package
{
/**
* ...
* @author lizhi
*/
public class A
{
public var b:B
public function A()
{
}
private function test():void {
is it the bug will be fixed?or not fiexd it forever?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-Circular-dependency-detected-A-B-A-tp51298p51299.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if it will be fixed some day,i will wait it.
or it can not be fiexd forever,i will changed my *.as now to deal with the
bug.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-Circular-dependency-detected-A-B-A-tp51298p51300.html
Sent from the Apache Fl
i just think ,the A class not need B ,when not call the test function test().
i just think the google lib not the best.the flexjs need replace the google
lib,use other lib.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-Circular-dependency-detected-A
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-Circular-dependency-detected-A-B-A-tp51298p51302.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
In the latest version, FalconJX does not remove circular dependencies by
default. You must specify -remove-circulars when running the build command.
On Jan 16, 2016 04:55, "lizhi" wrote:
> package
> {
> /**
> * ...
> * @author lizhi
> */
> public class A
thanks.but how code ant?
this code?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-Circular-dependency-detected-A-B-A-tp51298p51304.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/16/16, 3:14 AM, "lizhi" wrote:
>thanks.but how code ant?
>
> fork="true">
>
>
>
>this code?
Yes, assuming you are using the nightly builds.
The problem is this: Because each .as file becomes its own .js file, the
output needs to load each .js fi
I made the change I suggested below and updated the fxp file at [1]. See
if it makes things better for you. I think there is always the
probability that at the moment the editor tries to save the file that the
watcher will have the file locked to check its modification date, but that
shouldn't lo
If you do we can do some runtime live rendering without using a compiler.
I'm doing that now for MXML using only metadata and doing it live for HTML
markup.
For MXML import there are two passes, one is to check for valid XML and if
not valid return any errors, then if it is valid, we pass it to th
I'm not sure I understood all of that, and it sounds interesting, but I'm
not clear how you can "assemble" the code that glues the UI together at
runtime without a compiler. For example, if I want to click on something
to change from state A to state B, that is usually done in ActionScript.
-Alex
I'm talking about a live preview that's created from the MXML markup. It
doesn't pay attention to any of the AS. The components are created on the
fly from the XML. There would be no interaction.
With your live coding example, you start coding and when you save you
create a new swf. That swf is wa
On 1/16/16, 10:55 PM, "jude" wrote:
>I'm talking about a live preview that's created from the MXML markup. It
>doesn't pay attention to any of the AS. The components are created on the
>fly from the XML. There would be no interaction.
>
>With your live coding example, you start coding and when
13 matches
Mail list logo
