On 16.07.2013 17:27, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
- IntelliJ is giving me an invalid namespace error for this build
(binaries). I'm trying to track that down to see what is causing it.
I tried installer 2.6.0 rc1 and installed Flex SDK 4.10.0 RC1 with AIR
SDK 3.7 and playerglobal 11.7. I see
OK, I'll give you a break -- re-running with 11.7 and 3.7. OM's installer
enhancements are quite nice.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> Looks like AIR 3.8 is still not officially out as
> http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/3.8/AdobeAIRSDK.zip gives a
>
HI,
Looks like AIR 3.8 is still not officially out as
http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/3.8/AdobeAIRSDK.zip gives a 404.
Hopefully Adobe will correct this soon.
Thanks,
Justin
Not to confuse your thread, the original topic seemed to request feedback
across any/all platforms. Here is the log for an attempt to download AIR
3.8
Version 2.6.0 (windows)
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 3.8
Flash Player version 11.8
Creating Apache Flex home
Crea
Hi,
Done the new OSX version is now there.
Justin
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Laurent Jayr wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The installation failed on my side. Here are the install logs for your
> information.
> Thanks.
>
> Version 2.6.0 (mac)
> Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
> AIR version 3.7
> Flash Player version 11.7
> Creating A
Hi guys,
The installation failed on my side. Here are the install logs for your
information.
Thanks.
Version 2.6.0 (mac)
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
AIR version 3.7
Flash Player version 11.7
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK f
On 7/17/2013 3:31 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
The Installer 2.6 RC1 is up on the dist site (source + windows binaries)
the installer
- installed ok.
- installed the 4.10.0 SDK RC plenty fine.
compiled one of our bread & butter apps (big & complex) w/the 4.10.0 SDK, worked
fine. ran a fe
> I have one compiled if you're having any issues and can submit that.
>
> Only reason we might consider it it that I think the web of trust with my
> Apache digital signature is little larger (having gone to 2 ApacheCon/key
> signing parties).
Well, in addition to that excellent reason (and a "
Hi,
>> Erik is working on getting the Mac binaries as we speak.
I have one compiled if you're having any issues and can submit that.
Only reason we might consider it it that I think the web of trust with my
Apache digital signature is little larger (having gone to 2 ApacheCon/key
signing parti
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On 17/07/2013 09:31, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
>> Erik is working on getting the Mac binaries as we speak.
>>
> Is anyone trying to build the Linux version (remembering to target AIR
> 2.6) ?
>
I havent had a chance to try it yet. Wil
On 17/07/2013 09:31, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
Erik is working on getting the Mac binaries as we speak.
Is anyone trying to build the Linux version (remembering to target AIR
2.6) ?
I didn't get a chance to try this myself last night, hopefully will get
to try again later though. I should no
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am making a bit of a change to the Installer (adding ability to switch
> > Flex versions interactively). I will be ready to push it out in a few
> > hours. Lets make a new build together after that.
>
> Fine by me.
>
> Justin
>
Hi,
> I am making a bit of a change to the Installer (adding ability to switch
> Flex versions interactively). I will be ready to push it out in a few
> hours. Lets make a new build together after that.
Fine by me.
Justin
Justin,
I am making a bit of a change to the Installer (adding ability to switch
Flex versions interactively). I will be ready to push it out in a few
hours. Lets make a new build together after that.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've stuck a OSX
Hi,
I've stuck a OSX compiled installer to help test out the 4.10 release here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.6/rc1/binaries/
It uses the config file from here (which points at the Apache Flex 4.10.0 RC1
release)
http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-3.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Paul Hastings wrote:
> On 7/16/2013 9:33 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
>> I plan to put out an RC for the Installer soon.
>>
>
> i hate to say it but for someone like me having an installer to setup the
> SDK for testing would make it much easier. worked myself
Hi,
> I get that. I was wondering if having a regular build off the release
> branch would be a help during the RC period?
No need to we merge changes into develop which I think is simpler.
Justin
On 7/16/2013 9:33 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
I plan to put out an RC for the Installer soon.
i hate to say it but for someone like me having an installer to setup the SDK
for testing would make it much easier. worked myself into a tizzy trying to get
my dev environment squared away (JDK v
moment, you can do all of that with the Mavenizer/Deployer, the
> source directory of the SDKs (Air/Flex) is particular to this tool, look
> closely at the readme.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine----- From: Gary Young
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:45 PM
> To: dev@f
enizer/Deployer, the
source directory of the SDKs (Air/Flex) is particular to this tool, look
closely at the readme.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gary Young
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:45 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.10 release
Do you think it's po
I get that. I was wondering if having a regular build off the release
branch would be a help during the RC period?
EdB
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Once 4.10 is out, wouldn't that branch be merged into the master and pretty
> much be out of commission? I'd im
Once 4.10 is out, wouldn't that branch be merged into the master and pretty
much be out of commission? I'd imagine that develop is where we want our
nightlys to come from anyway.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Mind that the build machine is offline, so the latest 'nig
Mind that the build machine is offline, so the latest 'nightly' is of
about 4 days ago and is from the 'develop' branch.
Does it make sense that when (if?) the build machine comes back online
I create an RC job that builds from the 'release4.10.0' branch -
nightly and/or when a commit happens?
Ed
On Jul 16, 2013 6:48 AM, "Alexander Doroshko" <
alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com> wrote:
>
> On 16.07.2013 17:27, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
>>
>> - IntelliJ is giving me an invalid namespace error for this build
>> (binaries). I'm trying to track that down to see what is causing it.
>
> I can
On 16.07.2013 17:27, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
- IntelliJ is giving me an invalid namespace error for this build
(binaries). I'm trying to track that down to see what is causing it.
I can take a look. Where can I get Installer for Flex SDK 4.10 release
candidate?
Do you think it's possible to add a feature to the SDK Installer so that it
can also deploy FDK into Sonatype Nexus server? Thanks. -Gary
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Justin,
>
> On Win7, x64, JDK 1.7
>
> Things you already know :
> - RAT runs fine
> - checkin
Hi,
> - IDE scripts are missing (I see you just committed those to the repo)
Yep fixed.
> - IDE scripts in the repo are not pointing to the correct URL for the AIR SDK
Adobe is taking its time in getting out AIR 3.8, it's normally released the
same time as Flash Player, 11.8 was released a week
Justin,
On Win7, x64, JDK 1.7
Things you already know :
- RAT runs fine
- checkin tests run fine
- Mustella runs fine
My tests :
- My mobile apps compile and test fine.
- A few spot-checks of previously known bugs are now corrected
- Desktop apps compile fine.
Failures :
- IDE scripts ar
Hi,
> I tried the utilities, it can not find playerglobal.swc, I guess it has the
> license problems too
Post the issue you encountered in detail in another thread and I'm sure someone
from the list can help.
> Is it possible to get around it or to make it easier?
I believe so but as I said I d
I tried the utilities, it can not find playerglobal.swc, I guess it has the
license problems too,
I would have to say this is the worst hit for Flex popularity, Is it
possible to get around it or to make it easier?
Thanks.
-Gary
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
> Is Apache Flex deployed in any maven repository? is there a sample POM
> using it?
The short answer is no, it's not in a publicly assessable repository due to
3rd party license restrictions.
However you can use the mavenizer tool to use it inhouse. For more info about
that read at the b
Is Apache Flex deployed in any maven repository? is there a sample POM
using it? thanks. -Gary
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I've added some code to the VM's Jenkins script: there is now a loop
> running that alternates between a full suite (main, AIR and mobile)
> ru
I've added some code to the VM's Jenkins script: there is now a loop
running that alternates between a full suite (main, AIR and mobile)
run with FP 11.1 and AIR 3.7 and one that runs with FP 11.7 and AIR
3.7.
All combinations and sequences are now possible, let me know if you
want this set up dif
I'm working on getting the VM cycle through the various version
combinations. So, first run, it'll test 11.1 and 3.7, for all suites
and the next run it'll do 11.8 and 3.8, then back to 11.1 and 3.7 etc.
etc.
Everyone: please let me 'have' the VM today so I can set this up, thanks.
EdB
On Mon,
Hi,
> Alex tells me that the latter will require some fixing of failing bitmap
> comparisons, but
> we'll deal with that when it's all set up.
Can we have both baseline for 11.1 and 11.8 at the same time I'm sure sure it's
set up like that?
First step is to see how many tests fail I guess - if
Justin,
I'm here and have some time. If you don't have any pressing stuff that
you need help with, I'll be adding functionality to the Mustella VM
that will allow it to test all suites against both the baseline (11.1
and 3.7) and bleeding edge (11.8 and 3.8). Alex tells me that the
latter will req
Thanks for the link.
Btw, i'm concerned about accidentally importing the wrong component and
spending hours trying to work out why it isn't acting correctly (the
experimental Callout is not compatible with the existing one) rather
than the size increase.
On 15/07/2013 05:12, Justin Mclean w
Hi,
> Can you put up a link to the outstanding issues? (probably for 100th time,
> sorry)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33546
But it needs some updates re current state of play for linux support and tests
passing.
> Are the experimental components included in the sdk by default?
T
Some nice sdk changes - i can see a few of those being very handy (eg:
ButtonBar button disabling). Can you put up a link to the outstanding
issues? (probably for 100th time, sorry)
Are the experimental components included in the sdk by default? Either
via standard build.xml or the installer?
40 matches
Mail list logo
