Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So is everyone doing it the import projects way, then? I don't. I import the whole SDK as a general project (under new project) and just use ant to compile. Justin

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Alex Harui
It makes me think it isn’t finding airglobal.swc. It could be the one you have is corrupted. HTH, -Alex On 12/4/14, 12:24 PM, "Mihai Chira" wrote: >Ok, I'm giving up for today. > >I managed to get makeApacheFlexForIDE.bat running after I commented >out the copying task. But now that the AIR sd

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Mihai Chira
Ok, I'm giving up for today. I managed to get makeApacheFlexForIDE.bat running after I commented out the copying task. But now that the AIR sdk seems to be all right too, I still get the same error when compiling with IntelliJ. So is everyone doing it the import projects way, then? On 4 December

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Mihai Chira
Update: after commenting out the PackageMXP target, the "ant -Dbuild.number=20141204 -Dbuild.noprompt=release" command worked, but the compilation fails with the same error: "The definition of base class Error was not found." Alex, after that I also did an "ant main", which was successful, but now

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Harbs
FWIW, The way I work, is by adding textLayout as a library project to FB. I take care to never actually build it in FB. I always build it using ant. I’ve found without adding lextLayout to Flash Builder, I cannot use the features like jumping to code, and the like. I then add the binary in the

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Alex Harui
Mihai, I don’t think you need to run the “release” target. The “main” target should be sufficient. And thus you shouldn’t need the MXP tools and can probably take them out of your environment variables. -Alex On 12/4/14, 11:23 AM, "Mihai Chira" wrote: >Update: running ant -Dbuild.number=20

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Mihai Chira
Update: running ant -Dbuild.number=20141204 -Dbuild.noprompt=release failed at the PackageMXP target in frameworks\projects\flash-integration\build.xml:159 with this as the only information: ___ FlashMXP: [echo] ADOBE_EXTENSION_MANAGER is c:\Program Files (

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Almost all the projects there have the .actionScriptProperties and .flexLibProperties. So, just importing it as an existing project into FB will ensure that the correct config files and compiler directives are added. Thanks, Om On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Om,

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> > Om, I think I tried that a while ago and got into a lot of trouble > because those projects in the 'frameworks/projects' folder had so many > dependencies and custom compilation flags, etc. I'm glad you could get > it to run, but I'd like to make the current source a working SDK for > the IDE.

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Mihai Chira
Thanks for the promptitude guys. Alex, I am working from the repos indeed. Erik, thanks for the pointer. I'm just running ant -Dbuild.number=20141204 -Dbuild.noprompt=release, and then following the next steps; let's see if that helps. Om, I think I tried that a while ago and got into a lot of t

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
The best way I know of is to point FB to a version of the SDK created by the Flex Installer. Then, add flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\ as Flex library projects in the same workspace. Then, in your test application, add the library projects as a 'Project dependency'. This way, you can continue

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Alex Harui
Mihai, are you working from a source release artifact or from the repos? While it is informative if you are having trouble following the instructions to work from a source release, since you are a committer, it would be best if you are working from the repos as then you can just check in a fix. -A

Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Erik de Bruin
Not really, I'm afraid. I did just rewrite the README to make the process feel a bit more logical and structured. Have you looked at that? Or is that what's causing your troubles? In which case I'd be interested to know which steps led to the issues you see, and how you solved them. Thanks, EdB

Using source version as current Flex SDK

2014-12-04 Thread Mihai Chira
I want to make sure that I bug I raised in tlf is reproducible in the nightly source. I've never tried making the source sdk the current sdk before, and it's proving much more difficult than I thought. Here's what I did: >ant release (in main sdk folder) after finally figuring out that I need a cf