Utilizing the linkage-reports is one thing that's particularly easy to
configure when building using Flexmojos :-)
I wrote up all sorts of size-reduction options with Flex and Flexmojos in my
wiki: https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Optimizing+your+build
The biggest optimization I co
Well you can still use RSLs if your user base will frequent your site multiple
times in a day.
-Original Message-
From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:54 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: RSLs and signing
Okay. Like you said this sucks.
I
Links reports help a lot. It reduces modules down noticeably. However you
have a harder time doing incremental compiling. There are a few instances
where it doesn't compile the latest code properly.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Sunday, February
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Om wrote:
> I was thinking about this. I wanted to have a hidden html component in the
> Installer that would call a special page which simply calls the js function
> on load. This page would be called only from the Installer
IMO, if that happens users sh
Well Apache RSL's (signed or unsigned) will be tossed in your regular browser
cache. The Adobe signed ones are stored in a separate repository for the swz
files n such. My Win7 path is located...
C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Flash Player\AssetCache\[random
letters]\
This is pers
Hi,
> This is persistent storage up to about 20MB or so. Whereas the ones from
> pretty much anyone else will get lost as soon as I clear my web browser cache.
Which most users never never do. Unless the users of your application are
developers :-)
Justin
Agreed.
That's why I've been trying to get anonymous statistics -- ones that can't
be tied back to an individual (like Google), but without the ability to
write anything to disk locally, we are pretty much stuck. All I really
want is a download count, and could really care less about the rest (we
I can see '\' characters in myTextArea.text. Should I try replacing them
with '\n' or that won't help?
As I said, that TA doesn't display new lines. Any TA properties can help?
TIA,
Oleg
On Feb 8, 2013 1:15 PM, "Oleg Konovalov" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am working on old Flex3 (Cairngorm2) app.
>
>
Okay. Here's a thought:
What about using HTML local storage to store Apache RSLs that can be loaded as
needed? Can anyone think of a workable way to do that? It won't work for all
browsers, but it'll offer gains for the browsers that do, and it can have a
fallback for the ones that don't.
Harb
On 2/11/13 3:58 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This is persistent storage up to about 20MB or so. Whereas the ones from
>> pretty much anyone else will get lost as soon as I clear my web browser
>> cache.
>
> Which most users never never do. Unless the users of your application are
On 2/11/13 3:08 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
> Well you can still use RSLs if your user base will frequent your site multiple
> times in a day.
>
True, but if you don't use RSLs, you'll be storing less in their browser
cache.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs
Are there \r or \n in the strings? Try using getCharAt() to examine the
string. If there are, then somehow, the multiline flag got turned off on
the internal text widget.
On 2/11/13 6:51 AM, "Oleg Konovalov" wrote:
> I can see '\' characters in myTextArea.text. Should I try replacing them
>
Interesting idea. I know that for google chrome you
could definitely leverage the user's chrome account.
Sounds like a fun side project for Chrome enthusiasts.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Okay. Here's a thought:
>
On 2/11/13 4:40 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> That's why I've been trying to get anonymous statistics -- ones that can't
> be tied back to an individual (like Google), but without the ability to
> write anything to disk locally, we are pretty much stuck. All I really
> want
On 2/11/13 3:32 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
> Okay. Here's a thought:
>
> What about using HTML local storage to store Apache RSLs that can be loaded as
> needed? Can anyone think of a workable way to do that? It won't work for all
> browsers, but it'll offer gains for the browsers that do, and it can
Yes, and it also hits the mirror CGI script that we have setup. One of the
options we talked about was just parsing the web server logs for those
files -- the problem is we would have to grab ~6GB worth of logs a day in
order to parse just for those files... And the processing time along with
it.
I'm not really sure how it would/could work. But here's what I'm thinking:
My idea would be to somehow invoke something from the Apache domain which would
store the data. The local stores are domain specific so I don't think you can
directly access Apache's store from a different domain. If ther
How are we tracking the other stuff? Something about running JS? What does
that JS do that the CGI script or a redirect can't do?
On 2/11/13 8:34 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Yes, and it also hits the mirror CGI script that we have setup. One of the
> options we talked about was just
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> How are we tracking the other stuff? Something about running JS? What
> does
> that JS do that the CGI script or a redirect can't do?
>
>
Write to google analytics. The ga js scripts do that for us.
>
> On 2/11/13 8:34 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatk
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Om wrote:
> > I was thinking about this. I wanted to have a hidden html component in
> the
> > Installer that would call a special page which simply calls the js
> function
> > on load. This pa
We are tracking via Google Analytics for the rest of the website. It
covers any page that is under the new template. Unfortunately, we can't
include JavaScript in the CGI scripts that determine the site mirror to
track downloads, nor can we use JavaScript to track the XML file used by
the SDK ins
One more. I want to introduce annotations/attributes depending on if you speak
Java or C#.
Basically, real classes backing things like metadata as opposed to just fancy
strings we can parse.
Mike
Probably not. I like the idea of having shared libraries, but all the
information would have to be able to run/validate from your main server. Being
signed from Apache with would a be a completely different issue.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Harbs [mailto:gavha...@gmail.com]
Sen
Intel doing that stuff now? Just don't know what to say...
It looks like attempt to parse Apple Store to the open web, but Intel?
On 08/02/2013 14:13, Igor Costa wrote:
Gordon, Michael,Alex and anyone here in list we should see how the Intel is
converting ios apps to html5 format.
http://softw
24 matches
Mail list logo
