Hi,
> Agreed. Any argument to put copyright attribution anywhere is essentially
> claiming it to be an uncommon situation, especially since it isn't called
> out in [1].
Well actually it is, AL is a permissive license. It no different to MIT or BSD
in that regard, the only difference being is
I'm going to ask on legal-discuss. I've commented in-line as well.
IMO, nothing you quoted here contradicts this passage which is from the
legal folder:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
"If the media comes from a third-party source (not contributed directly to
the project), then any c
Hi
> But just so I understand: is your position now that the LICENSE and NOTICE
> are ok as-is?
No as I've said several time we need to acknowledge Google's copyright in a
clear way - hiding it a binary file doesn't make it clear where it is from
for any one looking at the code.
If something goe
Hi Om,
I'm keep receiving this error in the rc3 release of the Flex SDK Installer
when downloading Flex 4.13.0 + AIR 14 + FP 14:
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-flex-sdk-4.13.0-bin.tar.gz
Verif
So what do you propose and what quotes support it?
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi
> But just so I understand: is your position now that the LICENSE and NOTICE
> are ok as-is?
No as I've said several time we need to acknowledge Google's copyri
On Jun 21, 2014 9:38 AM, "DarkStone" wrote:
>
> Hi Om,
>
> I'm keep receiving this error in the rc3 release of the Flex SDK Installer
> when downloading Flex 4.13.0 + AIR 14 + FP 14:
>
> Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
>
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk-release/lastSuccessfu
