On a second look, it looks like GeneralFunctionsTest is causing the error.
It changes the resourceStringFunction, but does not set it back to the default
one. (although I’m not sure why not — it should be changed back in the finally
block).
On Jan 8, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Try chan
Try changing:
GlobalSettings.resourceStringFunction("invalidReplaceTextPositions”)
to:
GlobalSettings.defaultResourceStringFunction("invalidReplaceTextPositions”)
The resourceStringFunction can be overridden, and true overridden function
might not be returning the correct text. My “solution” is p
Hi,
I have removed "Ignore" tag from the test "spanElementReplaceTextInvalidPos"
-> ElementOperationTest.
There is something interesting happening there which might not be exactly
related to the TLF.
We have this part of code.
https://paste.apache.org/44I4
It's failing because it do not find t
Thanks Michael. Your help was crucial. :) I hope to push next part of TLF
tests soon to develop branch. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p41123.html
Sent from
>I have merged my code to develop branch. I saw that TLF build correctly so I
>can assume that everything is working fine. :)
Nice work. Congratulations and good job
Cool!
I just committed my table work to a “tables” branch. Any suggestions on how to
handle testing for that would be very welcome.
On Oct 6, 2014, at 8:53 AM, piotrz wrote:
> I have merged my code to develop branch. I saw that TLF build correctly so I
> can assume that everything is working f
I have merged my code to develop branch. I saw that TLF build correctly so I
can assume that everything is working fine. :)
In this location bin\apps\automation_apps\bin\ we should see xmls file with
reports for results of unit tests - If someone could take a look whether
they did create on the ma
Ok Thanks Erik. I will try to merge today my branch into develop. Will see
what will blow up ;)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40978.html
Sent from the Apache
> Next general question. Do you think guys that I should merge my code to TLF
> develope branch ?
> I'm not sure how this build script will be working on the machine where we
> are building our Flex SDK - while tests it is launching flash player
> projector.
>
This should be OK. If your setup work
Ok Thanks to Michael I'm done and TLF script building whole project and
launching all tests (13 classes) witch I rewritten to Flex Unit 4. Will be
working on the next.
Harbs I would like give a try to launch these tests on your code - you have
changed probably a lot in current TLF.
I know that yo
>I have missed something from your previous response and didn't try CIListener.
>- I am really sorry about it.
Now it is working, I can move forward.
No problems at all. I just wanted to know if you had tried so I could help you
debug it.
Hi Michael,
I have missed something from your previous response and didn't try
CIListener. - I am really sorry about it.
Now it is working, I can move forward.
Thank you Michael!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-develo
Hi,
Asking again, are you using the CIListener or the AIRCIListener? Those are the
components that do this work for you.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 2:45 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit tests in
Hi Guys,
I have created small project with FU and ant script. It's building this
project and launching FU tests unfortunately situation is exactly the same.
I'm waiting for the response ->
http://images.devs-on.net/Image/IbrK3QRfZHwy8PDh-Obszar.png
Flash Player is opening and launching tests. My
Are you saying that app should automatically respond to my script - ok I will
try to build small project with Unit Tests and Ant to see whether it will
work.
Maybe I have to in somehow reorganize current TLF unit test project.
Thanks Michael will back with the results.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex
Piotr-
> Should I dispatch some event through the -> flexunituirunner:TestRunnerBase ?
If you are using any of the flexunit CI pieces they take care of that
communication back to the launching process for you. I don't know if you are or
are not. Dispatching an event is not ideal as the TestRunn
Hi Harbs,
If someone help me beat this problem couple of tests will be ready for you
for sure. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p40883.html
Sent from the Apac
That’s great!
I’d love to run the tests on my work of TLF before I try to merge it back into
the main code base. If you have some time to help me with that, it would be
awesome.
Harbs
On May 8, 2014, at 9:58 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Hi Guys!
>
> I have committed my changes related to Flex Unit T
Hi Guys,
I would like to build tlf unit tests and running from ant build.xml file
these tests. I did it without a problem:
It's running a tests without a problem, but what should a I do to say to my
script "Hey I have finished my tests here you go my results!" ? Currently
script is wa
Hi Alex,
Sorry for the delay. I did try to put folder witch contains simple.xml file
and other files require for Test cases.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36
Excellent! Thanks for woking on it. What did you try putting into the FP
trust file?
On 5/7/14 11:58 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Guys!
>
>I have committed my changes related to Flex Unit TLF tests to
>FlexUnit4TestsTLF branch.
>TLF tests are consists with
>
>testApps - this is TLF editor ->
>http:
Hi Guys!
I have committed my changes related to Flex Unit TLF tests to
FlexUnit4TestsTLF branch.
TLF tests are consists with
testApps - this is TLF editor -> http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/tlf/demo/
automation_apps - it contains logic for launch tests, read some data from
xml files witch have
Hi,
> If you can launch the test automatically, that would be best, IMO.
But having test to run is certainly better than the current situation were we
can't run the tests. Check in it if it's an improvement over before (which
sounds like it is) and if it doesn't break anything else.
Thanks,
Ju
If you can launch the test automatically, that would be best, IMO.
-Alex
On 5/3/14 5:20 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>I have managed to build unit tests applications for TLF using ant.
>The result of this build is Flex application witch we could manually
>launch
>in the browser and start unit tests.
>
I have managed to build unit tests applications for TLF using ant.
The result of this build is Flex application witch we could manually launch
in the browser and start unit tests.
I think this is not what we are looking for yes ? How should it work?
Similar to mustella tests ?
1) built of TLF s
I know I didn't express my thoughts enough clear.
> Request.classes( classes.. );
Request.methods( class, methods...)
Wow Mike this is Awesome! :)
Thanks Mike and Alex!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-develop
>In flex unit 4 most of those information about test we have got into
>TestRunnerBase. When I add FU 4 to project I've simple removed all of those
>methods and UI for display information and I replaced it one line of code
>.
In FlexUnit4, the information doesn't do into TestRunnerBase really.
Thanks for working on it. If it is easier to hook most tests to cilistener that
is probably a good achievement. A custom runner for performance and memory
could probably wait.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
piotrz wrote:
After a lot of modifications I've managed to
After a lot of modifications I've managed to run first test's class with Flex
Unit 4.2 RC3 -> AccessibilityMethodsTest.
But I need some confirmation about my direction. In TLF "automation_apps"
project we have "TestDescriptorRunner" which implements this interface ->
http://bit.ly/1jQwerN -> Thank
Excellent. Thanks for working on it.
On 3/26/14 1:58 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>I did small progress with running TLF tests.
>Successfully build all apps which have been used for tests purposes - It
>wasn't so easy.
>
>Next steps are:
>1) Clean up code a bit.
>2) Try to run at least one test.
>3) Run
I did small progress with running TLF tests.
Successfully build all apps which have been used for tests purposes - It
wasn't so easy.
Next steps are:
1) Clean up code a bit.
2) Try to run at least one test.
3) Run ant script
Piotr :)
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
V
>FlexJS will keep metadata on the JS side, probably as simple properties on the
>classes and/or functions. I imagine we'll write a library that abstracts the
>fetching of metadata and returns it as an array of strings or maybe as JSON.
>If we could easily retrofit the metadata fetching in Flex
On 3/24/14 9:26 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>OK, I didn't see any non-Flex apps around the runners. The deal is the
>>mx and Spark apps can't wrap the runners and load in FlexJS classes at
>>the same time. I think I'll just have to replace the Spark app with a
>>FlexJS app.
>
>No proble
>OK, I didn't see any non-Flex apps around the runners. The deal is the mx and
>Spark apps can't wrap the runners and load in FlexJS classes at the same time.
> I think I'll just have to replace the Spark app with a FlexJS app.
No problem. We even got FlexUnit working in Flash pro at one point.
On 3/23/14 9:51 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>I found when trying to get FlexUnit to work with FlexJS that there is
>>some work needed there as well since the FlexUnit demos use mx or Spark
>>applications around the runners.
>
>Alex, this isn't completely true and I can help you with it. T
Thanks Michael if so I will study carefully everything and will try. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p36214.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development m
Piotr,
>For ex: http://bit.ly/1jjjhJ8
>They do not have any tags [Test] above the methods and so on.
These should still be able to be run through FlexUnit 4.x FlexUnit 4
understands how to run FlexUnit 4.x, FlexUnit 1.x and Fluint 1.x tests.
However, it may still be worthwhile to update them s
Thanks Alex I will try to do that.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Unit-tests-in-TLF-tp36199p36211.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Michael.
Thank you for your response.
I'm going to remove all of references to this library and replace it to
current version of FlexUnit.
Michael tests which I see in TLF doesn't looks like tests which could be run
through FlexUnit 4. I will probably have to modify all of them to run with
F
>I found when trying to get FlexUnit to work with FlexJS that there is some
>work needed there as well since the FlexUnit demos use mx or Spark
>applications around the runners.
Alex, this isn't completely true and I can help you with it. The runner itself
is entirely AS only, no Flex depende
>Question is what should we do with this ? Should we change it to FlexUnit ?
That is more commonly known as FlexUnit 1. FlexUnit 4 should already run those
tests internally.
>More over I think library was modified in some way for TLF tests purposes. for
>ex: Couple of properties from TestCase
If you've got the time, go for it! It would be better if TLF was tested
by other Apache Flex technology.
I found when trying to get FlexUnit to work with FlexJS that there is some
work needed there as well since the FlexUnit demos use mx or Spark
applications around the runners. I think we'll ha
42 matches
Mail list logo
