Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Okay, I just cherry picked those two commits into the 4.16 branch. Thanks, Om On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm, I dint realize there was a 4.16 branch. I checked it into develop. > > Should I cherry pick them into 4.16 branch? > > Yep that would be best. >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > Hmm, I dint realize there was a 4.16 branch. I checked it into develop. > Should I cherry pick them into 4.16 branch? Yep that would be best. Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hmm, I dint realize there was a 4.16 branch. I checked it into develop. Should I cherry pick them into 4.16 branch? On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't see my changes to installer.xml in this RC. Did you get the > latest > > code before building the RC? >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > I don't see my changes to installer.xml in this RC. Did you get the latest > code before building the RC? I made the release before you checked in the fix. However I don’t see any changes to the installer.xml in the 4.16 release branch? Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I don't see my changes to installer.xml in this RC. Did you get the latest code before building the RC? Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Just to make sure everything is working before we make an official release > candidate I’ve up up an RC0 here: > h

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, Just to make sure everything is working before we make an official release candidate I’ve up up an RC0 here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.0/rc0/ It would be great if people could take a look and report back any issues they find. Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I've pushed a fix, but unable to test it on the nightly. For some reason or the other, the nightly builds keep failing. My weekend has started, so I will be able to spend more time on this over the next couple of days. Thanks, Om On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > A bit more progress over the weekend. Hopefully will be done this week. Any progress? Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

A bit more progress over the weekend. Hopefully will be done this week. Although, you are free to release without the fixes if you feel like. Thanks, Om On Dec 5, 2016 12:46 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > > I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks like the individual > > file

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks like the individual > files are not downloadable from google code anymore. Any luck sorting this out? If not giving it’s delaying the release at this point I suggest we should release without it. Thinks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks like the individual files are not downloadable from google code anymore. I just downloaded the full zip file and copied over the required files. On Nov 27, 2016 9:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > So I just tried this out but ant_on_air

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, So I just tried this out but ant_on_air is failing to compile. Looks like SimpleUntar.as has moved? BUILD FAILED /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexUtilitiesGit/flex-installer/ant_on_air/build.xml:85: Can't get http://as3-simple-untar.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/de/ketzler/utils/Simp

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Iirc the move was in the unzip instead of the dmg unpack because of the condition logic. You could try an old ant version and see if you have the same problem. Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Fri, Nov 25, 2016 12:10 PM

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Nov 25, 2016 9:43 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Per [1], ant_on_air is using Ant 1.7.1 and older behavior. Probably the > easiest path is to alter installer.xml accordingly. I will l, if that is the problem. But the exceptions are on the Move tag. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > [1] http://ant.apa

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Per [1], ant_on_air is using Ant 1.7.1 and older behavior. Probably the easiest path is to alter installer.xml accordingly. -Alex [1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/properties.html#if+unless On 11/25/16, 12:32 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >On 11/24/16, 11:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of O

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On 11/24/16, 11:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >I managed to debug the Installer app. > >First, is this the error you are seeing? > >Error: Error #3003: File or directory does not exist. > >at flash.filesystem::File/moveTo() > >at >org.apache.flex.ant.tags::M

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I managed to debug the Installer app. First, is this the error you are seeing? Error: Error #3003: File or directory does not exist. at flash.filesystem::File/moveTo() at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Move/doMove()[/Users/omuppirala/apacheflex/flex-utilities/flex-installer/ant_on_air/src/org/apache

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On 11/21/16, 6:16 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >>>1. In sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml, for the new SDK entries, I don't >know >> >where to get the cacheID and cacheID2 properties. >> >> MD5Checker will compute the values. > >Where is the code for that? In flex

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Nov 21, 2016 12:15 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 11/20/16, 10:52 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" wrote: > > >Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. > > > >Here is the commit diff. For some reason, the changes are not being > >highlighted

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, I think the 2 issues you run into point out that it would be nice to some a little more documentation on how the installer config file works. I’m on holiday this week and flying back to Australia from Europe on next weekend so I’m unlikely to be able to get to it until then. Thanks, Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On 11/20/16, 10:52 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. > >Here is the commit diff. For some reason, the changes are not being >highlighted - the who file is being shown as modified. >https://github.com/a

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

And oh yes, the installer config has been pushed to staging. Please do not publish the site without pushing a new release of the sdk. Otherwise the Apache Flex Installer app will be broken for AIR 24.0 beta. Thanks, Om On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Okay, I upd

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. Here is the commit diff. For some reason, the changes are not being highlighted - the who file is being shown as modified. https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/commit/dec79b57835810f94d cf0d11e5d1cdd09e86d862?diff=split#diff-f51338f41f24

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > Update: I have figured out the changes required to the Ant script to make > this work. I just need to integrate the new script with the installer.xml > to make this work. Great thanks for that. Justin

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Update: I have figured out the changes required to the Ant script to make this work. I just need to integrate the new script with the installer.xml to make this work. I am hoping to get that working over the weekend. Thanks, Om On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We’re getting closer to making a release candidate for the next Flex SDK > release. > > Currently the two things holding up this release are there two JIRAs: > [1] FLEX-34880 Place Sort and SortField state setters behind mx_internal >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hi, > What do we want to do about the BrokerLocalConnection option for MXMLC? I don't think it’ needed for this release. It would be nice if we had move information on what the option is. I’d look at the differences and while the files differ by one byte it’s not a simple bit flip which is wha

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

What do we want to do about the BrokerLocalConnection option for MXMLC? -Alex On 11/8/16, 2:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >We’re getting closer to making a release candidate for the next Flex SDK >release. > >Currently the two things holding up this release are there two JIRAs: >[1] FLE

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I am reverting [1] in the next few hours, and we'll continue the discussion after the release to find a solution which doesn't break backwards compatibility. On 8 November 2016 at 23:59, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We’re getting closer to making a release candidate for the next Flex SDK > rel