GitHub user matrix3d opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/5
sortOn
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/matrix3d/flex-asjs develop
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/5/
pls
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-donation-the-sorton-code-tp52565p52863.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
must ded the type.
if(Array){
for(var i=0;ihttp://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-foreach-very-slow-tp52571p52864.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Github user matrix3d commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/pull/5#issuecomment-217622378
float number
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
On 5/5/16, 2:48 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying a simple Hello World in IntelliJ I did at the time of the 0.6
>release (with the Josh tutorial in NExtGestAS3), now with 0.7 nigthly
>(through Flex SdK installer), and getting the same error as Ju
On 5/7/16, 1:32 AM, "lizhi" wrote:
>must ded the type.
>if(Array){
> for(var i=0;i}else{
> for in
>}
Should be doable. How much faster is it?
Please file a pull request or JIRA so we don't forget this issue.
Thanks,
-Alex
Ok ... in a final struggle to at least have something to show at my talk at
ApacheCon I dug really deep into the compiler and noticed one thing:
There's a class called: JSSharedData, which contains a set of public static
variables for containing the state of a compilation (I guess). The problem
Right. I read that. This was what I was referring to in my last email.
However, the Addition Operator is supposed to call [[Append]] and [[Append]] is
supposed to assign the right side target object and target property to the left
side object. So why doesn’t the original XML get effected?
On Ma
Judging by the comments in the file, Mike meant to get rid of this class.
I'm guessing it was added as a temporary hack to get things up and running
as quickly as possible, which was a very important thing earlier in the
life of FalconJX. Sometimes, things that we know are
"super-duper-ultra-bad" a
If you do make this change it should be an optional compiler argument,
because this changes the behavior of the code. The following loop should
print 1 and 2, not undefined:
var array = [];
array[2] = 1;
array[4] = 2;
for each (var x in array)
trace(x);
On May 7, 2016 10:18 AM, "Alex Harui"
I agree with Andy. The default behavior should remain syntax sugar on top
of for-in.
- Josh
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Andy Dufilie
wrote:
> If you do make this change it should be an optional compiler argument,
> because this changes the behavior of the code. The following loop should
>
I agree that the initial version doesn't have to be perfect. But we have to
keep track of such places and make sure to clean them up as soon as we have
some time. Perhaps it would be a good idea if implementing something we know is
hacky, to create an Issue for cleaning up?
It's just that trac
This was marked as TODO, so it was “being tracked” on some level. There are
currently 43 TODOs in codegen/js and 101 TODOs under compiler jx main total.
Those sound like a good place to start… ;-)
On May 7, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> I agree that the initial version doesn't
Hi Chris,
I just tried build falcon with maven. As I understand from you comments
inside main pom I have to run
mvn clean install -P utils and later compiler profile ?
Utils profile build for me without the problem, but compiler failed. Am I
doing something wrong ? It should work at least for F
It should be:
1. set the FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER environment variable
2. mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install -P utils
3. mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install -P compiler
4. mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install -P externs
the settings-template.xml makes Maven also check the Apache
Thank you Chris!!! <3
It took me one hour to setup everything and successfully built Falcon! :)
I hope you won't give up and will manage to resolve problems with FlexJS.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.23
Hi piotr,
Why that long? Were there any other problems? Everything more than 15 minutes
needs optimizing :-)
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: piotrz
Datum: 07.05.16 14:29 (GMT-08:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW:
Haha I think cause my internet connection plus I had to refresh a bit my
knowledge about maven. :) So it could take 15 minutes. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-Maven-Build-so
10x slow.
maybe use the arr.forEach.
pls run this code
https://gist.github.com/matrix3d/a9765b94ade3d626ad64d16f28deccae
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-foreach-very-slow-tp52571p52880.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development maili
The array forEach() seems like an acceptable alternative. Looking at MDN
[1], forEach is widely supported in browsers. Including IE 9.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/forEach
- Josh
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM, lizhi wrote:
> 10x slow.
On 5/7/16, 12:01 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>I agree that the initial version doesn't have to be perfect. But we have
>to keep track of such places and make sure to clean them up as soon as we
>have some time. Perhaps it would be a good idea if implementing something
>we know is hacky, to c
On 5/7/16, 11:36 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Right. I read that. This was what I was referring to in my last email.
>
>However, the Addition Operator is supposed to call [[Append]] and
>[[Append]] is supposed to assign the right side target object and target
>property to the left side object. So why do
22 matches
Mail list logo
