Hi,
another thing I just stumbled upon ist hat Falcon probably needs the ASDoc
templates from the SDK. Am I correct with this? I am currently trying to bundle
everything up that you can use falcon by adding a dependency to the falcon
compiler artifact or the old one by referencing that. Now I w
Hi guys,
sorry for all the flexmojos & maven spam recently, but I'm trying to get some
things finished ;-|
Usually we had all the compiler artifacts deployed with the group-id
"org.apache.flex:compiler" and all oft he artifacts it needed were in
"org.apache.flex.compiler:xxx" (The root artifac
The 2 solution seems more logical to me, can you see a drawback ?
> Another thing I will probalby change in the mavenizer is not to
generate a pom-typed compiler artifact, but to have the jar containing
the compiler become the root and I add all the dependencies tot hat.
Do you mean its pom.xml
No ... not exactly.
Currently the org.apache.flex:compiler artifact is of type "pom" and hereby
doesn't have any library behind it. All it does is to transitively pull in all
the jars in the lib dir of the FDK. In Falcon there is actually only one jar
containing the entire compiler so I created
Hi,
I started to check if it was possible to have private and protected constructor
in Falcon and I have to admit it was tricky especially because I never seen a
compiler from inside before but it is apparently possible, I've been able to
compile successfully:
package myLib {
public class CTORT
On Oct 4, 2014 12:55 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I started to check if it was possible to have private and protected
constructor in Falcon and I have to admit it was tricky especially because
I never seen a compiler from inside before but it is apparently possible,
I've been able to c
In general the ActionScript Virtual Machine enforces access modifiers (so that,
for example, something marked private is truly inaccessible by any means
outside the class) but I don't think the AVM enforces non-public constructors.
I'm guessing that a constructor in the ABC is public regardless
On 10/4/14, 8:59 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>another thing I just stumbled upon ist hat Falcon probably needs the
>ASDoc templates from the SDK. Am I correct with this?
I¹m not sure what you mean by templates. I don¹t know the ASDoc compiler
that well. I do think I discovered that Fa
@Om, Didn't mentioned it because I guess the implementation for "new" and the
relative checks are almost the same than for the extends and now I understand
better FP, even though I mentioned method overloading implementation, actually,
I guess it could be even done without but would be cleaner w
@Om, sorry, I misreading but yes, singleton means also some static methods and
I tried it having some trouble with but don't think it will be for a long time.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Falcon] Constructor NS (was: [Falcon] starting
Gorgon, sorry as well, I didn't mean FB but FP, I use to write faster than I
think :P
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Falcon] Constructor NS (was: [Falcon] starting up)
> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 06:31:26 +0100
>
> @Om, sorry, I misreading
11 matches
Mail list logo
