I was able to build without turning off RAT. Last night I think I fixed
the last issue in the RAT scan on the source package. You can't run RAT
on the repo yet.
-Alex
On 8/15/16, 10:28 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using maven without the
>problem.
>
I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using maven without the
problem.
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Just-got-my-first-FlexJS-talk-accepted-tp54302p54502.html
Sent from the Apach
OK, Does anybody else have any issues? I've unpacked the Ant-generated
packages for flex-falcon and flex-asjs and run Maven and the maven build
completes successfully on my Mac.
If no other issues, we could start a vote mid-week.
-Alex
On 8/14/16, 12:41 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Thanks for the lin
Thanks for the links.
Openfl had the simplest implementation. There’s only so many ways you can write
the solution to the same math problem… ;-)
For the most part, I used the logic in that code, but I did not use it exactly.
I just committed my changes. I improved the Matrix class to make the m
Hi,
> I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not
> actually using it).
If the original is GPL licensed then this may not be enough [1][2][3][4]
Justin
1. https://s.apache.org/rewriting-code
2.
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/81705/rewriting-gpl-co
Hi,
> I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not
> actually using it).
Why rewrite when you could just use an Apache license compatible version? i.e.
from a recent version of Shumway (rather than the older GPL/MPL version). [1]
It's currently TypeScript but would
I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not
actually using it).
I should be able to commit my changes on Monday.
On Aug 12, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> 8) Matrix.as and Vector3D.as
Uber question: are we voting on the packages generated by the Ant script,
or did Chris finish the packaging via Maven? My answers below are about
the Ant script.
On 8/12/16, 12:19 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source package?
>
>EaselJS and Tw
Hi,
> 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source package?
EaselJS and TweenJS are part of the CreateJS project so that’s probably a yes.
Either way there's no harm in mentioning it.
> 3) License for svg.js. This file comes from
> https://code.google.com/archive/p/closureidl/ where it
I've made some updates to the falconjx release packages. A reminder: only
the flex-asjs and falconjx packages are up for release. The falcon-only
packages are not.
Culling and consolidating from the links, I think the list of issues is:
1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source package
Hi,
> I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which
> is Apache 2 licensed.
Which we were already using right. If so nothing more would need to be added to
LICENSE or NOTICE (as it’s already there) so that’s one off the list.
Thanks,
Justin
I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which is
Apache 2 licensed.
On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> or encode/decode UTF8
On 8/2/16, 4:37 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test
>out
>the npm installer.
Nightly build?
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-falcon/lastSuccessfulBuil
d/artifact/
http://apach
What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test out
the npm installer.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a couple of licensing/policy issues outstanding AFAIK [1][2][3],
> also Im not sure if the issues with FlatUI [3] or e
14 matches
Mail list logo
