-1 (binding). See [DISCUSS] thread.
On 5/29/13 2:42 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
>the vote thread.
>
>This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache
>Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the
+1 (non binding), really like Swiz
On 29-05-2013, at 11:42, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
> the vote thread.
>
> This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache
> Flex, since there is multiple opinio
+1
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:21 AM
>
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Swiz Framework Donation to Apache Flex
>
> Hi,
&
+1 (binding)
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:21 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Swiz Framework Donation to Apache Flex
Hi,
-1 Binding, unless there are assurances that this will not be part of the
main branch, but instead li
Hi,
> -1 Binding, unless there are assurances that this will not be part of the
> main branch, but instead live in a separate repo.
It would be in a separate repo just like flexunit, utilities etc. It's entirely
optional.
Justin
+1 (binding)
-1 Binding, unless there are assurances that this will not be part of the
main branch, but instead live in a separate repo.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Reddin [mailto:gred...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:12 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Swiz Framework
+1 Non-binding. Let me know when it gets donated. I have some forked code
that allows you to also use Swiz in a Pure AS3 project, which may be
desirable for some.
Nick
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Carlos Rovira >wro
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
> the vote thread.
>
> This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache
> Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the Apache F
+1 Non Binding
I think Swiz is a great framework and see fit as a "utility library" of the
flex SDK which would be totally optional. Swiz is as good as Parsley, Mate,
RobotLegs or any other advanced lib out there but does aren't proposing to
be donated, it doesn't mean they couldn't be donated too
+1 Only if it's in a separate repo from the SDK and has different email
prefixes(like we have asjs/utilities n such).
Would be nice if it was clear that we are hosting it, but not solely endorsing.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com]
> -1 Agree with Ben Dalton
But you vote the other way?
EdB
> 2013/5/29 Jose Barragan
>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Jose Barragan
>> Chief Software Architect
>> Codeoscopic Madrid
>> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
>> Planta 5. 505.
>> 28020 Madrid.
>> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>>
>> On May 29, 2013, at 3:05 PM
Yes, I do not find polite integrating swiz as part of Apache FLEX, but I
agree that some of its capabilities could be studied to upgrade the SDK as
generic libraries.
2013/5/29 Erik de Bruin
> > -1 Agree with Ben Dalton
>
> But you vote the other way?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> > 2013/5/29 Jose Barragan
-1 Agree with Ben Dalton
2013/5/29 Jose Barragan
> +1
>
> --
> Jose Barragan
> Chief Software Architect
> Codeoscopic Madrid
> C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
> Planta 5. 505.
> 28020 Madrid.
> Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> >
> > 0 [Binding]
> >
>
+1
--
Jose Barragan
Chief Software Architect
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
Planta 5. 505.
28020 Madrid.
Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
On May 29, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> 0 [Binding]
>
> On 5/29/2013 5:43 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>> After proposal thread (http://ma
0 [Binding]
On 5/29/2013 5:43 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
the vote thread.
This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache
Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the Apache Flex community.
po
Hi,
Generally a -1 vote needs a reason can you explain why?
Thanks,
Justin
+1 non binding
While I don't wish for flex to integrate another meta framework for
application development, I WOULD like to see come of the components of Swiz
integrated as language features. Dependency injection is a powerful tool
that is a central part of most other frameworks in this space (web
-1 (binding)
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Margo Powell wrote:
> +1
> I love using swiz as a complement to flex sdk!
>
> > Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:43:28 +0200
> > Subject: [VOTE] Swiz Framework Donation to Apache
+1
I love using swiz as a complement to flex sdk!
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:43:28 +0200
> Subject: [VOTE] Swiz Framework Donation to Apache Flex
> From: carlosrov...@apache.org
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
> the vote th
+1 (binding)
EdB
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> After proposal thread (http://markmail.org/message/jtedmmx5djqen52l),comes
> the vote thread.
>
> This thread is to decide if we finally adopt Swiz Framework under Apache
> Flex, since there is multiple opinions in the A
21 matches
Mail list logo
