I interested in donating.
2013/3/5 Harbs
> Alternately, Alexey, would you be interested in donating your
> implementation?
>
>
encies
> >> in my app. It's horribly painful... :-(
> > I assume you are using -link-report and some viewer like ItDepends?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think you have to pick so
nful... :-(
> I assume you are using -link-report and some viewer like ItDepends?
>
>
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>> I think you have to pick some goals. What is the main purpose of a Spark
>>> Tree? Is it just to allow for Sp
> I've been spending a LOT of time (like tens of hours) minimizing dependencies
> in my app. It's horribly painful... :-(
I assume you are using -link-report and some viewer like ItDepends?
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I think you have to pick so
a LOT of time (like tens of hours) minimizing dependencies
in my app. It's horribly painful… :-(
On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think you have to pick some goals. What is the main purpose of a Spark
> Tree? Is it just to allow for Spark skinning of the control? Do
I think you have to pick some goals. What is the main purpose of a Spark
Tree? Is it just to allow for Spark skinning of the control? Does it have
to run on mobile (Spark DataGrid is not recommended for mobile either and
the Adobe version of Spark Tree was going to be based on Spark DataGrid
On second blush, it looks like spark-tree has all of the same dependencies…
What's the correct way to go about this?
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Okay. I'm looking into this now.
>
> I've tried Spark-Tree as well as this one.
>
> Both seem to hav
Okay. I'm looking into this now.
I've tried Spark-Tree as well as this one.
Both seem to have dependency on mx.
Spark-Tree has a dependency on mx.controls.treeClasses.ITreeDataDescriptor2
alatarus/tree has even more dependencies:
mx.collections.HierarchicalColl
I used Spark-Tree before, too. It's very stable, well implemented and allows
for a lot of customisation. I'd vote for that one.
David
On 22/02/2013, at 8:02 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I realized I need another missing Spark component: Tree.
>
> There's a few components out
My implementation:
https://github.com/alatarus/tree
Supports sorting and filter function.
2013/2/22 Paul Hastings
> On 2/22/2013 5:18 PM, Bogdan DINU wrote:
>
>> Hi, I've used Kachurovkiy's version - seems well written.
>>
>
> +1 (not that i'd know anything "well written" in flex but it works a
On 2/22/2013 5:18 PM, Bogdan DINU wrote:
Hi, I've used Kachurovkiy's version - seems well written.
+1 (not that i'd know anything "well written" in flex but it works as
advertized).
Hi, I've used Kachurovkiy's version - seems well written.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I realized I need another missing Spark component: Tree.
>
> There's a few components out there that fill this gap:
> https://github.com/kachurovskiy/Spar
I realized I need another missing Spark component: Tree.
There's a few components out there that fill this gap:
https://github.com/kachurovskiy/Spark-Tree
https://github.com/wasbridge/flex-4-tree
http://saturnboy.com/2011/09/spark-treelist/
Anyone have a preference here? Should we talk to o
13 matches
Mail list logo
