On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/13 4:43 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Sep 18, 2013 10:15 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/18/13 10:09 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Adding it as a source path instead, has an added adv
Is it possible to simplify advanced layout constraints? Would it be
possible to add support where all you needed was the id and the value and
you wouldn't have to declare the rows or columns.
So, for example, the following would be valid:
Maybe if a layout row or column is not defined check i
Hi,
PS Google in it's infinite wisdom though that build failed messages were spam,
otherwise I would of fixed it sooner.
Justin
Yeah, when you see the "MyInitialView1_c()" or "MyInitialView1_i()" then
you know FB built it last. Is this FB 4.6 or 4.7? If you turn off "build
automatically" will it stop overwriting the FlexJS version?
-Alex
On 9/19/13 12:16 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:54 P
On 9/19/13 12:37 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>PS Google in it's infinite wisdom though that build failed messages were
>spam, otherwise I would of fixed it sooner.
OK. But how did "ant main checkintests" not catch this before you checked
in?
-Alex
Hi,
Seem way too many emails from it - or is google just sending me all the ones
I've missed out on?
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
I am looking into this.
--peter
On 9/19/13 1:03 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I haven't tried StatesTest in a while. Can you work with DataBindingTest
>instead? It should have everything StatesTest has and more.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/18/13 9:58 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>>I picked this project
Looks like the build machine is acting up again.
On 9/19/13 7:30 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Seem way too many emails from it - or is google just sending me all the
>ones I've missed out on?
>
>Justin
I'm not making any headway on this. There is a global style declaration
which should associate a state implementation with any class:
global
{
iStatesImpl: ClassReference("org.apache.flex.core.SimpleStatesImpl");
}
I don't know why this isn't being picked up. I'm going to try
DataBindingTest
On 9/19/13 12:29 AM, "flexcapaci...@gmail.com"
wrote:
>Is it possible to simplify advanced layout constraints? Would it be
>possible to add support where all you needed was the id and the value and
>you wouldn't have to declare the rows or columns.
>
>So, for example, the following would be val
I'll let you do the digging, but make sure the capitalization is right,
and that it is using the same ValuesImpl as DataBindingTest.
On 9/19/13 9:02 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
>I'm not making any headway on this. There is a global style declaration
>which should associate a state implementation with
Darrell,
Have you (or anybody) seen a spec for how a Vector ends up in the
Multiname pool?
Thanks,
-Alex
As far as I can tell, this is what is happening:
"states" is a property of ViewBase and the property is being set very
quickly upon application load. The states setter function is assuming
there is a valuesImpl loaded into the ValuesManager, but that's not the
case because the Application's initHa
I don't know of a spec besides the AVM2 spec. I'd also look at the swfdumps
of code generated by falcon and mxmlc.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Darrell,
>
> Have you (or anybody) seen a spec for how a Vector ends up in the
> Multiname pool?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
I stepped through my working copy of DataBindingTest.
The initHandler in Application.as gets called first, and sets up the
ValueManager. Then, the MyInitialView gets addedToParent, which fires off
the MXMLDataIntepreter which assigns the states.
Which made me look at the call stack and again, th
Checkout ABCEmitter.java in falcon if you haven't already.
If you are seeing an issue with the old compiler's SWFDump, then I believe
that was a bug in SWFDump not in falcon's generated code.
-Darrell
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darrell Loverin
wrote:
> I don't know of a spec besides th
The VM is the ultimate judge of what is correct. If it runs correctly, then
the problem is with SWFDump.
-Darrell
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm using the new compiler's SWFDump. I thought about using MXMLC's
> SWFDump, but it doesn't handle LZMA so I'd have to switc
I'm using the new compiler's SWFDump. I thought about using MXMLC's
SWFDump, but it doesn't handle LZMA so I'd have to switch to uncompressed.
When I run this SWF, I get a Verify Error about ABC corruption. When I
first tried SWFDump, it blew up on Vector.> in trying to
resolve the "Forward refer
Hi,
> OK. But how did "ant main checkintests" not catch this before you checked
> in?
I did an ant in the frameworks project but was in the wrong SDK (I have too
many SDKs lying about), it was late and I didn't think a change of a single
method to public would break the SDK so badly. My mistake
HI,
> Your under the assumption he sleeps. He's really a machine :)
I just power down every night :-)
Justin
HI,
> One thing you may want to do is suggest is for the RM to ask the PMC if
> their VOTEs may be "carried through", especially in the case of some minor
> update to a new RC that doesn't involve a critical bug fix
+1 to that, several RCs have just been README/RELEASE_NOTE or similar low risk
ch
HI,
Near the top of addSortField we have:
if (headerInfo && headerInfo.internalLabelFunction != null &&
column.sortCompareFunction == null)
return;
Shouldn't that be column.sortCompareFunction != null? ie if you have a custom
sort function don't bother adding a new oridinary sort field
Hi,
I took a quick look at the Locale code and the Resource Manager code and as far
as I can see Flex already supports language only locales (see comments in
Locale.as).
So possibly all that is requires to fully support an language locale is to:
1. add it as an ultimate fall back (as required)
23 matches
Mail list logo
