RE: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2014-02-04 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>Hi Mike do you if anything has been done to solve the external dependencies >issue so it could be donated to FlexUnit? Nothing has been done.

Re: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2014-02-04 Thread João Fernandes
Hi Mike do you if anything has been done to solve the external dependencies issue so it could be donated to FlexUnit? On 9 October 2013 15:22, Michael A. Labriola wrote: > >If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an > ICLA is not required. > > It will eventually co

RE: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2013-10-09 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an ICLA >is not required. It will eventually come in via jira but there are other hurdles to pass first. It is using work from others, likely binaries and a ton of other issues that all need to be resolved before the patch

RE: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2013-10-08 Thread Alex Harui
If the patch is small, they should just submit the patch in a JIRA and an ICLA is not required. -Alex From: Michael A. Labriola [labri...@digitalprimates.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 6:41 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: FlexUnit - code

RE: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2013-10-08 Thread Michael A. Labriola
>I guess the first thing to sort out would be who actually wrote the code in >that pull request (it's unclear to me) and have they all signed an ICLA? They have not yet. That was actually the origin of my previous comment on wondering if I can take the github repo and site offline and start redi

Re: FlexUnit - code coverage pull request

2013-10-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I guess the first thing to sort out would be who actually wrote the code in that pull request (it's unclear to me) and have they all signed an ICLA? Anyone know? Thanks, Justin