Re: [FalconJX] yet another one

Thanks! It appears to work. Now the only problems I’m (currently) seeing are that requires are being specified before provides. > On Mar 8, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > I pushed changes that should fix this. > > On 3/7/17, 2:08 PM, "Harbs" > wrote: >

Re: [FalconJX] yet another one

I pushed changes that should fix this. On 3/7/17, 2:08 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >The other one is the problem: > >super.replaceChildren.apply(this, applyParams); > >Becomes: >.replaceChildren.apply(this, applyParams); > >The “super” just drops out… > >My workaround attempts were in the AS3, nit the JS

Re: [FalconJX] yet another one

The other one is the problem: super.replaceChildren.apply(this, applyParams); Becomes: .replaceChildren.apply(this, applyParams); The “super” just drops out… My workaround attempts were in the AS3, nit the JS output. > On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > The output JS looks ok

Re: [FalconJX] yet another one

The output JS looks ok to me. AS: super.replaceChildren(termIdx, termIdx+1); JS: org.apache.flex.textLayout.elements.ParagraphElement.superClass_.replaceChi ldren.apply(this, [ termIdx, termIdx + 1] ); I could be wrong, but I thought there is no "super" in ES5. Does it not work correctly? Ar

Re: [FalconJX] yet another one

I tried the following two workarounds and neither one worked: super["replaceChildren"].apply(this, applyParams); var func:Function = super.replaceChildren; func.apply(this, applyParams); > On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:13 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Most of the other ones are “nice to fix”, but have been not