Re: [compc] issue #4

2017-03-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/7/17, 12:56 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >Yeah. Is the fact that it’s in static vars something that could break it? That wouldn't surprise me too much. -Alex

Re: [compc] issue #4

2017-03-07 Thread Harbs
Yeah. Is the fact that it’s in static vars something that could break it? > On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 3/7/17, 12:16 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > >> I might have been mistaken. >> >> Right now, I’m seeing the goo.requires in the original js files, but they >> seem to

Re: [compc] issue #4

2017-03-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/7/17, 12:16 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I might have been mistaken. > >Right now, I’m seeing the goo.requires in the original js files, but they >seem to be missing from the js files in my test app. I’m not sure why >they are being stripped out — possibly it’s happening from >remove-circulars? Re

Re: [compc] issue #4

2017-03-07 Thread Harbs
I might have been mistaken. Right now, I’m seeing the goo.requires in the original js files, but they seem to be missing from the js files in my test app. I’m not sure why they are being stripped out — possibly it’s happening from remove-circulars? I’m also getting errors from google compiler l

Re: [compc] issue #4

2017-03-07 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/7/17, 10:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >There’s a lot of [ExcludeClass] tags in TLF. It seems like this prevents >the goog.requires to be created. > >I’m guessing that [ExcludeClass] was used to prevent the classes from >winding up in the ASDocs? Is there some way to do that which does not >break