Re: Git Push Summary

2015-05-31 Thread Erik de Bruin
Hi, sorry about that. I accidentally pushed those changes to the develop branch instead of the vf2js branch. I've immediately reverted them. Never mind me, carry on. EdB On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:41 PM, wrote: > Repository: flex-falcon > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/vf2js [created] 2b06e

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Erik de Bruin
That’s perfectly OK, take all the time you need. EdB On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Harbs wrote: > Okay. I’ll probably have a few more commits to “tables” before I merge it > though. > > On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > > ‘develop’, but you’ll have to merge your curren

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Harbs
Okay. I’ll probably have a few more commits to “tables” before I merge it though. On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > ‘develop’, but you’ll have to merge your current ‘tables’ branch into that, > first, I guess. > > EdB > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Harbs wrote:

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Erik de Bruin
‘develop’, but you’ll have to merge your current ‘tables’ branch into that, first, I guess. EdB On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Harbs wrote: > In plain English, which branch should I push changes to TLF out to? > > On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > > I created and publis

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Harbs
Also, someone will need to merge changes to TLF done after I forked the code. (Sometime in May I think.) If someone has the time to compile a list of changes, I’ll cherry pick those and merge. On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Harbs wrote: > In plain English, which branch should I push changes to T

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Harbs
In plain English, which branch should I push changes to TLF out to? On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I created and published this branch to give us a clean baseline for TLF, > working towards the 4.14 release. > > This means that ‘develop’ can now be used for active developme

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-10-06 Thread Erik de Bruin
I created and published this branch to give us a clean baseline for TLF, working towards the 4.14 release. This means that ‘develop’ can now be used for active development (no need for the ‘tables’ branch). EdB On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM, wrote: > Repository: flex-tlf > Updated Branches

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-02-28 Thread Alex Harui
It's in. I'm pretty sure the caching problem will be in the installer code so I think I don't have anything else to go into RC3. -Alex On 2/28/14 10:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I was about to push an installer fix to prevent caching of >> sdk-installer-config.xml. >No problem I'll

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-02-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I was about to push an installer fix to prevent caching of > sdk-installer-config.xml. No problem I'll hold off making the next RC - just tell me when you're done. Thanks, Justin

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-02-28 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Justin, I was about to push an installer fix to prevent caching of sdk-installer-config.xml. -Alex On 2/28/14 10:37 PM, "jmcl...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: flex-sdk >Updated Tags: refs/tags/apache-flex-sdk-4.12.0RC3 [created] f363a0774

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-05-21 Thread Erik de Bruin
Please ignore this: I'm working on updating the 'release' docs on the Wiki and needed to make sure that what I wrote actually works ;-) EdB On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:22 AM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/releaseX.Y.Z [created] 4de87659c -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstr

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Nice to know what repo this was :-) > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/develop [created] 5e461b06f Justin

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-03-21 Thread Erik de Bruin
This automated email leaves something to be desired in the way of detail... here it is: Since the flex-falcon project didn't yet have a 'develop' branch, it was decided to create one and work from that. I took the local 'master' branch of flex-falcon (which was untouched) and created a local 'deve