Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Mark Kessler
Oh no the things I changed were very minor. a couple cosmetic and one default preference. No stoppers there. On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too. > > A release only required 3+1 votes and more +1 tha

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too. A release only required 3+1 votes and more +1 than -1. Currently for that to happen would require people to change their vote to -1 or more people vote -1 in the 72 hour period since voting ie in the next 24 hours I'm not s

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > One issue that I would like to see fixed: > Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two > VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not work. Any idea what the issue may be? Justin

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Mark Kessler
Well if a new release is cut lets get in my change in there too. -Mark On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > -1 Binding > > MD5 checksum matches > Good signature from "Justin Mclean " > Source package compiles fine > README looks fine > > One issue that I would like to

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
-1 Binding MD5 checksum matches Good signature from "Justin Mclean " Source package compiles fine README looks fine One issue that I would like to see fixed: Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not wo

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Mark Kessler
+1 -Successful compiled -Ran it and went through several sections (has lots of rough spots to be ironed out in the future). -Mark On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES > and the README. > > Chan

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
+1 No issues found when compiling. Release notes and other documents looks correct. On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > +1 > Compiles in 45 minutes on Linux under 4.12 > > Tom > > On 19/08/14 01:10, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a TourDeFlex Release Candida

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Tom Chiverton
+1 Compiles in 45 minutes on Linux under 4.12 Tom On 19/08/14 01:10, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and > the README. > > Changes from the last release candidate include: > - Add missing files to package so all examples comp

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-19 Thread Chris Martin
+1 On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The app opened in Safari and I was able to click and see some examples. > I > > noted the Spark Accordion example seemed to be a Spark app wrapped around > > mx:Accordion. > Yes some of the spark example use a mix of mx and s

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The app opened in Safari and I was able to click and see some examples. I > noted the Spark Accordion example seemed to be a Spark app wrapped around > mx:Accordion. Yes some of the spark example use a mix of mx and spark components, that's what the existing donated code did. I'm sure we c

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-18 Thread Alex Harui
+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/TourDeFlex/1.0/rc3/apache-flex- tour-de-flex-component-explorer-src-1.0.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.8.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is

Re: [VOTE] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding Tested on OSX with 4.13 SDK - md5 and signatures correct - LICENCE and NOTICE good - README and RELEASE_NOTES also good - all source has Apache headers - no unexpected binary files in source package - can compile from source - can view examples locally There one issue. If the swf