;org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.alignment_for_resources_in_try"
>> value="120"/>
>>
>> I won't object more than that if folks prefer 80 but for sure that won't be
>> a pleasant experience to me.
>>
>> For the rest of the formatting, I'm ok.
>>
>&
On 6/29/15, 2:38 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>I think you misunderstood me, I don't care about line length. If you want
>it 120 then that is fine, 80 is an old habit from Flex/Flash days.
Let’s go with 120. 80 is too little and 200 is definitely too much. But
my point about not liking auto
> id="org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.alignment_for_resources_in_try"
> value="120"/>
>
> I won't object more than that if folks prefer 80 but for sure that won't be
> a pleasant experience to me.
>
> For the rest of the formatting, I'm
80 but for sure that won't be
a pleasant experience to me.
For the rest of the formatting, I'm ok.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Code formatting
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015
On 6/28/15, 3:18 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>If nobody objects after 3 days I am running it on the whole compiler.jx
>and
>tests projects to get all formatting back in sync. It's driving me crazy
>committing things that are 2 lines but my formatter is formatting a lot
>more.
No real object
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I wholeheartedly agree with the need for a uniform formatting, and I think
> it doesn't really matter which rules are used, as long as they are used.
>
> A matter of procedure though: what you are doing with the '3 days till
> arma
Mike,
I wholeheartedly agree with the need for a uniform formatting, and I think
it doesn't really matter which rules are used, as long as they are used.
A matter of procedure though: what you are doing with the '3 days till
armageddon' is actually called a "lazy vote". Normally we do prefix the
