Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Mixing Basic and MDL

2017-02-20 Thread yishayw
In case anyone else is interested in making this work, a work around would be to wrap the mdl components in elements. Then you can use VContainer [1], HContainer, etc. [1] https://paste.apache.org/y1bx -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Mixing Basic and MDL

2017-02-14 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi 2017-02-14 7:05 GMT+01:00 yishayw : > Thanks for the explanation. I see your points, and it would probably be > better if we had an MDL like theme for the basic set so we don't have to > worry about layout and style conflicts. Pragmatically speaking, right now > our best bet is to re-use your

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Mixing Basic and MDL

2017-02-13 Thread yishayw
Thanks for the explanation. I see your points, and it would probably be better if we had an MDL like theme for the basic set so we don't have to worry about layout and style conflicts. Pragmatically speaking, right now our best bet is to re-use your implementation in our Basic based app. It might a

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Mixing Basic and MDL

2017-02-13 Thread Carlos Rovira
I don't recommend to use FlexJS Components at all if you use MDL set. Some points: 1.- MDL (like other *imported* sets) uses it's own components, its own implementation and rules, so we are only wrapping in FlexJS to make it more usable in our FlexJS world. 2.- MDL has it's own way to make layout

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Mixing Basic and MDL

2017-02-13 Thread piotrz
Hi Yishay, I think you should use mdl:Application (cause of Dialogpolyfill), but in general I'm not sure how it will be working when you mix FlexJS native components with mdl one. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-develop