Thank you.
I'll try this as soon as I can.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> I did not read this whole thread but I will tell you what I do.
>
> Assuming I am using the develop tree and have all my environment variables
> set up correctly.
>
> cd develop
> ant
> cd develop/i
I did not read this whole thread but I will tell you what I do.
Assuming I am using the develop tree and have all my environment variables
set up correctly.
cd develop
ant
cd develop/ide/flashbuilder
ant make-sdk
In FlashBuilder
Add the develop branch as an sdk
File -> Import -> Existing Project
Yes. I have that file, but the whole file is 2KB.
Opening it up shows there's not much there:
experimental.properties only has the header:
##
## Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
##
HI,
> Using either Flex 4.9 or putting experimental.swc in my libs, I do not get
> the components in either mxml hints or ActionScript hints.
FB is gets this info from the "fat" swcs, swcs with ASDoc XML info in them, do
you have the experimental_rb.swc file in frameworks/locale/en_US?
It may
;>>>>>> If you're talking about the ones in the experimental.swc, there are in
>>>>>> the 4.9 but you can use them with en_US only, I re-worked them in the
>>>>>> develop branch, so if you want to use them and even to have an SDK you
>>
p branch, so if you want to use them and even to have an SDK you
>>>> can
>>>>> use with IntelliJ, constantly updated, chekout the develop branch, do a
>>>>> first build, a release, use the makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder on the
>>>>> released
do a
>>>> first build, a release, use the makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder on the
>>>> released develop branch itself, not the resulting binaries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like that you can set this fresh SDK as the SDK you use if you want to
>>>> m
lexForFlashBuilder on the
>>> released develop branch itself, not the resulting binaries.
>>>>
>>>> Like that you can set this fresh SDK as the SDK you use if you want to
>>> make change in the SDK, you'll have only to run the ant target
>>&g
y on your sample projects.
> > >
> > > Ask me if I haven't been completly clear.
> > >
> > > -Fred
> > >
> > > -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM
> > > To:
your sample projects.
> >
> > Ask me if I haven't been completly clear.
> >
> > -Fred
> >
> > -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Sub
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Harbs
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:31 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder
>
> Yes. I'm talking about experimental.
>
> I linked to the 4.9 release and s:Alert and s:ColorPi
Weird, because I remember I mavenized the SDK 4.9 and been able to use them,
I can't see how you couldn't use them.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Harbs
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:31 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Bu
take care
of the dependecies,, may keeping an ant target for the locales... I should
give a try to that at time to see if I miss something.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Harbs
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:03 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working i
ou'll be able to test
> it right away on your sample projects.
>
> Ask me if I haven't been completly clear.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject
Okay. There's too much about the process that's kind of black magic to me. I
guess after I finish getting this working I'll understand how everything ties
together better. That's a good thing I guess… ;-)
I was under the impression that you could link to the source files instead of
the swcs. Wh
---
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder
Hi,
I did use the installer.
Which would of given you last release 4.9.
The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the
distribution fo
Hi,
> I did use the installer.
Which would of given you last release 4.9.
> The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the distribution
> for two reasons:
> 1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported.
> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in th
I did use the installer. The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather
than the distribution for two reasons:
1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported.
2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9 release.
I tried just copying those components, but
Hi,
There's good instructions under "Using the Binary Distribution" in the README
file. If you have any other questions just ask.
Justin
Hi,
> I'm having an awfully difficult time getting the source working in Flash
> Builder.
Either use the installer [1] or use the
ide/flashbuilder/makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder script to package up an SDK so
it can be used for Flash Builder.
> Also, why does it need 11.1 rather than 10.2 or
20 matches
Mail list logo
