Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Alex Harui
Looks like I'm still using 11.1. Probably because that was the latest we had when we started the donations. Let's get to zero failures on 11.1 before trying 11.2. But I think someone tried 11.3 and there were more bitmap failures, so I would expect a jump to 11.7 to be messy. -Alex On 7/1/13 2

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'll let Alex answer that, as he claims to have a local Windows machine that once upon a time ran the main Mustella suite without failures... EdB On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > >> "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." > Ah perhaps

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." Ah perhaps I got that wrong but I think it 11.2 the version the tests were last tested with? And that might explain the number of failures? Thanks, Justin

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Erik de Bruin
Well, one of the reasons is your own "vote" from 2 weeks ago: "+1 for 11.1 and 11.7 from me but other people may think differently." ;-) We can easily switch if needed, so maybe this is worth a real DISCUSSION/VOTE so we can have a clear decision? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstr

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #198

2013-07-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > [java] C:\Program Files > (x86)\flashplayer11_1r102_55_win_sa_debug_32bit.exe Any reason we're using Flash Player 11.1 here? I thought 11.2 was the baseline? Justin