+1
Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
-Mark
+1
r/s
-Mark Kessler
Senior Program Analyst
MCICOM G4
Phone: (571) 256-7089
Email: mark.kessler@usmc.mil
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 12:46 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Adopting Swiz
Hi,
As I mentioned i
On 12/4/15, 5:05 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>+1
>
>Would we store it under something like "org.apache.flex.utils"?
>
I'd either leave it as is: org.as3commons
Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons
Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons
Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons
Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have to
reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Ado
+1 for renaming it. make it part of the main package. that way we have to
commit to it. if we put it off to the side there's more "it's a side
project. we don't need to maintain it."
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote:
> Good point, we should ke
IIRC most of the projects have some pretty thorough unit tests as well.
Mike
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:14 PM, jude wrote:
> +1 for renaming it. make it part of the main package. that way we have to
> commit to it. if we put it off to the side there's more "it's a side
> project. we don't need to
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #119 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/119/.
