> It will be a lot of work to integrate the compilers into FB.
Can you give me a basic idea of what is involved?
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Hi,
I has an attempt to update the release notes and would like some help - see the
TODOs in the checks
Note that the changes in develop (and the release notes) need to go all the way
back to December as 4.9.1 was a minor modification of the 4.9 branch and
changes in develop were not merged in
Hi,
Just a note I generated the bug list like so:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12323982
It does include bugs marked as duplicated, marked wont fix and improvements as
well but it everything that's been resolved since that date. It may also have a
couple of 4.9.1 issues in there
I'll go the long way round ;-)
EdB
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
> show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of "ant release"?
> Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the "release" target migh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650587#comment-13650587
]
William Draï commented on FLEX-26325:
-
Excellent, thanks.
> RemoteOb
Hi,
And it also include falcon and other issue that probably shouldn't be there -
as far as I can see there no way to automatically generate this list you have
to do it by hand :-(
Justin
Justin Mclean created FLEX-33541:
Summary: Update Apache Flex release notes for the next release
Key: FLEX-33541
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33541
Project: Apache Flex
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650615#comment-13650615
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33541:
--
Made a start and checked into develop.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-33541:
-
Affects Version/s: Apache Flex 4.9.0
> Update Apache Flex release notes for the next release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-20956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-20956.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Checked into develop branch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-27652.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Checked into develop branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-14153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-14153.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
fixed and checked into development b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-13423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-13423:
-
Labels: easyfix easytest (was: )
> DateChooser selectedRanges gives selectedRange start+1 da
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-21790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-21790.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Resolved in previous version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-20804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-20804:
-
Labels: easytest (was: )
> Datefield change please remove the the DateChooser control close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-22865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-22865.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Fixed and checked into develop branc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-27768.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed and checked into develop branch
> DateField formatStri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-32971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Kessler closed FLEX-32971.
---
> Datagrid selectedIndex property is not working sometimes
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Kessler closed FLEX-33495.
---
> Flex FileReference.browse() opens a save dialog in Firefox - NOT an open
> dialog
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Kessler closed FLEX-33498.
---
> Enhancement for dataProvier/selectedIndex supporting components
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-27468:
-
Labels: easytest (was: )
> The TextArea's bounds are reported as starting at local coordinat
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>
> Thanks for your continued efforts to make this happen. If you want a
> guarantee that there won't be rejection, then the project should have a
> vote, but before that, I think we need to the point where folks can try
> RIATest on FlexJS/FalconJX.
> I have FlexJSTest, FlexJSTest_again, FlexJSTest_createjs, FlexJSTest_HTML5,
> StockQuote and VanillaSDK_POC in the examples dir. Are these all reasonable
> targets for testing?
All but "VanillaSDK_POC"; I've suspended development on that project
to give FlexJS a chance to mature. No need for tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-28657:
-
Labels: easytest (was: )
> mx:TabNavigator text truncation stopped working in 22797
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-16334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-16334:
-
Labels: easytest (was: )
> VBox: maxVerticalScrollPosition == 0 if VBox has scrollbar and he
I forgot to restart FB once I replaced the FlexJSUI.swc in the
FlexJSOverlay SDK area. That fixed the problem. Now both Test_CreateJS and
Test_HTML5 work - I didn't need to do anything to the code.
Peter Ent
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
On 5/6/13 11:40 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 5/6
I'm trying to programmatically create a RadioButton to test and create a jQuery
version. My ActionScript code works well:
public function createNewRadioButton() : void
{
var rb:RadioButton = new RadioButton();
rb.initModel();
rb.initSkin();
rb.text = "New Radio";
rb.groupName = "group1";
On 5/7/13 3:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> I have FlexJSTest, FlexJSTest_again, FlexJSTest_createjs, FlexJSTest_HTML5,
>> StockQuote and VanillaSDK_POC in the examples dir. Are these all reasonable
>> targets for testing?
>
> All but "VanillaSDK_POC"; I've suspended development on that proj
Does your RadioButton have a method called initModel? The base classes
don't implement it by default.
On 5/7/13 7:38 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> I'm trying to programmatically create a RadioButton to test and create a
> jQuery version. My ActionScript code works well:
>
>
> public function crea
Anyone know something about this interface ([1] on github)?
Its asdoc states "the IFocusManagerComplexComponent interface defines the
interface that components that can have more than one internal focus target
should implement in order to receive focus from the FocusManager" - so I
tried to implem
Edward Trochim created FLEX-33542:
-
Summary: mx:AdvancedDataGrid header column separators display
embedded SWF on mouseover
Key: FLEX-33542
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542
Projec
On 5/7/13 12:50 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> It will be a lot of work to integrate the compilers into FB.
>
> Can you give me a basic idea of what is involved?
>
Not 100% sure, but here's what I think I know:
1) In theory, FB 4.7 should call the SDK's mxmlc when building.
2) However, FB do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650987#comment-13650987
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33542:
--
Can you provide a sample code showing this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13650987#comment-13650987
]
Justin Mclean edited comment on FLEX-33542 at 5/7/13 3:57 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edward Trochim updated FLEX-33542:
--
Attachment: AdvDataGridBugTest.zip
> mx:AdvancedDataGrid header column separators display e
Hi,
> 2) However, FB doesn't like new flags being added to that SDK's mxmlc.
It's actually OK with that eg the advanced telemetry stuff I added a few weeks
ago works fine with FB.
> F) I don't believe there are any new releases of FB planned at this time
Probably assumed but perhaps not public
That interface is, in fact, only for the initial assignment of focus to the
component that wraps multiple targets. That wrapping component must then
manage tab focus on its own by handling the keyFocusChange event and calling
preventDefault on it when it wants to keep focus on one of the wrapped
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651009#comment-13651009
]
Edward Trochim commented on FLEX-33542:
---
I attached the Flex Builder project I creat
Thanks Alex.
In my test I was never preventing it, but the tab focus movement to the
next component was not worked (I expected to always move forward, at
least): for some reason, the internal focus target was not part of the
FocusManager tab loop candidates. I saw that, in this case, the
FocusMana
See [1] for the method I was talking about...
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/managers/FocusManager.as#L1336
2013/5/7 Cosma Colanicchia
> Thanks Alex.
>
> In my test I was never preventing it, but the tab focus movement to the
> next component
The FocusManager doesn't want to know about internal focus targets, it
really only wants to know about the "component". For example, in
mx:TextInput, the internal focus target (stage.focus) is a TextField, but
from the developer's and FocusManager's perspective, the focus is on the
wrapping TextIn
As a matter of fact, it does. Well, its super-class does.
org.apache.flex.jquery.staticControls.RadioButton extends
org.apache.flex.html.staticControls.RadioButton which has initModel. I'll
try adding it to the jQuery version and have it call the super method.
-peter
On 5/7/13 11:26 AM, "Alex Ha
Might be you need to fully qualify RadioButton
On 5/7/13 10:01 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> As a matter of fact, it does. Well, its super-class does.
>
> org.apache.flex.jquery.staticControls.RadioButton extends
> org.apache.flex.html.staticControls.RadioButton which has initModel. I'll
> try addi
Okay, is it time for us to test this proposal by implementing a couple of
whiteboard repos? Anyone committer wants to volunteer?
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> OK.
>>
>> Just wondering, if a committ
Yes, I ended up removing the "implements IFocusManagerComplexComponent" and
playing with focusEnabled and hasFocusableChildren properties in the
external and in internal components instead to obtain the intended
behaviour.
Thank for your help - maybe we could add some more detail in
the IFocusMana
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651414#comment-13651414
]
Jeff Spicer commented on FLEX-33521:
Apologies. I'm having difficulty reproducing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Kessler reassigned FLEX-33537:
---
Assignee: Mark Kessler
> Spark TextArea writing in prompt text format
> -
HI,
Something has gone badly wrong here, not 100% sure but think you may of merged
the wrong way and undid a lot of changes?
Justin
On 08/05/2013, at 8:19 AM, gordonsm...@apache.org wrote:
> Merge branch 'develop' of https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk
> into develop
>
>
> Pro
I get the impression he pulled the updates from origin then merged his
changes which kept his timeline when he last pulled. So it's showing
everybody's commits merged into his develop since then?
-Mark
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> Something has gone badly wrong
Hi,
> I get the impression he pulled the updates from origin then merged his
> changes which kept his timeline when he last pulled.
Which wouldn't produce this result I believe.
> So it's showing everybody's commits merged into his develop since then?
Makes it very hard to see what has actually
I think it's OK.
Try: git diff 6462a0f 0a6b468
This shows the diff with the last of three of Gordon's "Merge branch 'develop'
of https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk into develop" commits with
the previous commit made by Erik with the message "Added missing license
headers". It's e
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I get the impression he pulled the updates from origin then merged his
> > changes which kept his timeline when he last pulled.
> Which wouldn't produce this result I believe.
>
> > So it's showing everybody's commits merged into hi
>
>
> This confusion could be avoided by doing a git pull --rebase on the
> develop branch before pushing new commits to develop.
>
> --Dasa
>
>
I agree. We seem to be getting tripped up with this kind of merge commits.
git pull --rebase seems like a very attractive option at this point.
HI,
> This is expected with pull+merge. Justin, why do you think something went
> badly wrong?
Because a commit was made that has 100's of lines changed that should not of
occurred.
Justin
I think we're back to arguing about how to use Git "properly". If merge commits
are forbidden in flex-sdk, then I'll try to avoid causing them in the future.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 5:33 PM
To: dev@fle
However, I see some merge commits that Justin has done. So maybe they're not
forbidden?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 5:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [2/7] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - Merge branch
'develop' of
> I agree. We seem to be getting tripped up with this kind of merge commits.
I don't agree. Merge commits are a normal feature of Git and should not cause
any confusion. They can simply be ignored. There's even an option for ignoring
them: git log --no-merges.
- Gordon
-Original Message--
Hi,
> However, I see some merge commits that Justin has done.
Yep guilty as charged - just noticed this one as it merged a lot of changes.
Although some of them don't seen to be reapplying the changes like your which
is odd.
Justin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Kessler resolved FLEX-33537.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex Next
There were events still processing / set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651529#comment-13651529
]
Mark Kessler commented on FLEX-33537:
-
Ran Mustella components/TextInput and TextArea.
On May 7, 2013 6:03 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
> However, I see some merge commits that Justin has done. So maybe they're
not forbidden?
>
> - Gordon
I don't think we came to a consensus about this. There has been a lot of
discussion about this in the past and I have no interest in starting it
Hi,
> Merge commits are a normal feature of Git and should not cause any confusion.
> They can simply be ignored.
There there any case where they would show other changes? ie In the case of a
conflict?
If they can be safely ignored can we not have them mailed to the SVN/Git change
list?
Than
Hi,
> However, I suggest that if no one has objections, we all use the rebase
> option for a while and see if we can live with that.
It's currently impossible to use rebase if you make a release or run a single
mustella test (as you'll have unstaged changes).
Justin
On May 7, 2013 6:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > However, I suggest that if no one has objections, we all use the rebase
> > option for a while and see if we can live with that.
>
> It's currently impossible to use rebase if you make a release or run a
single mustella test (as you'll h
Hi,
> It is okay to have exceptions. We can't have a solve for every scenario.
Well in a normal check in for the Flex SDK you should of at least run the
mustella check in tests, so I think the exception is going to be for every
check in.
Normal development process for fixing bugs etc should i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651561#comment-13651561
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33542:
--
Confirmed - doesn't happen in Adobe Flex 4.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edward Trochim updated FLEX-33542:
--
Description: The mx:AdvancedDataGrid control in Flex 4.9.1 is acting very
oddly when the applic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651565#comment-13651565
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33542:
--
Also happens with mx:Datagrid.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651568#comment-13651568
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33542:
--
And also spark data grid - so more likely an
It's ok for me, I want try
-Message d'origine-
From: OmPrakash Muppirala
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 7:15 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Github based Whiteboard proposal
Okay, is it time for us to test this proposal by implementing a couple of
whiteboard repos? Anyo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651579#comment-13651579
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-33542:
--
And also with s:Image (inside or outside a de
On May 7, 2013 7:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> It's ok for me, I want try
Awesome! Can you please send me your github id?
Thanks,
Om
>
> -Message d'origine- From: OmPrakash Muppirala
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 7:15 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Github b
Hi,
A rather odd bug reported.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542
If you mouse over the header separator the resize cursor is corrupt and
contains loaded asset Image (with SWFLoader, mx:Image or s:Image). This happens
every time and effects s:DataGrid, mx:DataGrid and mx:AdvancedD
Sure, it is doublefx like in https://github.com/doublefx but I'm pretty sure
I'll have to add another email address somewhere, my committer alias is
based on my hotmail account, my github one on my gmail account, from what I
read before, I should be able to add my apache one somewhere, right ? I
I suspect the FXG assets have different mouseEnabled or mouseChildren
behavior than the SWF assets Adobe used in Flex 4.6. We were forced to
switch to FXG assets in Apache so we could have source for them.
If you don't want to keep digging, just assign it to me and I'll take a
look.
On 5/7/13 8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean reassigned FLEX-33542:
Assignee: Alex Harui
> mx:AdvancedDataGrid header column separators display embedded SW
Hi,
> I suspect the FXG assets have different mouseEnabled or mouseChildren
> behavior than the SWF assets Adobe used in Flex 4.6.
Ah that would make sense.
Oddly the mx divided boxes don't have the issue so it may not be quite that
simple.
> If you don't want to keep digging, just assign it t
I'm hoping to spend more time in flex-sdk later this week. We have to get
mustella to not disturb your git status so I will figure out how to ignore
enough stuff to make that possible, or add an ant target that cleans out
mustella if there isn't already one.
Regarding merge vs rebase, it is my cu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-23834.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Checked into develop branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-23464.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Fixed in previous version or in Apch
80 matches
Mail list logo
