On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I ran a FlexJS and a SDK local install with a newer installer that
> should have the tracker call after the ant_on_air install.
>
> Let me know if you see it in the analytics.
>
>
I see these two:
/track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK
OK, I ran a FlexJS and a SDK local install with a newer installer that
should have the tracker call after the ant_on_air install.
Let me know if you see it in the analytics.
-Alex
On 2/13/14 6:13 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Well, the builds server seems to be down. I'm trying a locally built
>Fl
Well, the builds server seems to be down. I'm trying a locally built
FlexJS install right now.
-Alex
On 2/13/14 5:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I see a couple of failure calls now:
>http://flex.apache.org/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache%20Fl
>ex%20SDK%204.11.0&version=4.1
I see a couple of failure calls now:
http://flex.apache.org/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache%20Flex%20SDK%204.11.0&version=4.11.0&os=windows
http://flex.apache.org/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache%20FlexJS%20Nightly&version=4.0.1&os=mac
A couple of success calls and we
OK, I see it
On 2/13/14 3:30 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I can cut an Installer RC this evening or maybe tomorrow (I'll have a
>> Windows and Mac then as well). I'll need the production key. Please
>>send
>> it to me off-list.
>>
>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I can cut an Installer RC this evening or maybe tomorrow (I'll have a
> Windows and Mac then as well). I'll need the production key. Please send
> it to me off-list.
>
Sent to your aha...@adobe.com email id.
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thanks
> -Alex
Oh, and I'll bet when the code goes into the ant_on_air install it never
comes back and calls the tracker code. I'll fix that too.
-Alex
On 2/13/14 3:20 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>To see dev builds, right-click and choose "Show dev builds". We need to
>hide them so we don't get in trouble for a
To see dev builds, right-click and choose "Show dev builds". We need to
hide them so we don't get in trouble for advertising unreleased builds to
the "public".
I'll look into ignoring the mirrors for the xml file.
-Alex
On 2/13/14 3:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I've done a FlexJS and
I've done a FlexJS and an SDK install. Hopefully they show up in the
> analytics
>
>
I dont see them. Not sure what's happening.
When I try to run the app (built from code), I dont see FlexJS as one of
the options. I can see that the Installer does indeed load the config file
from: http://flex
I can cut an Installer RC this evening or maybe tomorrow (I'll have a
Windows and Mac then as well). I'll need the production key. Please send
it to me off-list.
Thanks
-Alex
On 2/13/14 2:50 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 2/13/14 1:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Feb 13, 201
On 2/13/14 1:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>> Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC?
>>>
>>>
>> Would be good to have that in the first RC. What if tha
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC?
>>
>>
> Would be good to have that in the first RC. What if that becomes the
> golden one? ;-)
> Give me a few hours.
>
>
Don
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC?
>
>
Would be good to have that in the first RC. What if that becomes the
golden one? ;-)
Give me a few hours.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> On 2/13/14 12:26 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>
Oh yeah, should we do that before an installer RC?
-Alex
On 2/13/14 12:26 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Excellent. I'll find a way to switch between them and then start
>>prepping
>> an RC.
>>
>>
>Cool. I will give a shot at gettin
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Excellent. I'll find a way to switch between them and then start prepping
> an RC.
>
>
Cool. I will give a shot at getting the tracking to differentiate between
flex, flexjs and falcon in the meantime.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
> On 2/13/14 12
Excellent. I'll find a way to switch between them and then start prepping
an RC.
-Alex
On 2/13/14 12:14 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:20 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>> It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex"
>>when
>> FlexJS is s
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:20 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when
> FlexJS is selected. Hi,
>
>>
>>
I just added the two logos - flexjs and flex falcon. You can see them here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flex-u
Hi,
> Which is exactly why we need an Installer for FlexJS in place first before
> we release the SDK. Only then we can release the FlexJS SDK.
I thought it would be the other way around - but it does seem to be a
chicken/egg type problem.
> What use is 'releasing' an SDK source kit if no one c
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release.
> Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> to be official.
>
> > I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested.
> In t
On 2/10/14 4:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release.
>Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>to be official.
>
>> I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested.
>In that case we sh
Hi,
> If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release.
Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC to be
official.
> I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested.
In that case we shouldn't be making available it to the general public.
On 2/10/14 3:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builder that was pointed out several
>> weeks ago.
>But it's OK with the Adobe Flex 3.0 SDKs? Seems odd to me.
If we name it 3.x then FB has other assumption about what SWCs are
available. And we certainly
On 2/10/14 3:53 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>>The reasoning is that Flash Builder won't handle version numbers below 4.
>>
>
>Ah, I forgot about Flash Builder and its idiosy
>
> > I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following
> > the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you think
> > we're in violation, please be more specific about what we need to change.
>
> IMO without an actual release we could be in violation yes.
Hi,
> Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builder that was pointed out several
> weeks ago.
But it's OK with the Adobe Flex 3.0 SDKs? Seems odd to me.
> I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following
> the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you th
One reason we want to release FlexJS with a major version number is that we
can announce it via an ASF press release.
Remember that they do that only for major releases and not dot releases.
We dont want to miss all the press coverage.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, OmPrakash Mupp
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when
> >FlexJS is selected.
> In the skin, "Apache Flex" appears to be a bitmap. I don't know what font
> we used,
On 2/10/14 3:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and
>> 4.0.1.
>As it hasn't been officially released or voted on it - I would of
>expected a 0.1/0.8/0.9 or the like version number.
Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builde
On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when
>FlexJS is selected.
In the skin, "Apache Flex" appears to be a bitmap. I don't know what font
we used, etc. If you can generate new bitmaps for FlexJS and maybe
Falcon/
Hi,
> More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and
> 4.0.1.
As it hasn't been officially released or voted on it - I would of expected a
0.1/0.8/0.9 or the like version number.
We also need to be very careful re provide non official release to users. [1]
"Under no circ
It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when
FlexJS is selected.
More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and
4.0.1.
I dont know where 4.0.1 comes from? What is the reasoning? Perhaps we
need a poll for that?
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Feb 10, 2
31 matches
Mail list logo
