Hi,
> I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
> no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
> look at any changes to that folder between 4.9 and 4.10.
I checked it's correct, from MxmlConfiguration.java:
public static final int VERSI
Log as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33771
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
> no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
> look at any changes to
Justin,
I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
look at any changes to that folder between 4.9 and 4.10.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/22/13 11:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fixed and check
Hi,
Fixed and checked into develop branch.
Thanks,
Justin
Please file a bug.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/22/13 11:11 PM, "Chris Velevitch" wrote:
>Yes, it is a bug because:-
>
> public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x0410
>
>should be:-
>
> public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x040A
>
>And so should CURRENT_VERSION.
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 23
Hi,
> In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
> called compatibilityVersionString. In Flex 4.6 the value is 4.6.0, in Flex
> 4.10 the value is 4.16.0. I would have thought the value should be 4.10.0.
> This looks like a bug.
It's a bug but probably has no effect. Nothing internally currently
Yes, it is a bug because:-
public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x0410
should be:-
public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x040A
And so should CURRENT_VERSION.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chris Velevitch
wrote:
> In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
> call
