Hi,
I would not like to see non-committers with root access to our infrastructure
(if we had any).
These people would have access to credentials for technical users that again
have privileged access to other ASF services.
If you asked me, I would opt for people having to be at least PMC to get
Hi Alex,
Well I think we shouldn’t go down the path of yet another login. I really like
the ASF LDAP system. This must be managed and taken care of.
Chris
Am 13.02.17, 17:25 schrieb "Alex Harui" :
Another technical thread
On 2/13/17, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
Hi Alex,
Maven has a hierarchy of settings. Above the pom.xml is the settings.xml in the
user’s profile and above that the settings.xml in maven.
Usually you don’t provide credentials in the pom, but define id’s. In the
settings.xml you usually provide the credentials for the ids to inject them
Hi,
> I forgot to mention that, besides the community tax, there might be
> another bill from the ASF for services we use such as email, release
> distribution storage, and assistance from the financial folks for handling
> the accounting of the money. The ASF receives bills for the same already,
Another technical thread
On 2/13/17, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>There is a HUGE difference between setting up a Jenkins on the Intranet
>and running a Jenkins on the Internet. From the end-user’s perspective,
>this isn’t noticeable, but when administrating these system, it is huge.
Forking a few technical threads...
On 2/13/17, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Right now, I don’t know how we could make sure we are able to commit to
>GIT or upload to maven without having the credentials on the VM we
>control …
I guess I don't understand enough about Maven and credenti
On 2/13/17, 12:28 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well a lot of what you write sounds sensible … especially with an assumed
>Community-Tax (or whatever you call it in the end).
>
>Eventually it would be an option to have a global “donation service” form
>the ASF together with the option to - let’
Well a lot of what you write sounds sensible … especially with an assumed
Community-Tax (or whatever you call it in the end).
Eventually it would be an option to have a global “donation service” form the
ASF together with the option to - let’s say add a “Donate to Flex” button on
the projects w
On 2/12/17, 4:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Don't worry about finances, that's an ASF corporate question - to start
>> with, look at the directed funding proposal from the past President's
>> report in a board report.
>
>Alex’s suggestion as I understand it doesn’t seem to fit with t
Hi,
> Don't worry about finances, that's an ASF corporate question - to start
> with, look at the directed funding proposal from the past President's
> report in a board report.
Alex’s suggestion as I understand it doesn’t seem to fit with the above
experiment. Alex (please correct me if I’m mi
A few clarifications on this excellent conversation from a long-time
Apache Member perspective:
Harbs wrote earlier:
> My thoughts:
>
> Conceptually, I like the idea of donating to projects (and in our
> case Flex). The direction of Apache seems to be moving to a more
> project-centric approach
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> The direction of Apache seems to be moving to a more project-centric
>> approach like we’re seeing with ApacheCon.
>
> Not sure that's case, for instance the other streams include Cloud, Big Data
> and IoT which involve multipl
Hi,
> The direction of Apache seems to be moving to a more project-centric approach
> like we’re seeing with ApacheCon.
Not sure that's case, for instance the other streams include Cloud, Big Data
and IoT which involve multiple projects. The IoT stream is likely to involve a
dozen or so projec
My thoughts:
Conceptually, I like the idea of donating to projects (and in our case Flex).
The direction of Apache seems to be moving to a more project-centric approach
like we’re seeing with ApacheCon. That makes sense to me in general as Apache
has grown quite a bit and diversified a lot in r
Ok … responding to this part first:
3) I don’t see the need of this. I think our CI servers are now setup nicely.
We have build-times of about 8-10 minutes. I don’t see a need to jump through
all the hoops of having to maintain our own infrastructure. Yes, the Ant build
doesn’t run on Infra, bu
On 2/10/17, 3:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> However, in January 2015, the board decided to entertain proposals for
>> directed donations.
>
>This proposal doesn’t see to match with what in that board report [1] as
>it's for $50,000 sized experiments. Are you sure you get board support
Hi,
> However, in January 2015, the board decided to entertain proposals for
> directed donations.
This proposal doesn’t see to match with what in that board report [1] as it's
for $50,000 sized experiments. Are you sure you get board support and VP
funding approval for this proposal?
> 3) I
17 matches
Mail list logo
