Try:
$ git branch --all
My output is:
* develop
master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/develop
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/patches
remotes/origin/release4.9
This shows that my current branch is "develop" and that I have a local master
branch, and all th
Try:
$ git branch --all
My output is:
* develop
master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/develop
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/patches
remotes/origin/release4.9
This shows that my current branch is "develop" and that I have a local master
branch, and all th
Thanks Erik.
Okay, it looks like we have a consensus and frankly, I dont want to prolong
this limbo anymore.
I will be giving the go-ahead for making the sdk and tlf git repos
read-write now.
Before we open the flood gates, perhaps committers should write to a test
file first?
*Also, all commit
he.org
> Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> wrote:
>
>> Just did some checks:
>>
>> - master and develop branch history -> ok
>> - build sdk / other locales -&g
That's a go for me.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Om
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 6:52 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
Just did some checks:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Just did some checks:
>
> - master and develop branch history -> ok
> - build sdk / other locales -> ok
> - mustella checkintests -> ok
>
> Is there some obvious checks to do that I would have missed ?
>
> -Fred
>
Cool, thanks for checkin
Just did some checks:
- master and develop branch history -> ok
- build sdk / other locales -> ok
- mustella checkintests -> ok
Is there some obvious checks to do that I would have missed ?
-Fred
, I'm
> testing git right now.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Jose Barragan
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 7:30 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
>
>
> I'm c
+ svn r/w, I was away (I also need a social life), I'm
testing git right now.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Jose Barragan
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
I'm cl
I'm cloning right now, too.
@Alex, the missing empty folders, seems normal, because Git don't track folders
just only files. In case we need it, it's necessary include a dummy file like
".dummy" or whatever other dummy name.
--
Jose Barragan
Software Architect Chief
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infa
I did a folder diff of the develop branch. Except for the line endings on
a few files everything else is identical.
We have 3 people who have tested SDK now. Anyone else around testing the
git repos?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Om wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Ale
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches.
> Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches.
>
>
Your git directory will show the trunk (i.e. master) by default. I checked
the git log and I do see develop
Hi,
> I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wait.
I give it at least 12 hours unless enough people take a detailed look at it.
I've had a quick glance and the SDK history seems fine but I've not checked out
the file and done a MD5 check on all of them.
> The weekend is upon is
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> > I will have this thread open for 4 hours.
> Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we
> leave it open for longer than 4 hours.
>
> Justin
>
>
I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wai
HI,
> I will have this thread open for 4 hours.
Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we
leave it open for longer than 4 hours.
Justin
Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches.
Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches.
Is that expected and how do we move the branches?
Otherwise, a unix diff matched for tlf. TLF has almost no history since it
was donated from Adobe w/o history (was i
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing
> empty
> folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be
> easy to fix.
>
> Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does.
>
> I thi
A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing empty
folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be
easy to fix.
Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does.
I think SDK is good to go. I will take a look at TLF now.
On 3/15/13
I got a successful build from the git SDK (after applying the Justin
style workaround for the TLF issue).
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN.
>
>
> On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>> The TLF repo
I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN.
On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
> The TLF repo is up as well here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
> the same repo as the earlier one)
>
> Same 4 hour window for testing and rep
My command line SVN is too new a format (it claims) for Apache SVN and
my GUI client thinks it needs to download a million and a half entries
before it can tell me anything. So, no way to answer your question on
my end.
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Om wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that
> is...
>
> EdB
>
>
How far does the history in SVN go back?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > I'm cloning right now (88% done), will t
I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that is...
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and
> look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On
I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and
look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this...
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Om wrote:
> The TLF repo is up as well here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
>
The TLF repo is up as well here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
the same repo as the earlier one)
Same 4 hour window for testing and reporting issues.
Those who are testing or plan to test, can you please let me know right
away?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Mar 1
25 matches
Mail list logo
