On 11/16/15, 1:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>2. The Problem with a dual approach of ANT and Maven is that Maven uses
>convention over configuration, this means that it is possible to setup a
>maven build for the current project structure, but it's quite a
>configuration effort. If however w
Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 1:45 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Those @#*$^ Environment Variables
On 11/16/15, 9:36 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>Well for one of my dev machines, we've removed all the source, build
>file
On 11/16/15, 9:36 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>Well for one of my dev machines, we've removed all the source, build
>files, property files, samples, and templates out of the folders.
>Multiple SDK's stored in a shared parent folder. The sdk folders are
>labeled things like "Flex 4.14.1
the RSLs and also affect our shared modules in use.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:14 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Those @#*$^ Environment Variables
On 11/16/15, 5:23 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
w
On 11/16/15, 5:23 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>
>One my ideas for improvement would be to change the way we do binary
>packages. The strip out everything from the binary package except the
>bare bones of what is required. So just keep it the libraries, asdocs,
>licenses, notices and su
I use the environmental variables. Especially when I synch sdk/air/global
files between development machines. My main work development machine is on a
private network. Each of my machines are setup with different paths and have
slightly different environments. Using scripts to setup t
Hi,
> 5. You don't "have to" take a course to use Maven ... I bet 99% of the Maven
> users have never taken a course, it's just an offer from my side to help
> others get up to speed.
That’s 100% correct I’ve made binding votes on lots (50+?) of releases just
knowing the basics. i.e. “mvn comp
Not sure if it’s useful yet, but apparently Windows 10 has “OneGet” which is
supposed to fill the same need. There’s currently Chocolatey as well. I’m not
sure how either one measures up. Some more reading:[3]
[1]https://github.com/oneget/oneget
[2]https://chocolatey.org/
[3]http://www.hanselman
uot; take a course to use Maven ... I bet 99% of the Maven
users have never taken a course, it's just an offer from my side to help others
get up to speed.
Chris
Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Novem
Ah okay. PC guy here :-)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Harbs wrote:
> “brew” is the command for Homebrew which is a Mac package manager similar
> to apt-get on Linux. The other popular one is MacPorts. I have both
> installed, but I tend to use Homebrew.
>
> Here’s some interesting reading o
“brew” is the command for Homebrew which is a Mac package manager similar to
apt-get on Linux. The other popular one is MacPorts. I have both installed, but
I tend to use Homebrew.
Here’s some interesting reading on them.[1]
Homebrew has had recipes for every package I’ve needed.
[1]http://app
Hi,
> Do you see any conflicts with ASF policy if our Maven scripts bring down
> Adobe artifacts?
No issues there I believe. If they not bundled then we’re not distributing them
so there's no issue. It’s more to do with Adobe policy rather than Apache.
> Apparently, I don’t have brew installed.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Instead of replying individually to all of these posts, let me see if I
> can summarize my thoughts here:
>
> For sure, we should try Maven. I think the main questions, since there’s
> been so much emphasis lately on making it easier for new
Instead of replying individually to all of these posts, let me see if I
can summarize my thoughts here:
For sure, we should try Maven. I think the main questions, since there’s
been so much emphasis lately on making it easier for new contributors to
contribute are:
1) I think it will take weeks
Hi,
> I could ask my boss, if I could give such a course ... probably as a remote
> course (But If you're somewhere near Frankfurt, we could eventually have some
> offline-attendants).
Timezones permitting I’ll be up for that.
Justin
Hi,
> Similarly, we could have Maven binaries packaged with the src and binary
> releases. This eliminates the need for sdk devs and end users to have
> maven installed.
We could add that to the binary release but not the source release, you can’t
have jars in a source release.
Previous vers
ve some offline-attendants).
>
> Probably instead of having 2-2 full days, we could do a set of 4-6
> evenings (in europe) or mornings (in the us)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 15.
13:46
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Those @#*$^ Environment Variables
I think I'm in the "let's try Maven" camp as well.
I think it's safe to say that ant is not a clear good fit. Yes. It works, but a
lot of us have had trouble with it.
Like Om, I don't see
I think I’m in the “let’s try Maven” camp as well.
I think it’s safe to say that ant is not a clear good fit. Yes. It works, but a
lot of us have had trouble with it.
Like Om, I don’t see a difference between requiring ant and requiring maven.
The one time I did try Maven to build something, it
want without requiring us to setup
all sorts of "Those @#*$^ Environment Variables" (Especially on CI environments)
Yeah ... I know ... that's a lot of work, but hey ... you want to stick to Ant
... Maven automates a lot of the stuff you want to ensure. I guess noone ever
check
After reading your email, I am more convinced that Maven is the way to go.
Sure we can use any other tool or build our own, but I don't see why.
Maven seems to be a very good fit. There is a common misconception that
Maven is just a build tool. It is in fact a project management tool + a
build t
Hi,
Folks are still getting tripped up trying to get prerequisite build tools
set up and ready to go. Let’s use this thread to figure out a better
solution. I know Chris is going to say “Maven” and I support that, but I
still think we can’t require everyone to go to Maven.
Some history: There
22 matches
Mail list logo
