Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

HI, > No word from designmodo yet. I've pushed changes to make the fonts an > optional dependency. That is also a valid way around the issue, but means more work for the user. [1] > I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating > another RC. Perhaps give people a litt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, Sorry -1 binding due to possible license issues and unable to compile from source. Willing to change vote to +1 if these are sorted. I checked: - Signatures and hashes good - Source NOTICE is OK - Source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below) - Binary NOTICE is OK - Binary LICENSE same mi

Heat maps for falcon and asjs

Hi, A little off topic but may be of interest. I did some hotspot analysis on Falcon / FlexJS for a talk I’m giving and you can find the drafts here: http://cssw.info.s3.amazonaws.com/Apache/hotspots/flex-falcon/index.html

AW: [FLEXUNIT] Building

Seems like a good candidate to Mavenize FlexUnit next ;-) Chris Von: Peter Ent Gesendet: Montag, 28. März 2016 20:07 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FLEXUNIT] Building Yes. If you do clean your flexunit project, be sure to manually but hamcrest SWC

Some help with the ASJS build

Hi, I am currently working on extending my flex-maven-plugin I started for compiling falcon to also build ASJS. For this I am investigating the output of the Ant build. Now it seems as if some targets are run multiple times: If I take one project for example: "DragDrop" and search through the

AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

Replying to the last message, before the thread was hijacked ;-) I don't quite get what you mean with the validation-suites ... but I guess the definition of downstream is what I'm having a problem with: - ASJS is compiled using Falcon, let's call ASJS downstream from Falcon. - Falcon needs ASJS

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

On 3/29/16, 6:18 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Replying to the last message, before the thread was hijacked ;-) > >I don't quite get what you mean with the validation-suites ... Perhaps the term "compatibility suite" would be better? I know that before Flash ships a release, there is a bunch

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

Yes they do test against other stuff, but the released versions of them ... In all of your examples are run against released versions. If for example we would test against the last released version, this would be fine, but we are testing one unreleased version against another unreleased version

Re: Some help with the ASJS build

On 3/29/16, 2:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > >If I take one project for example: "DragDrop" and search through the log >output, I can see that first "compile" is run. After that "compile-asjs" >is run. The strange thing is, that after this "compile" is run again ... >why? Are you building t

Re: AW: [FLEXUNIT] Building

On 3/29/16, 2:38 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Seems like a good candidate to Mavenize FlexUnit next ;-) Sounds fine to me. I took a quick look on search.maven.org and didn't see hamcrest-as3 but maybe I didn't do the search correctly. The key problem for us is that the place we used to pick

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

On 3/29/16, 12:20 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >>I need to do more testing of the install script changes before creating >> another RC. > >Perhaps give people a little more time to look at the FlexJS RC as it may >save another RC if an issue is found? I’ll post my vote s it contains a >few other

Re: AW: [FLEXUNIT] Building

It looks like the URL has changed: https://github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/hamcrest-as3-flex-1.1.3.zip It's worth noting that Github "downloads" are considered deprecated, so this URL may change again in the future, or it might even disappear. It's possible to upload binaries for "re

Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

On 3/29/16, 8:09 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Yes they do test against other stuff, but the released versions of them >... In all of your examples are run against released versions. If for >example we would test against the last released version, this would be >fine, but we are testing one un

AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

We could use SNAPSHOT versions of the SDK ... yes ... these could be built with the nightly build Job. When thinking about Maven you really have to stop thinking about "downloading nightly builds" and stuff like that. Maven has it's dependency resolution mechanism for that. But if we would be

AW: AW: [FLEXUNIT] Building

We could build hamcrest-as and have it deployed to Maven-Central ... It seems to have not been updated for 5 or 6 years. https://github.com/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3 I could contact the guy owning that repo for permission to deploy the binary to the Sonatype OSS repo (Like I have done for JBurg fo

Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

On 3/29/16, 8:36 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >We could use SNAPSHOT versions of the SDK ... yes ... these could be >built with the nightly build Job. Yay, sounds like we have reached agreement on a plan? >But if we would be building everything on the ASF Jenkins, we could >auto-publish the S

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, > Regarding the LICENSE in the ASDoc package: Did you see other content in > there that needs mentioning in LICENSE or is the ALv2 sufficient. Nothing I could see, just a straight boiler plate Apache 2.0 LICENSE is required I think. BYW having extra info in LICENSE while incorrect is a lic

flexjs build box2d,get error

-- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-build-box2d-get-error-tp52037.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

Canceling because of the font licenses. The next RC will try to make them an option in the installer (and not bundled in the packages). Hold on to your hat! -Alex On 3/29/16, 12:22 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry -1 binding due to possible license issues and unable to compile >from s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/falcon/0.6.0/rc1/apache-flex-fa lconjx-0.6.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y README_JX is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES_JX is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC2

This is the discussion thread. Changes in this RC include: -The contents of frameworks/fonts are no longer packaged as they may not have Apache-compatible licenses -LICENSE was changed to not mention the contents of frameworks/fonts -The build script will ask you whether you want those files or no

[VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC2

Hi, This is vote for the 0.6.0 release of Apache FlexJS. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.6.0/rc2/ Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.h

Re: flexjs build box2d,get error

What’s the error? Harbs On Mar 30, 2016, at 5:35 AM, lizhi wrote: > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/flexjs-build-box2d-get-error-tp52037.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.