"Second star to the right, and straight on till morning."
I think we're good to go. Thanks everyone for their patience and hard work!
EdB
On Thursday, August 1, 2013, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/13 6:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" >
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >>> Is there any advance on that?
> >> N
On 7/31/13 6:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> Is there any advance on that?
>> Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and
>>develop branches.
>
>I mean are there any other issues that anyone thinks to be addressed
>before I make RC4?
I'm all set.
Thanks,
-Alex
Hi,
>> Is there any advance on that?
> Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and develop
> branches.
I mean are there any other issues that anyone thinks to be addressed before I
make RC4?
Thanks,
Justin
On 7/31/13 4:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I would like the release to contain the IList revert, the resource
>>modules
>> fix, and the ProductInfo change to "Apache Flex".
>Is there any advance on that?
Not sure what you mean. But it is all checked into the release and
develop branc
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/13 4:09 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >As far as I can see there's still outstanding issues with Flash Builder
> >(and it's unlikely 4.6 can be fixed) so do we release the voted on RC3 or
> >not? This has now been held
Hi,
> I would like the release to contain the IList revert, the resource modules
> fix, and the ProductInfo change to "Apache Flex".
Is there any advance on that?
> The version can remain at 4.10.0.
Even though this will mean that "New Project" in both Flash builder 4.6 and
4.7 are broken? At s
On 7/31/13 4:09 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As far as I can see there's still outstanding issues with Flash Builder
>(and it's unlikely 4.6 can be fixed) so do we release the voted on RC3 or
>not? This has now been held up for a week.
I would like the release to contain the IList revert,
