Justin,
Can you please do the honors for the Mac and Linux builds? I have the
source kits and windows binaries up in the dev dist site under rc3. Once
this is done, I will go ahead and start the vote for Installer RC3.
Thanks,
Om
I'm with Erik here too, fix it in develop + branch both issues.
On 30 July 2013 07:57, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Same here:
>
> Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
> "eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722"
>
> ???
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul
OK, my bad on the folder name. Updated the readme.
Anybody know what permission I would have to change to allow the jar to be
downloaded?
On 7/29/13 11:57 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Same here:
>
>Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
>"eclipse/plugins/com.adobe
Eric could you try to clean the workspace cache[1] or eventually try a new
workspace?
I can't confirm if it would solve the problem because I'm moved to IntelliJ.
[1] {workspace}/.metadata/.plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel
On 30 July 2013 07:57, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Same here:
>
> Pe
When using interfaces for type checking, there are two 'kinds': at
compilation and at runtime.
The @interface and @implements annotations are for compile time checking.
For runtime checking comes in two flavours: 'instanceof' and 'is'.
Our method of setting up inheritance (goog.inherits) maintai
Hi,
Looks like something broken on the linux build:
ApacheFlex-app.xml: error 305: Intial window content SWF version 14 exceeds
namespace version http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/2.6
Justin
OK, I think I've fixed the permissions. Let me know if you have a problem
using it.
-Alex
On 7/30/13 12:23 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>OK, my bad on the folder name. Updated the readme.
>
>Anybody know what permission I would have to change to allow the jar to be
>downloaded?
>
>
>On 7/29/13 11:
The file downloads fine.
The new jar does the trick, I get a nice, clean new project, no errors.
Thanks!
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I think I've fixed the permissions. Let me know if you have a problem
> using it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/30/13 12:23 AM, "Alex H
Hi,
Managed to sort (wrong default AIR version in framework air-config.xml we may
need to fix that for Linux) but will be a few hours before I can upload the
binaries.
Justin
It works great.
Project compiles without errors
mac osx 10.8.4
I'll will try FB 4.6 on my win7 later
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 30 jul. 2013, om 08:57 heeft Erik de Bruin het volgende
geschreven:
> Same here:
>
> Permission error on the download and the
Hi,
just let you know that I made a pull request to starling framework to
upgrade to flexmojos 6.0.1 and Apache Flex
for building starling maven artifact.
https://github.com/PrimaryFeather/Starling-Framework/pull/372
still if anyone knowns something about the "Adobe" text info in the swf tag
I w
Hi,
Done aded Linux and Mac installer binaries to RC3.
Enjoy!
Justin
Hi,
Run into an issue today with a RTE in 4.10 that I didn't get in 4.9.1, it
happen with mx:Datagrid inside a ViewStack but I've been unable to work out a
simple test that generates the RTE.
The RTE is easy to fix and I've submitted a patch in develop/release that fixes
it. If anyone else has
Hi,
just let you know that my pull request was accepted and now Apache Flex
4.9.1 and Flexmojos 6.0.1 is the base of the starling framework maven build
:)
Carlos
2013/7/30 Carlos Rovira
> Hi,
>
> just let you know that I made a pull request to starling framework to
> upgrade to flexmojos 6.0
In theory you shouldn't have to add code like that. In the debugger at the
exception check parents height. The top most one is getting bad height but
could be from bad measure in children.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Run into an issu
On 7/30/13 6:27 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>just let you know that my pull request was accepted and now Apache Flex
>4.9.1 and Flexmojos 6.0.1 is the base of the starling framework maven
>build
Congratulations!
>>still if anyone knowns something about the "Adobe" text info in the swf
>>
On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs
Are we sure changing an externally visible string wont break any third
party tools ?
Maybe ones that are trying to spot Flex Applications by looking for it,
for instance ?
Is this a go
I use FB 4.6 and I actually have to modify the flex-sdk-description file to
say 4.6.0 because when it detects newer versions of Flex, it will forceably
say that the version of flex is not compatible with design view. Still
trying to get an eye out for an IDE that supports a design view so I can
mo
On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
>> Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs
>Are we sure changing an externally visible string wont break any third
>party tools ?
>Maybe ones that are trying to spot Flex Application
On 7/29/13 11:48 PM, "Paul Hastings" wrote:
>
>just in case you don't already know, this issue shows up in FB4.6 & SDK
>4.10.0
>as well.
Yes, I'm aware, but it is a bundle of work to try to fix up 4.6 and I'm
not sure how well that will go over with Adobe management since only 4.7
"officially
On 7/30/13 1:48 AM, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
>It works great.
>Project compiles without errors
>
>mac osx 10.8.4
>
>I'll will try FB 4.6 on my win7 later
I'm pretty sure it won't work there. Unfortunately the class I changed
was refactored between 4.6 and 4.7.
-Alex
Your right :)
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 30 jul. 2013, om 19:15 heeft Alex Harui het volgende
geschreven:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 1:48 AM, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
>
>> It works great.
>> Project compiles without errors
>>
>> mac osx 10.8.4
>>
>> I'll will
On 7/30/2013 10:17 PM, Chris Martin wrote:
I use FB 4.6 and I actually have to modify the flex-sdk-description file to
say 4.6.0 because when it detects newer versions of Flex, it will forceably
say that the version of flex is not compatible with design view. Still
trying to get an eye out for a
"eclipse becomes violently drunk"
Yes, that is an actual technical term :-)
On 7/31/2013 12:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
"eclipse becomes violently drunk"
Yes, that is an actual technical term :-)
yeah when eclipse starts belting out this tune, its time to shut it down ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUeKDtMV1gA
Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6 to be
released.
*Issues addressed in RC3*
1. Updated README to include:
a. Mention about sdk-installer-config-3.0.xml and the new location
b. Note about changing Adobe AIR namespace version from 3.4 to 2.6 on Linux
2. Updated sdk-ins
Can you give us odds on how likely that "if ever" is? If it's likely
that Adobe will release this as a fix, I'd be willing to release the
SDK in expectation of that event. If not, I'll keep pushing for a
solution we can create and distribute ourselves.
Thanks,
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:14
Paul,
Design View is no longer supported for anything that we (Apache) produce.
Flash Builder 4.6 and below tied the specific SDK version with a special
module within the IDE that was used to render the DV. We don't have the
ability to patch FB4.6 (esp. since FB 4.7 replaced it, and no longer
su
On 7/30/13 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Can you give us odds on how likely that "if ever" is? If it's likely
>that Adobe will release this as a fix, I'd be willing to release the
>SDK in expectation of that event. If not, I'll keep pushing for a
>solution we can create and distribute ourse
I don't think 4.6 is all that important. If we fix 4.7, the latest
versions of the SDK and Flash Builder are good to go. Everyone else
needs to update or live with the workaround.
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
>>Can
Thanks for digging into this issue and finding a solution.
My thoughts/concerns on this:
- It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with Apache
Flex in any case.
- Will the fix for FB 4.7 work with
Please post all discussions about Installer RC3 in this thread.
Thanks,
Om
On 7/30/13 12:09 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Thanks for digging into this issue and finding a solution.
>My thoughts/concerns on this:
>
> - It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
>Apache
Thanks Alex, I just see your change :)
2013/7/30 Alex Harui
>
>
> On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>
> >On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs
> >Are we sure changing an externally visible string wont break any
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>
> >On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs
> >Are we sure changing an externally visible string wont break any third
> >
Crap, this got stuck in my mailbox.
On 7/29/13 2:27 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/29/13 11:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>Did you look into having the installer pick up the language based on the
>> current locale se
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Crap, this got stuck in my mailbox.
>
> On 7/29/13 2:27 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/29/13 11:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >>Did you look into ha
Hit this link: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/LocaleTest/LocaleTest.swf
For me on Mac OSX 10.6.8, I can change the System Preferences/Language to
something else and only the last value (Capabilities.language) changes.
Source is below:
http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
xmlns:s="li
Hi,
> I don't think 4.6 is all that important. If we fix 4.7, the latest
> versions of the SDK and Flash Builder are good to go.
Good we have a solution for 4.7 but given that this is really a perception
issue (the actual problem has a very simple workaround ie edit and fix the
generated code)
Hi,
Also even with that patch to FB we would still have to change the RC version
number form 4.10.0 to something else right for it to work in a patched version
of FB? It sill using major*100+minor*10 to compare versions right?
Justin
On 7/30/13 4:23 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Also even with that patch to FB we would still have to change the RC
>version number form 4.10.0 to something else right for it to work in a
>patched version of FB? It sill using major*100+minor*10 to compare
>versions right?
It is still using
Hi,
> It is still using bad code, but the change allows 4.10 to work.
So 4*100+10*10 + 0 == 500 is going to be treated the same as 5.0.0 (5*100 + 0 +
0 = 500), 4.10.1 (say we need to patch it) = 501 which will end up with a
higher version than than 5.0.0. 100% sure this is just not going to caus
Paul,
I changed version to 4.6.0 in the ..\sdks\4.9.1\flex-sdk-description.xml
file and design view works just fine. But I don't bank on it all the
time. Eventually, like Nick, i'll have to re-train my brain and stop using
Design view. Really a bummer they stopped working on that, it's great fo
On 7/30/13 4:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It is still using bad code, but the change allows 4.10 to work.
>So 4*100+10*10 + 0 == 500 is going to be treated the same as 5.0.0 (5*100
>+ 0 + 0 = 500), 4.10.1 (say we need to patch it) = 501 which will end up
>with a higher version than t
Hi
Finally FlexUnit jenkins job is up and running.
Job details and results can be found here ->
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-flexunit/
Cyrill
bump...
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6 to be
> released.
>
> *Issues addressed in RC3*
> 1. Updated README to include:
>
> a. Mention about sdk-installer-config-3.0.xml and the new location
> b. Note abo
Getting to it, just woke up ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:56 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> bump...
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.6 to be
>> released.
>>
>> *Issues addressed in RC3*
>> 1
Great work Cyrill!
Are you planning on doing a release or will that be some time in the future?
EdB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Finally FlexUnit jenkins job is up and running.
>
> Job details and results can be found here ->
> https://builds.apache.org/job/fl
On 7/30/13 3:12 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>>
>> >On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
>> >> Crap, modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/ProductInfo.java needs
>> >Are we sure
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 3:12 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/30/13 8:11 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 30/07/2013 16:05, Alex Harui wrote:
> >> >> Crap, modul
On 7/30/13 11:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>Any chance this could break third party tools like automation, etc?
You never know what assumption folks are making about SWF metadata. But
I'm not sure we really have a choice legally.
-Alex
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 11:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> >
> >Any chance this could break third party tools like automation, etc?
> You never know what assumption folks are making about SWF metadata. But
> I'm not sure we really have a choice
On 7/30/13 11:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/13 11:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>> >
>> >Any chance this could break third party tools like automation, etc?
>> You never know what assumption folks are making a
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 11:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/30/13 11:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Any chance this could break third party tools
54 matches
Mail list logo
