In case anyone else is interested in making this work, a work around would be
to wrap the mdl components in elements. Then you can use VContainer
[1], HContainer, etc.
[1] https://paste.apache.org/y1bx
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex
Hi
2017-02-14 7:05 GMT+01:00 yishayw :
> Thanks for the explanation. I see your points, and it would probably be
> better if we had an MDL like theme for the basic set so we don't have to
> worry about layout and style conflicts. Pragmatically speaking, right now
> our best bet is to re-use your
Thanks for the explanation. I see your points, and it would probably be
better if we had an MDL like theme for the basic set so we don't have to
worry about layout and style conflicts. Pragmatically speaking, right now
our best bet is to re-use your implementation in our Basic based app. It
might a
I don't recommend to use FlexJS Components at all if you use MDL set. Some
points:
1.- MDL (like other *imported* sets) uses it's own components, its own
implementation and rules, so we are only wrapping in FlexJS to make it more
usable in our FlexJS world.
2.- MDL has it's own way to make layout
Hi Yishay,
I think you should use mdl:Application (cause of Dialogpolyfill), but in
general I'm not sure how it will be working when you mix FlexJS native
components with mdl one.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-develop