Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-06 Thread Peter Ent
I found the problem: the NumericStepper's sizeChange handler was not being called when the NS appears in this simpler test case. It is being called when it is displayed in the FlexJSStore, for example. The more complex app with nested containers and layouts is setting the right conditions so the si

Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-06 Thread Peter Ent
OK, thanks. I'm looking at this now (as soon as my sync of Alex's changes completes). ‹peter On 6/6/17, 3:17 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Peter, > >I just raised jira -> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.ap >ache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35322&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca

Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-06 Thread piotrz
Peter, I just raised jira -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35322 Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Layout-of-NumericStepper-is-broken-tp62108p62149.html Sent from the

Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-05 Thread Alex Harui
Run the FlexJSStore example and go to the Products tab. NumericStepper looks fine to me there. -Alex On 6/5/17, 7:49 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Hi Peter, > >It is Windows 10 and Chrome 59.0.3071.82 >I tried also on Firefox: 53.0.3 (32 bits) > >Piotr > > > >- >Apache Flex PMC >piotrzarzyck...@gma

Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-05 Thread piotrz
Hi Peter, It is Windows 10 and Chrome 59.0.3071.82 I tried also on Firefox: 53.0.3 (32 bits) Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Layout-of-NumericStepper-is-broken-tp62108p62110.html

Re: [FlexJS] Layout of NumericStepper is broken

2017-06-05 Thread Peter Ent
I'm looking into it. The SWF and JS versions are different. There's a border around it, which is specified in the defaults.css. I'm not sure why that is there; maybe I put it there awhile ago I just don't remember. It looks better without it. The SWF version, for me, has some extra graphics in the