Stop hijacking other threads ;-)
Please create a dedicated thread to talk about this issue, otherwise
valuable information will get lost between the two current threads and the
JIRA ticket this is being discussed in.
EdB
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/7/14, 11:
On 10/7/14, 11:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> That said, I think I have successfully implemented workarounds such that
>> there is significantly less need to release the Installer, especially
>> since we don¹t have a fix for this SourceForge issue.
>
>While 4.13 is fixed 4.12 isn't (al
> That said, if you are limited on time and think that getting a new sdk
> release it the door is the only thing you have time for, I think we can go
> for the sdk release first
>
I’m not in a hurry to release the SDK. I’m just taking inventory, making
sure I understand all requirements and work i
Hi,
> That said, I think I have successfully implemented workarounds such that
> there is significantly less need to release the Installer, especially
> since we don¹t have a fix for this SourceForge issue.
While 4.13 is fixed 4.12 isn't (along with some earlier versions) and did you
did see tha
On 10/7/14, 11:09 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>> > Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the
>>Installer?
>>
>> We can, but if people can't install it via the installer we're not going
>> to see much adoption.
>>
>
>My understanding was that Alex¹s work with Œant_on_air¹ remov
Hi,
> My understanding was that Alex’s work with ‘ant_on_air’ removed the release
> dependency between the SDK and the Installer?
Not really as ant on air is also part of the installer, yes you can use command
line ant to install but that's not the most common way of installing it. While
I've n
Hi,
> Why do you say that people won’t be able to use the Installer?
Currently the installer fails to install the nightly build, 4.12.1, 4.11.0 and
4.9.1 SDKs. It may require some changes to work with the new release. It may be
that the various issues can be fixed by changes to the installer co
> > Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
>
> We can, but if people can't install it via the installer we're not going
> to see much adoption.
>
My understanding was that Alex’s work with ‘ant_on_air’ removed the release
dependency between the SDK and the Installe
On Oct 7, 2014 10:55 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
> a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA. So, my question is:
>
> Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
>
I think fixing
Hi,
> I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
> a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA.
None of those bugs have to be fixed before we release, but there are a couple
of minor regression issues in there and some other issues which would be good
to fix b
Hi,
I’m currently planning on doing an SDK-only release. However, Justin threw
a whole bunch of Installer bugs into the JIRA. So, my question is:
Can we release the SDK, without simultaneously releasing the Installer?
Thanks,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrech
11 matches
Mail list logo
