Hi Justin,
when doing my tests with an empty local maven repo I did encounter this message
you were talking about. It's log output of the mavenizer. I remember having
problems of the mavenizer kicking in, but I had no Idea what dependency
actually triggered it getting active, so I added some i
Hi,
In order to start releasing falcon cleanly I did some pre-release checks and
did a little cleaning up. I removed my Patch mojo from the
compiler-build-tools, as we now use normal patches instead of the regexp stuff.
I also noticed that I put shared test-code in there too. I moved that out
On 7/9/16, 3:57 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>In order to start releasing falcon cleanly I did some pre-release checks
>and did a little cleaning up. I removed my Patch mojo from the
>compiler-build-tools, as we now use normal patches instead of the regexp
>stuff. I also noticed that I
On 7/8/16, 2:04 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>ok in order to prepare the stage for a 0.7.0 release of Falcon and ASJS,
>I would like to propose some final moving around of things. I would like
>to move the "externs" to the ASJS project. For me the ASJS project is
>sort of a synonym for
Hi Alex,
Well fire me they are sumthing in between falcon and asjs. My main reason for
wanting to move them us that it would completely untangle the dependencies and
make the build trivial.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von:
Getting a flex-extern repo is also an option.
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Christofer Dutz
Date: Sat, Jul 9, 2016 7:54 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:AW: [FlexJS][Falcon] Some final moving around of stuff :-)
Hi Alex,
Well fire me they a
I was going to suggest this option.
Externs are something which might or might not be used with the Framework.
Having it a separate repo makes it clear that it’s a third piece of “FlexJS”
(i.e. FlexJS Compiler, FlexJS Framework and FlexJS Type Definitions). In fact,
I would vote to name the rep
This works nicely when all projects are open in FlashBuilder, but I try and
have as few open as possible for performance and simplicity. So it looks
like I'll be going back to my original flow. Still, it's good to know that
options exists.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-dev
On 7/9/16, 10:30 PM, "yishayw" wrote:
>This works nicely when all projects are open in FlashBuilder, but I try
>and
>have as few open as possible for performance and simplicity. So it looks
>like I'll be going back to my original flow. Still, it's good to know that
>options exists.
What happens
