Hi,
> for simpletons like me, what else do i need for a manual binary installation
> on FB 4.6 besides copying the "\lib\external\optional" dir over from the
> 4.9.1 version?
This has come up several time on the list, basically if you copy things about
all bets are off. Please use the scripts
On 7/15/2013 2:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Can people please try out this and report any issue with existing projects
and the like. If no issues are found in the next few days I'll start an
official vote.
for simpletons like me, what else do i need for a manual binary installation on
FB 4.6 be
not yet, but I'll be doing it as soon as I get home this evening :)
-Nick
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So did anyone download and try the test release out?
>
> Justin
>
Hi,
So did anyone download and try the test release out?
Justin
Hi,
> drop air 2.6 support for linux? is that a possibliity for now?
It's the last version supported by Linux and the minimum one that the 4.9/4.10
SDK now supports so it sort of essential. :-)
Not 100% sure it is a current issue btw.
Thanks,
Justin
On 15/07/2013 10:37, Avi Kessner wrote:
drop air 2.6 support for linux? is that a possibliity for now?
You kinda have to support the tool used to build the installer, no ?
Tom
drop air 2.6 support for linux? is that a possibliity for now?
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> But I think the project would get a lot of positive vibes from the (vocal
>> :-) ) Linux crowd for shippin
Hi,
> But I think the project would get a lot of positive vibes from the (vocal :-)
> ) Linux crowd for shipping a Linux installer, even if it's marked as 'beta'
> or 'experimental'
Couldn't agree more - but we don't have many people who can/are working on it,
and that's despite most of the ha
I'm not going to be able to have another go at compiling it myself
directly on Linux till Tuesday...
From memory, it hits a bug in the 2.6 AIR SDK.
But I think the project would get a lot of positive vibes from the
(vocal :-) ) Linux crowd for shipping a Linux installer, even if it's
marked as
> One outstanding question. Do we just use the OSX releases for Linux or try
> and compile and sign a linux release for the Linux?
I think that if we include Linux as an supported (though experimental)
platform, we should compile and sign a release. What would we need to
make that happen?
EdB
10 matches
Mail list logo
