test and that seems to take a long
time.
HTH,
-Alex
On 7/20/16, 1:26 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
>Can someone plea
Thanks Alex.
It actually runs about 25% faster when I set fork="no" on the junit task
which seems odd to me.
This is on windows 10. The whole 'ant all' build from flex-asjs used to
take around 8-9 mins, and now takes 17 mins.
I must have inadvertently changed something in my setup somewhere to cau
It fails on Copy FalconJX SDK files
Here's the install log:
Installer version 3.2.0 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache FlexJS Nightly
AIR version 21.0
Flash Player version 21.0
Creating Apache FlexJS home
Creating temporary directory
without fork the build doesn't have to create a new vm for every test. This is
a huge performance improvement. You could also give the Maven build a try ...
This seems to be a lot faster :-)
I'm currently working on a how-to doc on that.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
The forkMode is perBatch not perTest so that 'sounds like' (I am unsure!)
that shouldn't have such a big impact.
I had thought this was definitely much faster previously so I think
something might have changed on my side. I do see an additional Java
process being started, but it sits at 0% cpu, so
28 matches
Mail list logo
