What are the blockers to getting both our Jenkins back on line ?
I think Alex is hoping a free Microsoft VM will arrive for his one,
that's apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net right ?
What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ?
Could we get the accounts shared around more people so we're not reliant
on
>
> What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ?
>
I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
I’m about to give up on waiting and pull out my credit card. No idea why I’m
not getting any attention from the free MSDN program.
The PMC has the credentials to log into Erik’s VM and reboot from within the VM
and same for my VM. Getting others access from the Azure manager might require
giv
Just an idea ... how about running Windows VMs on a real (In the sense of not
virtual) server (no matter what OS)? We could setup Jenkins to fire up a VM,
start the Mustella suite on that VM as soon as it's up and discard it as soon
as it's done?
There is a Vagrant Plugin for Jenkins that is ab
On 24/09/15 13:45, Erik de Bruin wrote:
I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it.
Cheers Erik !
Tom
On 24/09/15 14:55, Christofer Dutz wrote:
We could setup Jenkins to fire up a VM, start the Mustella suite on that VM as
soon as it's up and discard it as soon as it's done?
That would be a very good idea.
Some questions:
* how would you get the results in and out of the VM
* how could you te
Alex, I am willing to contribute my share of the costs. Also, I have a spare
server that I would be willing to setup as a backup or mirror for the
Jenkins builds.
I was thinking about another way to get money, if there is not enough people
willing to contribute cash. I think there is a products we
What kind of machine do we need for Jenkins? Would an AWS instance work and if
yes what size machine would we need? Is there a reason to use Azure over AWS?
On Sep 24, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I’m about to give up on waiting and pull out my credit card. No idea why I’m
> not gett
The only reason to use Azure is because I had one set up already, although
they have said they will delete it soon.
My VM is only running builds and not mustella, so I am going to try the
cheapest Azure option and see how it goes. If it is enough for the builds
then I can handle the cost.
-Alex
OK. I have a bunch of AWS instances. The cheap linux instances are less than
$10 per month.
If we create a new account, we’d even get a cheap instance free for a year.
I can create a new account for Flex. If we do need to upgrade the instance,
that’s pretty seamless.
On Sep 24, 2015, at 6:11 P
Well, this is turning out to be trickier than I thought. I’m not a
language person, but one difficulty in getting this to work in our
compiler seems to have to do with a key difference between AS and JS.
As Josh mentioned in the links below, in JS identifierNames can be used
essentially anywhere
If you are volunteering to take over the builds, that would be great. I
don’t know how much time you have to fiddle with this. I may just renew
my Azure with the cheapest option and see if it will work with 1 core and
we don’t lose the setup. Then you’ll have an idea of what we might cost
if we
Also: I’m a member of Bizspark which entitles me to some free Azure services:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/member-offers/bizspark-startups/
I have no idea how to set that up though…
On Sep 24, 2015, at 6:52 PM, Harbs wrote:
> OK. I have a bunch of AWS instances. The cheap linux in
Time is the key… ;-) I have very little of that, and I don’t know the first
thing about setting up Jenkins.
But, I’d be happy to give anyone on the PMC access to the servers so folks can
help with the fiddling.
On Sep 24, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> If you are volunteering to take o
Requiring "this." before a reserved word when it's used as the name of a
member seems perfectly reasonable. It's sort of the same thing as when a
function parameter is named the same as a member variable.
function(param:String):void
{
this.param = param;
}
Sometimes, certain naming conflicts
Yes, I agree with you there. I’ll definitely take a look at it, thanks for
pointing it out.
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Lou wrote:
>
> Well I haven't used it yet so I don't know if I *recommend* it (yet),
> but here's why I'm focusing on trying it first:
>
> -They're Flash and Flex focused
OK, well that made things “easier”. I’ve pushed changes with a few tests
into the JsToAs branch. Volunteers are welcome to add more tests for the
other keywords
Now the question is: Do we gamble and merge these changes into the
develop branch for the upcoming release?
-Alex
On 9/24/15, 9:15 A
I think with FlexJS still in an evolving state, this doesn't seem like a
huge risk. We're not pushing these changes into the older compiler, which
has a larger audience with more legacy code. Regardless, since the reserved
words were not allowed by the compiler in the past, it seems like there is
a
Theres' an Agent running on the VM ... jenkins connects to that the usual way.
Think there are deffinitely options for debugging ... haven't used that approch
thoug, but I'm working with someone who's an expert in things like that :-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tom Chiverton [
Hi,
Does this look familiar to anyone? I'm using java 7 on windows 10.
compile:
[javac] Compiling 1786 source files to
C:\dev\flexjs\flex-falcon\compiler\ge
nerated\classes
[javac]
C:\dev\flexjs\flex-falcon\compiler\generated\src\org\apache\flex\com
piler\internal\parsing\as\RawASDocToken
Run the ‘ant clean’ and try again. If that doesn’t work, open
RawASDocTokenizer and look at the first line to see if was generated by
Jflex 1.6.0. My copy only has “default” in it 3 times and not at line 719.
HTH,
-Alex
On 9/24/15, 3:16 PM, "yishayw" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does this look familiar to
Good catch. I replaced the JFlex version to 1.6 (from the installer build)
and it works. The latest, which 1.6.1, will yield the aforementioned message
and fails.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Compiling-Falcon-tp49343p49345.html
Sent from
Reading about problems like this, I would really like to at least do the
dependency resolution using the Ivy Ant resolver. This way the version
nightmare and version checking should be taken care of by the system ... what
do you think?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yishayw [mail
OK, the latest changes to handle global classes and keywords as function
names have been merged and I’ve seen it build and run the FlexJS examples,
so it is finally time to get a release out.
The source and binary packages are here:
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/nightly/falcon/
PMC members
Hi,
Looks like FlexJSStore is back in working order after some last-minute
layout refactoring. I think it is now time to get a release out.
The source and binary packages are here:
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/nightly/flexjs/
PMC members are supposed to at least examine the source packa
On 9/24/15, 11:49 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Reading about problems like this, I would really like to at least do the
>dependency resolution using the Ivy Ant resolver. This way the version
>nightmare and version checking should be taken care of by the system ...
>what do you think?
I have n
Would be cool if the release version would too be staged in the maven repo ...
Want me to take care of that?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2015 08:51
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Release Apache F
Same as with Falcon ... want me to stage the artifacts for release in the maven
repo?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2015 08:50
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
Hi,
Looks
On 9/24/15, 11:53 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Would be cool if the release version would too be staged in the maven
>repo ...
>Want me to take care of that?
Well, we don’t have an official release yet, but you are more than
welcome to stage snapshots any time you want and put up the maven
Of course we can ... but we did have a lot of trouble ... all sorts of related
to dependencies ... wrong versions, offline repos, ... I'm just suggesting to
let this stuff be handled automatically.
Isn't development about getting better and not claiming to "stay with the old
stuff"?
Ivy is An
30 matches
Mail list logo
